Literature DB >> 23539562

Quality colonoscopy: a matter of time, technique or technology?

Robert H Lee1.   

Abstract

Quality colonoscopy is defined by the detection of adenomatous polyps at least 25% of the time in men and 15% of the time in women. Recent studies highlight the importance of key aspects of high quality colonoscopy. These include the amount of time spent examining the mucosa or withdrawal time, the quality of withdrawal technique and new technologies which seek to maximize the detection of colonic neoplasia. This review summarizes the latest evidence regarding the role of time, technique and technology in shaping the quality of colonoscopy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adenoma; Colorectal cancer; Colorectal cancer screening; Quality colonoscopy

Mesh：

Year:  2013        PMID： 23539562      PMCID： PMC3602468          DOI： 10.3748/wjg.v19.i10.1517

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Gastroenterol        ISSN： 1007-9327            Impact factor:   5.742


  40 in total

1.  Efficacy in standard clinical practice of colonoscopic polypectomy in reducing colorectal cancer incidence.

Authors:  F Citarda; G Tomaselli; R Capocaccia; S Barcherini; M Crespi
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 23.059

2.  Appearance of enhanced tissue features in narrow-band endoscopic imaging.

Authors:  Kazuhiro Gono; Takashi Obi; Masahiro Yamaguchi; Nagaaki Ohyama; Hirohisa Machida; Yasushi Sano; Shigeaki Yoshida; Yasuo Hamamoto; Takao Endo
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2004 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.170

3.  Measuring the quality of endoscopy.

Authors:  David J Bjorkman; John W Popp
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 10.864

4.  Quality indicators for colonoscopy.

Authors:  Douglas K Rex; John L Petrini; Todd H Baron; Amitabh Chak; Jonathan Cohen; Stephen E Deal; Brenda Hoffman; Brian C Jacobson; Klaus Mergener; Bret T Petersen; Michael A Safdi; Douglas O Faigel; Irving M Pike
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 10.864

5.  Impact of endoscopist withdrawal speed on polyp yield: implications for optimal colonoscopy withdrawal time.

Authors:  D T Simmons; G C Harewood; T H Baron; B T Petersen; K K Wang; F Boyd-Enders; B J Ott
Journal:  Aliment Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2006-09-15       Impact factor: 8.171

6.  Colonoscopic withdrawal technique is associated with adenoma miss rates.

Authors:  D K Rex
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 9.427

7.  Population-based surveillance by colonoscopy: effect on the incidence of colorectal cancer. Telemark Polyp Study I.

Authors:  E Thiis-Evensen; G S Hoff; J Sauar; F Langmark; B M Majak; M H Vatn
Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 2.423

8.  Narrow-band imaging: potential and limitations.

Authors:  K Kuznetsov; R Lambert; J-F Rey
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 10.093

9.  Colonoscopic miss rates of adenomas determined by back-to-back colonoscopies.

Authors:  D K Rex; C S Cutler; G T Lemmel; E Y Rahmani; D W Clark; D J Helper; G A Lehman; D G Mark
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 22.682

10.  Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy. The National Polyp Study Workgroup.

Authors:  S J Winawer; A G Zauber; M N Ho; M J O'Brien; L S Gottlieb; S S Sternberg; J D Waye; M Schapiro; J H Bond; J F Panish
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1993-12-30       Impact factor: 91.245
View more
  4 in total

1.  Patient age and duration of colonoscopy are predictors for adenoma detection in both proximal and distal colon.

Authors:  Peter Klare; Stefan Ascher; Alexander Hapfelmeier; Petra Wolf; Analena Beitz; Roland M Schmid; Stefan von Delius
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-01-14       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Endocuff assisted colonoscopy significantly increases sessile serrated adenoma detection in veterans.

Authors:  Michael D Baek; Christian S Jackson; John Lunn; Chris Nguyen; Nicole K Shah; Steve Serrao; David Juma; Richard M Strong
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2017-08

3.  Comparison of the efficacy and safety of sodium phosphate tablets and polyethylene glycol solution for bowel cleansing in healthy Korean adults.

Authors:  Seung-Hwa Lee; Duck-Joo Lee; Kwang-Min Kim; Sang-Wook Seo; Joon-Koo Kang; Eun-Hye Lee; Dong-Ryul Lee
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 2.759

4.  Appropriateness of colonoscopy requests according to EPAGE-II in the Spanish region of Catalonia.

Authors:  M Marzo-Castillejo; J Almeda; J J Mascort; O Cunillera; R Saladich; R Nieto; P Piñeiro; M Llagostera; Fx Cantero; M Segarra; D Puente
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2015-10-26       Impact factor: 2.497
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.