Literature DB >> 23974465

Impact of different coils on biochemical T2 and T2* relaxation time mapping of articular patella cartilage.

Milena L Pachowsky1, Siegfried Trattnig, Sebastian Apprich, Andreas Mauerer, Stephan Zbyn, Goetz H Welsch.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of our study was to assess T2 and T2* relaxation time values of patella cartilage in healthy volunteers using three different coils at 3.0 Tesla MRI and their influence on the quantitative values.
METHODS: Fifteen volunteers were examined on the same 3-Tesla MR unit using three different coils: (i) a dedicated eight-channel knee phased-array coil; (ii) an eight-channel multi-purpose coil, and (iii) a one-channel 1H surface coil. T2 and T2* relaxation time measurements were prepared by a multi-echo spinecho respectively a gradient-echo sequence. A semi-automatic region-of-interest analysis was performed for patella cartilage. To allow stratification, a subregional analysis was carried out (deep-superficial cartilage layer). Statistical analysis-of-variance was performed.
RESULTS: The mean quantitative T2 values showed statistically significant differences in all comparison combinations. The differences between the mean quantitative T2* values were slightly less pronounced than the T2 evaluation and only the comparison between (i) and (ii) showed a significant difference. The results of T2 and T2* values showed, independent of the used coil, higher values in the superficial zone compared to the deep zone (p < 0.05). Looking at the signal alterations, all coils showed clearly higher values (and thus more signal alterations as a sign of noise) in the deep layer. The validation of the reliability showed a high intra-class correlation coefficient and hence a very high plausibility (ICC was between 0.870 and 0.905 for T2 mapping and between 0.879 and 0.888 for T2* mapping).
CONCLUSIONS: The present results demonstrate that biochemical T2 and T2* mapping is significantly dependent on the utilized coil.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23974465     DOI: 10.1007/s00256-013-1699-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Skeletal Radiol        ISSN: 0364-2348            Impact factor:   2.199


  18 in total

1.  T2 star relaxation times for assessment of articular cartilage at 3 T: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Tallal Charles Mamisch; Timothy Hughes; Timothy J Mosher; Christoph Mueller; Siegfried Trattnig; Chris Boesch; Goetz Hannes Welsch
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2011-04-19       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 2.  Clinical practice. Osteoarthritis of the knee.

Authors:  David T Felson
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2006-02-23       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Measurement of signal-to-noise ratios in MR images: influence of multichannel coils, parallel imaging, and reconstruction filters.

Authors:  Olaf Dietrich; José G Raya; Scott B Reeder; Maximilian F Reiser; Stefan O Schoenberg
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 4.813

4.  Examiner repeatability of patellar cartilage T2 values.

Authors:  Matthew F Koff; Sebastien Parratte; Kimberly K Amrami; Kenton R Kaufman
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2008-09-17       Impact factor: 2.546

5.  Comparison of a 28-channel receive array coil and quadrature volume coil for morphologic imaging and T2 mapping of knee cartilage at 7T.

Authors:  Gregory Chang; Graham C Wiggins; Ding Xia; Riccardo Lattanzi; Guillaume Madelin; Jose G Raya; Matthew Finnerty; Hiroyuki Fujita; Michael P Recht; Ravinder R Regatte
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2011-11-16       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 6.  Cartilage MRI T2 relaxation time mapping: overview and applications.

Authors:  Timothy J Mosher; Bernard J Dardzinski
Journal:  Semin Musculoskelet Radiol       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 1.777

Review 7.  Cartilage imaging techniques: current clinical applications and state of the art imaging.

Authors:  C B Chung; L R Frank; D Resnick
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 8.  Quantitative MRI of cartilage and bone: degenerative changes in osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Felix Eckstein; Deborah Burstein; Thomas M Link
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 4.044

Review 9.  Measures of molecular composition and structure in osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Deborah Burstein; Martha Gray; Tim Mosher; Bernard Dardzinski
Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 2.303

10.  Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of knee osteoarthritis progression over two years and correlation with clinical symptoms and radiologic changes.

Authors:  Jean-Pierre Raynauld; Johanne Martel-Pelletier; Marie-Josée Berthiaume; Françoys Labonté; Gilles Beaudoin; Jacques A de Guise; Daniel A Bloch; Denis Choquette; Boulos Haraoui; Roy D Altman; Marc C Hochberg; Joan M Meyer; Gary A Cline; Jean-Pierre Pelletier
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2004-02
View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  MR Parametric Mapping as a Biomarker of Early Joint Degeneration.

Authors:  Eric Y Chang; Yajun Ma; Jiang Du
Journal:  Sports Health       Date:  2016-08-03       Impact factor: 3.843

2.  High-Resolution Methods for Diagnosing Cartilage Damage In Vivo.

Authors:  Kira D Novakofski; Sarah L Pownder; Matthew F Koff; Rebecca M Williams; Hollis G Potter; Lisa A Fortier
Journal:  Cartilage       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 4.634

3.  3-T T2 mapping magnetic resonance imaging for biochemical assessment of normal and damaged glenoid cartilage: a prospective arthroscopy-controlled study.

Authors:  Felix Wuennemann; Laurent Kintzelé; Alexander Braun; Felix Zeifang; Michael W Maier; Iris Burkholder; Marc-André Weber; Hans-Ulrich Kauczor; Christoph Rehnitz
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 4.379

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.