Literature DB >> 22193870

Melody identification for cochlear implant users and normal hearers using expanded pitch contours.

Frank Michael Digeser1, Anne Hast, Thomas Wesarg, Horst Hessel, Ulrich Hoppe.   

Abstract

Music perception is considered unsatisfactory for most cochlear implant (CI) users. Usually, rhythm identification is adequate while pitch and melody recognition are rather limited. The aim of this study was to investigate whether insufficient contour information in the low-frequency range is one cause that contributes to the poor melody recognition results in CI users. For this purpose, the recognition of familiar melodies was tested with three differently expanded pitch contours. Ten cochlear implant subjects and five normal-hearing (NH) volunteers were investigated. Each subject chose ten out of a possible set of 23 well-known nursery songs without verbal cues. The songs were played in the original version and with three different pitch-contour expansions. All versions were tested with and without rhythm and in random order. CI subjects exhibited best results when melodies were presented with expanded pitch contours, although no clear preference for a specific contour modification was observed. Normal-hearing subjects exhibited poorer results for expanded pitch contours, especially when testing without rhythm. Both NH and CI-user groups exhibited large inter-individual differences, and melody recognition with rhythm was always better than melody recognition without rhythm. Insufficient contour information in the low-frequency range is confirmed as one contributing cause for the poor melody recognition results in CI users. Therefore, other efforts to improve low-frequency pitch discrimination, e.g., a more sophisticated design of the electrode array, a focus of the electrical stimulation pattern or an improved signal processing scheme could potentially improve melody recognition as well.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22193870     DOI: 10.1007/s00405-011-1885-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0937-4477            Impact factor:   2.503


  27 in total

1.  Ability of nucleus cochlear implantees to recognize music.

Authors:  S Fujita; J Ito
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 1.547

2.  Pitch ranking with deeply inserted electrode arrays.

Authors:  Uwe Baumann; Andrea Nobbe
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  Relative contributions of temporal and place pitch cues to fundamental frequency discrimination in cochlear implantees.

Authors:  Johan Laneau; Jan Wouters; Marc Moonen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Place-pitch discrimination of single- versus dual-electrode stimuli by cochlear implant users (L).

Authors:  Gail S Donaldson; Heather A Kreft; Leonid Litvak
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Dual-electrode pitch discrimination with sequential interleaved stimulation by cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Bom Jun Kwon; Chris van den Honert
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  The cochlear implant electrode-pitch function.

Authors:  Uwe Baumann; Andrea Nobbe
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2006-01-25       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  Improved fundamental frequency coding in cochlear implant signal processing.

Authors:  Matthias Milczynski; Jan Wouters; Astrid van Wieringen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Labeling of musical interval size by cochlear implant patients and normally hearing subjects.

Authors:  S Pijl
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 3.570

Review 9.  Are cochlear implant patients suffering from perceptual dissonance?

Authors:  Gerald E Loeb
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  Appreciation of music in adult patients with cochlear implants: a patient questionnaire.

Authors:  S Mirza; S A Douglas; P Lindsey; T Hildreth; M Hawthorne
Journal:  Cochlear Implants Int       Date:  2003-06
View more
  1 in total

1.  Auditory perception skills in children receiving simultaneous bilateral cochlear implants: early speech-discrimination results.

Authors:  Selvet Akkaplan; Merve Ozbal Batuk; Gonca Sennaroglu
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2021-01-04       Impact factor: 2.503

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.