Literature DB >> 21212364

Knee articular cartilage damage in osteoarthritis: analysis of MR image biomarker reproducibility in ACRIN-PA 4001 multicenter trial.

Timothy J Mosher1, Zheng Zhang, Ravinder Reddy, Sanaa Boudhar, Barton N Milestone, William B Morrison, C Kent Kwoh, Felix Eckstein, Walter R T Witschey, Arijitt Borthakur.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To prospectively determine the reproducibility of quantitative magnetic resonance (MR) imaging biomarkers of the morphology and composition (spin lattice relaxation time in rotating frame [T1-ρ], T2) of knee cartilage in a multicenter multivendor trial involving patients with osteoarthritis (OA) and asymptomatic control subjects.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was HIPAA compliant and approved by the institutional review committees of the participating sites, with written informed consent obtained from all participants. Fifty subjects from five sites who were deemed to have normal knee joints (n = 18), mild OA (n = 16), or moderate OA (n = 16) on the basis of Kellgren-Lawrence scores were enrolled. Each participant underwent four sequential 3-T knee MR imaging examinations with use of the same imager and with 2-63 days (median, 18 days) separating the first and last examinations. Water-excited three-dimensional T1-weighted gradient-echo imaging, T1-ρ imaging, and T2 mapping of cartilage in the axial and coronal planes were performed. Biomarker reproducibility was determined by using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and root-mean-square coefficients of variation (RMS CVs, expressed as percentages).
RESULTS: Morphometric biomarkers had high reproducibility, with ICCs of 0.989 or greater and RMS CVs lower than 4%. The largest differences between the healthy subjects and the patients with radiographically detected knee OA were those in T1-ρ values, but precision errors were relatively large. Reproducibility of T1-ρ values was higher in the thicker patellar cartilage (ICC range, 0.86-0.93; RMS CV range, 14%-18%) than in the femorotibial joints (ICC range, 0.20-0.84; RMS CV range, 7%-19%). Good to high reproducibility of T2 was observed, with ICCs ranging from 0.61 to 0.98 and RMS CVs ranging from 4% to 14%.
CONCLUSION: MR imaging measurements of cartilage morphology, T2, and patellar T1-ρ demonstrated moderate to excellent reproducibility in a clinical trial network. © RSNA, 2011.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21212364      PMCID: PMC4104774          DOI: 10.1148/radiol.10101174

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  35 in total

1.  Global and regional reproducibility of T2 relaxation time measurements in human patellar cartilage.

Authors:  C Glaser; T Mendlik; J Dinges; J Weber; R Stahl; C Trumm; M Reiser
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  Rapid 3D-T1rho mapping of the knee joint at 3.0T with parallel imaging.

Authors:  S Kubilay Pakin; Jian Xu; Mark E Schweitzer; Ravinder R Regatte
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 4.668

3.  Accuracy and precision of quantitative assessment of cartilage morphology by magnetic resonance imaging at 3.0T.

Authors:  Felix Eckstein; H Cecil Charles; Robert J Buck; Virginia B Kraus; Ann E Remmers; Martin Hudelmaier; Wolfgang Wirth; Jeffrey L Evelhoch
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2005-10

4.  Proposal for a nomenclature for magnetic resonance imaging based measures of articular cartilage in osteoarthritis.

Authors:  F Eckstein; G Ateshian; R Burgkart; D Burstein; F Cicuttini; B Dardzinski; M Gray; T M Link; S Majumdar; T Mosher; C Peterfy; S Totterman; J Waterton; C S Winalski; D Felson
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2006-05-26       Impact factor: 6.576

5.  T1rho-relaxation in articular cartilage: effects of enzymatic degradation.

Authors:  U Duvvuri; R Reddy; S D Patel; J H Kaufman; J B Kneeland; J S Leigh
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 4.668

6.  Spatial variation of T2 in human articular cartilage.

Authors:  B J Dardzinski; T J Mosher; S Li; M A Van Slyke; M B Smith
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Double echo steady state magnetic resonance imaging of knee articular cartilage at 3 Tesla: a pilot study for the Osteoarthritis Initiative.

Authors:  F Eckstein; M Hudelmaier; W Wirth; B Kiefer; R Jackson; J Yu; C B Eaton; E Schneider
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2005-08-26       Impact factor: 19.103

Review 8.  Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of articular cartilage in knee osteoarthritis (OA): morphological assessment.

Authors:  F Eckstein; F Cicuttini; J-P Raynauld; J C Waterton; C Peterfy
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2006-05-19       Impact factor: 6.576

Review 9.  Cartilage MRI T2 relaxation time mapping: overview and applications.

Authors:  Timothy J Mosher; Bernard J Dardzinski
Journal:  Semin Musculoskelet Radiol       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 1.777

10.  T1rho relaxation mapping in human osteoarthritis (OA) cartilage: comparison of T1rho with T2.

Authors:  Ravinder R Regatte; Sarma V S Akella; J H Lonner; J B Kneeland; Ravinder Reddy
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 4.813

View more
  67 in total

1.  Comparison between different implementations of the 3D FLASH sequence for knee cartilage quantification.

Authors:  Martin Hudelmaier; Christian Glaser; Christian Pfau; Felix Eckstein
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2011-12-14       Impact factor: 2.310

2.  Advanced MRI of articular cartilage.

Authors:  Hillary J Braun; Garry E Gold
Journal:  Imaging Med       Date:  2011-10

3.  Bicomponent ultrashort echo time T2* analysis for assessment of patients with patellar tendinopathy.

Authors:  Richard Kijowski; John J Wilson; Fang Liu
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2017-03-06       Impact factor: 4.813

4.  Biexponential T relaxation mapping of human knee cartilage in vivo at 3 T.

Authors:  Azadeh Sharafi; Ding Xia; Gregory Chang; Ravinder R Regatte
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2017-06-20       Impact factor: 4.044

Review 5.  Quantitative MRI in the evaluation of articular cartilage health: reproducibility and variability with a focus on T2 mapping.

Authors:  Rachel K Surowiec; Erin P Lucas; Charles P Ho
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-10-30       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Sex- and age-dependence of region- and layer-specific knee cartilage composition (spin-spin-relaxation time) in healthy reference subjects.

Authors:  Wolfgang Wirth; Susanne Maschek; Felix Eckstein
Journal:  Ann Anat       Date:  2016-11-09       Impact factor: 2.698

7.  Kinetic [18F]-Fluoride of the Knee in Normal Volunteers.

Authors:  Bryan Haddock; Audrey P Fan; Niklas R Jørgensen; Charlotte Suetta; Garry Evan Gold; Feliks Kogan
Journal:  Clin Nucl Med       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 7.794

8.  The Osteoarthritis Initiative (OAI) magnetic resonance imaging quality assurance update.

Authors:  E Schneider; M Nessaiver
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2012-10-23       Impact factor: 6.576

9.  Biexponential T2 relaxation estimation of human knee cartilage in vivo at 3T.

Authors:  Azadeh Sharafi; Gregory Chang; Ravinder R Regatte
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 10.  T₁ρ MRI of human musculoskeletal system.

Authors:  Ligong Wang; Ravinder R Regatte
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2014-06-17       Impact factor: 4.813

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.