Literature DB >> 18801631

Examiner repeatability of patellar cartilage T2 values.

Matthew F Koff1, Sebastien Parratte, Kimberly K Amrami, Kenton R Kaufman.   

Abstract

AIM: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the intra- and interexaminer resegmentation precision of patellar cartilage T2 mapping measurements in healthy subjects.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: T2-weighted images of patellar cartilage for 10 subjects were acquired. Two individuals manually segmented patellar cartilage at each slice location twice, once on each of two separate days. Bulk average and zonal T2 values for the superficial, middle, and deep layers of cartilage were calculated. The root mean square (RMS) and coefficient of variation (COV) were calculated using the repeated measurements of each slice of each subject by each examiner.
RESULTS: The intraexaminer bulk T2 differences were 0.2+/-1.0 ms, with an RMS error of 0.7 ms and a COV of 1.9%. The differences of interexaminer bulk T2 values was 1.0+/-1.4 ms, with an RMS error of 1.2 ms and a COV of 3.3%. The superficial zone of cartilage had the highest zonal variability of T2 values. The average interexaminer T2 values for the superficial, middle and deep zones were 42.2+/-5.6, 38.1+/-5.3 and 31.9+/-4.6 ms, respectively.
CONCLUSION: The interexaminer variability of calculated T2 values highlights the difficulty of interpreting significant differences of T2 values which are similar in magnitude. The repeatability measurements of patellar cartilage T2 values were less than reported intersession T2 repeatability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18801631      PMCID: PMC2675164          DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2008.05.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 0730-725X            Impact factor:   2.546


  27 in total

1.  Detection of changes in cartilage water content using MRI T2-mapping in vivo.

Authors:  C Liess; S Lüsse; N Karger; M Heller; C-C Glüer
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 6.576

2.  Quantitative in situ correlation between microscopic MRI and polarized light microscopy studies of articular cartilage.

Authors:  Y Xia; J B Moody; N Burton-Wurster; G Lust
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 6.576

3.  T2 relaxation reveals spatial collagen architecture in articular cartilage: a comparative quantitative MRI and polarized light microscopic study.

Authors:  M T Nieminen; J Rieppo; J Töyräs; J M Hakumäki; J Silvennoinen; M M Hyttinen; H J Helminen; J S Jurvelin
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 4.  Cell-based cartilage repair: illusion or solution for osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Wiltrud Richter
Journal:  Curr Opin Rheumatol       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 5.006

5.  T2 quantitation of human articular cartilage in a clinical setting at 1.5 T: implementation and testing of four multiecho pulse sequence designs for validity.

Authors:  Thomas Mendlik; Sonja Christine Faber; Jürgen Weber; Jan Hohe; Elisabeth Rauch; Maximilian Reiser; Christian Glaser
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 6.016

6.  Bicycle exercise stress in PET for assessment of coronary flow reserve: repeatability and comparison with adenosine stress.

Authors:  Christophe A Wyss; Pascal Koepfli; Krzysztof Mikolajczyk; Cyrill Burger; Gustav K von Schulthess; Philipp A Kaufmann
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 10.057

7.  MR imaging of normal and matrix-depleted cartilage: correlation with biomechanical function and biochemical composition.

Authors:  Jennifer S Wayne; Kenneth A Kraft; Kelly J Shields; Chang Yin; John R Owen; David G Disler
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Joint space width of the tibiofemoral and of the patellofemoral joint in chronic knee pain with or without radiographic osteoarthritis: a 2-year follow-up.

Authors:  T L Boegård; O Rudling; I F Petersson; K Jonsson
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 6.576

9.  Effect of gender on in vivo cartilage magnetic resonance imaging T2 mapping.

Authors:  Timothy J Mosher; Christopher M Collins; Harvey E Smith; Lauren E Moser; Rebecca T Sivarajah; Bernard J Dardzinski; Michael B Smith
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.813

10.  Quantification of T(2) relaxation changes in articular cartilage with in situ mechanical loading of the knee.

Authors:  David Nag; Gary P Liney; Paul Gillespie; Kevin P Sherman
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.813

View more
  10 in total

1.  Cartilage T1ρ and T2 relaxation times: longitudinal reproducibility and variations using different coils, MR systems and sites.

Authors:  X Li; V Pedoia; D Kumar; J Rivoire; C Wyatt; D Lansdown; K Amano; N Okazaki; D Savic; M F Koff; J Felmlee; S L Williams; S Majumdar
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 6.576

2.  Survival of bicompartmental knee arthroplasty at 5 to 23 years.

Authors:  Sebastien Parratte; Vanessa Pauly; Jean-Manuel Aubaniac; Jean-Noel A Argenson
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-08-08       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Knee articular cartilage damage in osteoarthritis: analysis of MR image biomarker reproducibility in ACRIN-PA 4001 multicenter trial.

Authors:  Timothy J Mosher; Zheng Zhang; Ravinder Reddy; Sanaa Boudhar; Barton N Milestone; William B Morrison; C Kent Kwoh; Felix Eckstein; Walter R T Witschey; Arijitt Borthakur
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2011-01-06       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  The repeatability of T2 relaxation time measurement of human knee articular cartilage.

Authors:  Ilkka Hannila; Eveliina Lammentausta; Osmo Tervonen; Miika Tapio Nieminen
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2015-07-11       Impact factor: 2.310

5.  The Osteoarthritis Initiative (OAI) magnetic resonance imaging quality assurance update.

Authors:  E Schneider; M Nessaiver
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2012-10-23       Impact factor: 6.576

6.  Normal T2 map profile of the entire femoral cartilage using an angle/layer-dependent approach.

Authors:  Yasuhito Kaneko; Taiki Nozaki; Hon Yu; Andrew Chang; Kayleigh Kaneshiro; Ran Schwarzkopf; Takeshi Hara; Hiroshi Yoshioka
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 4.813

7.  Radiofrequency (RF) coil impacts the value and reproducibility of cartilage spin-spin (T2) relaxation time measurements.

Authors:  B J Dardzinski; E Schneider
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2013-01-31       Impact factor: 6.576

8.  Association between quantitative MRI and ICRS arthroscopic grading of articular cartilage.

Authors:  Victor Casula; Jukka Hirvasniemi; Petri Lehenkari; Risto Ojala; Marianne Haapea; Simo Saarakkala; Eveliina Lammentausta; Miika T Nieminen
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-09-11       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  Voxel-based reproducibility of T2 relaxation time in patellar cartilage at 1.5 T with a new validated 3D rigid registration algorithm.

Authors:  José G Raya; Annie Horng; Olaf Dietrich; Jürgen Weber; Julia Dinges; Elisabeth Mützel; Maximilian F Reiser; Christian Glaser
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2009-04-01       Impact factor: 2.310

10.  Impact of different coils on biochemical T2 and T2* relaxation time mapping of articular patella cartilage.

Authors:  Milena L Pachowsky; Siegfried Trattnig; Sebastian Apprich; Andreas Mauerer; Stephan Zbyn; Goetz H Welsch
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2013-08-23       Impact factor: 2.199

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.