Literature DB >> 18792110

Recognition of familiar melodies by adult cochlear implant recipients and normal-hearing adults.

Kate Gfeller1, Christopher Turner, Maureen Mehr, George Woodworth, Robert Fearn, John F Knutson, Shelley Witt, Julie Stordahl.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare melody recognition and pitch perception of adult cochlear implant recipients and normal-hearing adults and to identify factors that influence the ability of implant users to recognize familiar melodies. Forty-nine experienced cochlear implant recipients and 18 normal-hearing adults were tested on familiar melody recognition. The normal-hearing adults were significantly (p < 0.0001) more accurate than implant recipients. Implant recipients showed considerable variability in perception of complex tones and pure tones. There were significant negative correlations between melody recognition, age at the time of testing, length of profound deafness and complex-tone perception, and significant positive relations between melody recognition and speech recognition scores.

Entities:  

Year:  2002        PMID: 18792110     DOI: 10.1179/cim.2002.3.1.29

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cochlear Implants Int        ISSN: 1467-0100


  72 in total

1.  Melody identification for cochlear implant users and normal hearers using expanded pitch contours.

Authors:  Frank Michael Digeser; Anne Hast; Thomas Wesarg; Horst Hessel; Ulrich Hoppe
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2011-12-23       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Improving melody recognition in cochlear implant recipients through individualized frequency map fitting.

Authors:  Walter Di Nardo; Alessandro Scorpecci; Sara Giannantonio; Francesca Cianfrone; Gaetano Paludetti
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2010-07-16       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Correlations Between Pitch and Phoneme Perception in Cochlear Implant Users and Their Normal Hearing Peers.

Authors:  Raymond L Goldsworthy
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2015-09-15

4.  Cochlear implant users' spectral ripple resolution.

Authors:  Eun Kyung Jeon; Christopher W Turner; Sue A Karsten; Belinda A Henry; Bruce J Gantz
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Music perception and appraisal: cochlear implant users and simulated cochlear implant listening.

Authors:  Rose Wright; Rosalie M Uchanski
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 1.664

6.  Discrimination of Schroeder-phase harmonic complexes by normal-hearing and cochlear-implant listeners.

Authors:  Ward R Drennan; Jeff K Longnion; Chad Ruffin; Jay T Rubinstein
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2007-12-08

7.  Spectral and temporal cues for speech recognition: implications for auditory prostheses.

Authors:  Li Xu; Bryan E Pfingst
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2007-12-28       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 8.  Combined acoustic and electric hearing: preserving residual acoustic hearing.

Authors:  Christopher W Turner; Lina A J Reiss; Bruce J Gantz
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2007-11-29       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  MUSIC APPRECIATION AND TRAINING FOR COCHLEAR IMPLANT RECIPIENTS: A REVIEW.

Authors:  Valerie Looi; Kate Gfeller; Virginia Driscoll
Journal:  Semin Hear       Date:  2012-11-19

10.  Temporal stability of music perception and appraisal scores of adult cochlear implant recipients.

Authors:  Kate Gfeller; Dingfeng Jiang; Jacob J Oleson; Virginia Driscoll; John F Knutson
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 1.664

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.