X Li1, V Pedoia2, D Kumar3, J Rivoire2, C Wyatt2, D Lansdown2, K Amano2, N Okazaki2, D Savic2, M F Koff4, J Felmlee5, S L Williams5, S Majumdar2. 1. University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA. Electronic address: xiaojuan.li@ucsf.edu. 2. University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA. 3. University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA; Division of Physical Therapy, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA. 4. Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA. 5. Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the longitudinal reproducibility and variations of cartilage T1ρ and T2 measurements using different coils, MR systems and sites. METHODS: Single-Site study: Phantom data were collected monthly for up to 29 months on four GE 3T MR systems. Data from phantoms and human subjects were collected on two MR systems using the same model of coil; and were collected on one MR system using two models of coils. Multi-site study: Three participating sites used the same model of MR systems and coils, and identical imaging protocols. Phantom data were collected monthly. Human subjects were scanned and rescanned on the same day at each site. Two traveling human subjects were scanned at all three sites. RESULTS: Single-Site Study: The phantom longitudinal RMS-CVs ranged from 1.8% to 2.7% for T1ρ and 1.8-2.8% for T2. Significant differences were found in T1ρ and T2 values using different MR systems and coils. Multi-Site Study: The phantom longitudinal RMS-CVs ranged from 1.3% to 2.6% for T1ρ and 1.2-2.7% for T2. Across three sites (n = 16), the in vivo scan-rescan RMS-CV was 3.1% and 4.0% for T1ρ and T2, respectively. Phantom T1ρ and T2 values were significantly different between three sites but highly correlated (R > 0.99). No significant difference was found in T1ρ and T2 values of traveling controls, with cross-site RMS-CV as 4.9% and 4.4% for T1ρ and T2, respectively. CONCLUSION: With careful quality control and cross-calibration, quantitative MRI can be readily applied in multi-site studies and clinical trials for evaluating cartilage degeneration.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the longitudinal reproducibility and variations of cartilage T1ρ and T2 measurements using different coils, MR systems and sites. METHODS: Single-Site study: Phantom data were collected monthly for up to 29 months on four GE 3T MR systems. Data from phantoms and human subjects were collected on two MR systems using the same model of coil; and were collected on one MR system using two models of coils. Multi-site study: Three participating sites used the same model of MR systems and coils, and identical imaging protocols. Phantom data were collected monthly. Human subjects were scanned and rescanned on the same day at each site. Two traveling human subjects were scanned at all three sites. RESULTS: Single-Site Study: The phantom longitudinal RMS-CVs ranged from 1.8% to 2.7% for T1ρ and 1.8-2.8% for T2. Significant differences were found in T1ρ and T2 values using different MR systems and coils. Multi-Site Study: The phantom longitudinal RMS-CVs ranged from 1.3% to 2.6% for T1ρ and 1.2-2.7% for T2. Across three sites (n = 16), the in vivo scan-rescan RMS-CV was 3.1% and 4.0% for T1ρ and T2, respectively. Phantom T1ρ and T2 values were significantly different between three sites but highly correlated (R > 0.99). No significant difference was found in T1ρ and T2 values of traveling controls, with cross-site RMS-CV as 4.9% and 4.4% for T1ρ and T2, respectively. CONCLUSION: With careful quality control and cross-calibration, quantitative MRI can be readily applied in multi-site studies and clinical trials for evaluating cartilage degeneration.
Authors: Hans Liebl; Gabby Joseph; Michael C Nevitt; Nathan Singh; Ursula Heilmeier; Karupppasamy Subburaj; Pia M Jungmann; Charles E McCulloch; John A Lynch; Nancy E Lane; Thomas M Link Journal: Ann Rheum Dis Date: 2014-03-10 Impact factor: 19.103
Authors: X Li; C Benjamin Ma; T M Link; D-D Castillo; G Blumenkrantz; J Lozano; J Carballido-Gamio; M Ries; S Majumdar Journal: Osteoarthritis Cartilage Date: 2007-02-16 Impact factor: 6.576
Authors: R I Bolbos; Jin Zuo; Suchandrima Banerjee; Thomas M Link; C Benjamin Ma; Xiaojuan Li; Sharmila Majumdar Journal: Osteoarthritis Cartilage Date: 2008-04-02 Impact factor: 6.576
Authors: Julio Carballido-Gamio; Jan S Bauer; Robert Stahl; Keh-Yang Lee; Stefanie Krause; Thomas M Link; Sharmila Majumdar Journal: Med Image Anal Date: 2007-08-31 Impact factor: 8.545
Authors: E Schneider; M NessAiver; D White; D Purdy; L Martin; L Fanella; D Davis; M Vignone; G Wu; R Gullapalli Journal: Osteoarthritis Cartilage Date: 2008-04-18 Impact factor: 6.576
Authors: Louise Murphy; Todd A Schwartz; Charles G Helmick; Jordan B Renner; Gail Tudor; Gary Koch; Anca Dragomir; William D Kalsbeek; Gheorghe Luta; Joanne M Jordan Journal: Arthritis Rheum Date: 2008-09-15
Authors: Keiko Amano; Janet L Huebner; Thomas V Stabler; Matthew Tanaka; Charles E McCulloch; Iryna Lobach; Nancy E Lane; Virginia B Kraus; C Benjamin Ma; Xiaojuan Li Journal: Am J Sports Med Date: 2018-01-24 Impact factor: 6.202
Authors: Valentina Pedoia; Favian Su; Keiko Amano; Qi Li; Charles E McCulloch; Richard B Souza; Thomas M Link; Benjamin C Ma; Xiaojuan Li Journal: J Orthop Res Date: 2016-09-19 Impact factor: 3.494