Literature DB >> 15087723

T2 quantitation of human articular cartilage in a clinical setting at 1.5 T: implementation and testing of four multiecho pulse sequence designs for validity.

Thomas Mendlik1, Sonja Christine Faber, Jürgen Weber, Jan Hohe, Elisabeth Rauch, Maximilian Reiser, Christian Glaser.   

Abstract

RATIONALE AND
OBJECTIVES: Evaluation of the T2 relaxation time of articular cartilage holds great potential for quantitative assessment of internal changes of the cartilage matrix. The purpose of the present study was to assess the validity of multiecho-based cartilage T2 quantitation in a clinical MRI setting at 1.5 T.
METHODS: Four multisection multiecho sequence variants dedicated for quantitative T2 mapping of human articular cartilage were implemented on a 1.5 T whole-body imager and tested for accuracy in CuSO4-agarose gel phantoms and human patellar cartilage. Sequence design was varied to minimize errors in T2 quantitation due to stimulated echoes.
RESULTS: As compared with single spin-echo experiments, the apparent T2 values calculated from the multiecho sequence variants showed mean deviations ranging from +26% to -32% (phantoms) and from +42% to -18% (cartilage). The patellar cartilage T2 covered a range from about 25 milliseconds to 55 milliseconds, with longer T2 values observed in the more superficial layers. In cartilage, best results were obtained from the sequence design using improved section profiles and a spoiler gradient scheme for suppression of stimulated echoes.
CONCLUSIONS: Our results revealed a clear dependence of apparent T2 relaxation times on the pulse sequence design, emphasizing that the "true" T2 is hard to find. In addition, the effect on the apparent T2 values resulting from the specific modification of any sequence variant varied according to the respective tissue's properties. Therefore, the acquisition technique in conjunction with the specific tissue on which T2 mapping is performed need to be reported in detail and should kept consistent to allow large-scale comparisons and monitoring of treatment strategies, e.g., in osteoarthritis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15087723     DOI: 10.1097/01.rli.0000119196.50924.f3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Radiol        ISSN: 0020-9996            Impact factor:   6.016


  11 in total

1.  Repair tissue quality after arthroscopic autologous collagen-induced chondrogenesis (ACIC) assessed via T2* mapping.

Authors:  David Stelzeneder; Ananthram A Shetty; Seok-Jung Kim; Siegfried Trattnig; Stephan E Domayer; Vishvas Shetty; Praveen Bilagi
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2013-08-29       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  T2* measurement of the knee articular cartilage in osteoarthritis at 3T.

Authors:  Rexford D Newbould; Sam R Miller; Laurence D Toms; Peter Swann; Jeroen A W Tielbeek; Garry E Gold; Robin K Strachan; Peter C Taylor; Paul M Matthews; Andrew P Brown
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2012-02-07       Impact factor: 4.813

3.  A comparative study at 3 T of sequence dependence of T2 quantitation in the knee.

Authors:  Alex Pai; Xiaojuan Li; Sharmila Majumdar
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2008-05-23       Impact factor: 2.546

4.  Examiner repeatability of patellar cartilage T2 values.

Authors:  Matthew F Koff; Sebastien Parratte; Kimberly K Amrami; Kenton R Kaufman
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2008-09-17       Impact factor: 2.546

5.  Alignment does not influence cartilage T2 in asymptomatic knee joints.

Authors:  M Sauerschnig; J S Bauer; L Kohn; S Hinterwimmer; S Landwehr; K Woertler; P M Jungmann; W Koestler; P Niemeyer; A B Imhoff; G M Salzmann
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-11-29       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Fast T2 mapping of the patellar articular cartilage with gradient and spin-echo magnetic resonance imaging at 1.5 T: validation and initial clinical experience in patients with osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Emilio Quaia; Renato Toffanin; Giuseppe Guglielmi; Maja Ukmar; Alexia Rossi; Bruno Martinelli; Maria Assunta Cova
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  T2 Relaxation time quantitation differs between pulse sequences in articular cartilage.

Authors:  Stephen J Matzat; Emily J McWalter; Feliks Kogan; Weitian Chen; Garry E Gold
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2014-09-22       Impact factor: 4.813

8.  Differentiating normal hyaline cartilage from post-surgical repair tissue using fast gradient echo imaging in delayed gadolinium-enhanced MRI (dGEMRIC) at 3 Tesla.

Authors:  Siegfried Trattnig; Tallal C Mamisch; Katja Pinker; Stephan Domayer; Pavol Szomolanyi; Stefan Marlovits; Florian Kutscha-Lissberg; Goetz H Welsch
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-02-02       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Voxel-based reproducibility of T2 relaxation time in patellar cartilage at 1.5 T with a new validated 3D rigid registration algorithm.

Authors:  José G Raya; Annie Horng; Olaf Dietrich; Jürgen Weber; Julia Dinges; Elisabeth Mützel; Maximilian F Reiser; Christian Glaser
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2009-04-01       Impact factor: 2.310

Review 10.  Cartilage repair surgery: outcome evaluation by using noninvasive cartilage biomarkers based on quantitative MRI techniques?

Authors:  Pia M Jungmann; Thomas Baum; Jan S Bauer; Dimitrios C Karampinos; Benjamin Erdle; Thomas M Link; Xiaojuan Li; Siegfried Trattnig; Ernst J Rummeny; Klaus Woertler; Goetz H Welsch
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-05-04       Impact factor: 3.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.