Yasuhito Kaneko1, Taiki Nozaki1, Hon Yu1,2, Andrew Chang1, Kayleigh Kaneshiro1, Ran Schwarzkopf3, Takeshi Hara4, Hiroshi Yoshioka1. 1. Department of Radiological Sciences, University of California, Irvine, Orange, California, USA. 2. John Tu and Thomas Yuen Center for Functional Onco-Imaging, University of California, Irvine, Orange, California, USA. 3. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, Irvine, Orange, California, USA. 4. Department of Intelligent Image Information, Division of Regeneration and Advanced Medical Sciences, Gifu University Graduate School of Medicine, Gifu, Japan.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To create standard T2 map profiles from the entire femoral cartilage of healthy volunteers in order to assess regional variations using an angular and layer-dependent approach. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty healthy knees were evaluated using 3T sagittal images of a T2 mapping sequence. Manual segmentation of the entire femoral cartilage was performed slice-by-slice by two raters using MatLab. Inter- and intrarater reliabilities were calculated using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland-Altman analysis. T2 values were analyzed with respect to specific locations (medial condyle, trochlea, and lateral condyle), angles to B0 , and layers of cartilage (whole, deep, and superficial). RESULTS: Inter- and intrarater reliability obtained from the entire femoral cartilage was excellent (ICC = 0.84, 0.86, respectively). The ICCs around the trochlea were lower than those of the medial and lateral condyle. Both the inter- and intrarater Bland-Altman plots indicated larger differences in pixel count are seen as the size of the angular segment becomes larger. T2 values were significantly higher in the superficial layer compared to the deep layer at each femoral compartment (P < 0.001). A magic angle effect was clearly observed, especially within the whole and deep layer over the medial and lateral femoral condyles, except for the superficial layer at the medial condyle. CONCLUSION: The normal T2 map profiles of the entire femoral cartilage showed variations in ICCs by location and in T2 values by angles and layers. These profiles can be useful for diagnosis of early cartilage degeneration in a specific angle and layer of each condyle and trochlea.
PURPOSE: To create standard T2 map profiles from the entire femoral cartilage of healthy volunteers in order to assess regional variations using an angular and layer-dependent approach. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty healthy knees were evaluated using 3T sagittal images of a T2 mapping sequence. Manual segmentation of the entire femoral cartilage was performed slice-by-slice by two raters using MatLab. Inter- and intrarater reliabilities were calculated using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland-Altman analysis. T2 values were analyzed with respect to specific locations (medial condyle, trochlea, and lateral condyle), angles to B0 , and layers of cartilage (whole, deep, and superficial). RESULTS: Inter- and intrarater reliability obtained from the entire femoral cartilage was excellent (ICC = 0.84, 0.86, respectively). The ICCs around the trochlea were lower than those of the medial and lateral condyle. Both the inter- and intrarater Bland-Altman plots indicated larger differences in pixel count are seen as the size of the angular segment becomes larger. T2 values were significantly higher in the superficial layer compared to the deep layer at each femoral compartment (P < 0.001). A magic angle effect was clearly observed, especially within the whole and deep layer over the medial and lateral femoral condyles, except for the superficial layer at the medial condyle. CONCLUSION: The normal T2 map profiles of the entire femoral cartilage showed variations in ICCs by location and in T2 values by angles and layers. These profiles can be useful for diagnosis of early cartilage degeneration in a specific angle and layer of each condyle and trochlea.
Authors: Xiaojuan Li; Jonathan Cheng; Katrina Lin; Ehsan Saadat; Radu I Bolbos; Björn Jobke; Michael D Ries; Andrew Horvai; Thomas M Link; Sharmila Majumdar Journal: Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2010-12-03 Impact factor: 2.546
Authors: Z A Zarins; R I Bolbos; J B Pialat; T M Link; X Li; R B Souza; S Majumdar Journal: Osteoarthritis Cartilage Date: 2010-08-07 Impact factor: 6.576
Authors: Tallal C Mamisch; Siegfried Trattnig; Sebastian Quirbach; Stefan Marlovits; Lawrence M White; Goetz H Welsch Journal: Radiology Date: 2010-02-01 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Xiaojuan Li; Alex Pai; Gabrielle Blumenkrantz; Julio Carballido-Gamio; Thomas Link; Benjamin Ma; Michael Ries; Sharmila Majumdar Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2009-06 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Yuxi Pang; Riann M Palmieri-Smith; Dariya I Malyarenko; Scott D Swanson; Thomas L Chenevert Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2019-02-22 Impact factor: 4.668