Literature DB >> 18779988

Beneficial fitness effects are not exponential for two viruses.

Darin R Rokyta1, Craig J Beisel, Paul Joyce, Martin T Ferris, Christina L Burch, Holly A Wichman.   

Abstract

The distribution of fitness effects for beneficial mutations is of paramount importance in determining the outcome of adaptation. It is generally assumed that fitness effects of beneficial mutations follow an exponential distribution, for example, in theoretical treatments of quantitative genetics, clonal interference, experimental evolution, and the adaptation of DNA sequences. This assumption has been justified by the statistical theory of extreme values, because the fitnesses conferred by beneficial mutations should represent samples from the extreme right tail of the fitness distribution. Yet in extreme value theory, there are three different limiting forms for right tails of distributions, and the exponential describes only those of distributions in the Gumbel domain of attraction. Using beneficial mutations from two viruses, we show for the first time that the Gumbel domain can be rejected in favor of a distribution with a right-truncated tail, thus providing evidence for an upper bound on fitness effects. Our data also violate the common assumption that small-effect beneficial mutations greatly outnumber those of large effect, as they are consistent with a uniform distribution of beneficial effects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18779988      PMCID: PMC2600421          DOI: 10.1007/s00239-008-9153-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Evol        ISSN: 0022-2844            Impact factor:   2.395


  22 in total

1.  Fitness effects of advantageous mutations in evolving Escherichia coli populations.

Authors:  M Imhof; C Schlotterer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-01-30       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Models of experimental evolution: the role of genetic chance and selective necessity.

Authors:  L M Wahl; D C Krakauer
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  The distribution of fitness effects among beneficial mutations.

Authors:  H Allen Orr
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  The population genetics of adaptation: the adaptation of DNA sequences.

Authors:  H Allen Orr
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 3.694

5.  Fitness effects of fixed beneficial mutations in microbial populations.

Authors:  Daniel E Rozen; J Arjan G M de Visser; Philip J Gerrish
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2002-06-25       Impact factor: 10.834

6.  The distribution of fitness effects caused by single-nucleotide substitutions in an RNA virus.

Authors:  Rafael Sanjuán; Andrés Moya; Santiago F Elena
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-05-24       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  The speed of adaptation in large asexual populations.

Authors:  Claus O Wilke
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Testing the extreme value domain of attraction for distributions of beneficial fitness effects.

Authors:  Craig J Beisel; Darin R Rokyta; Holly A Wichman; Paul Joyce
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2007-06-11       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Limits of adaptation: the evolution of selective neutrality.

Authors:  D L Hartl; D E Dykhuizen; A M Dean
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1985-11       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  A simple stochastic gene substitution model.

Authors:  J H Gillespie
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  1983-04       Impact factor: 1.570

View more
  57 in total

1.  Stickbreaking: a novel fitness landscape model that harbors epistasis and is consistent with commonly observed patterns of adaptive evolution.

Authors:  Anna C Nagel; Paul Joyce; Holly A Wichman; Craig R Miller
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2011-11-17       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Real time forecasting of near-future evolution.

Authors:  Philip J Gerrish; Paul D Sniegowski
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2012-04-18       Impact factor: 4.118

3.  Distribution of fixed beneficial mutations and the rate of adaptation in asexual populations.

Authors:  Benjamin H Good; Igor M Rouzine; Daniel J Balick; Oskar Hallatschek; Michael M Desai
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-02-27       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  The population genetics of antibiotic resistance: integrating molecular mechanisms and treatment contexts.

Authors:  R Craig MacLean; Alex R Hall; Gabriel G Perron; Angus Buckling
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 53.242

Review 5.  Mutational fitness effects in RNA and single-stranded DNA viruses: common patterns revealed by site-directed mutagenesis studies.

Authors:  Rafael Sanjuán
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-06-27       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 6.  Beneficial mutations and the dynamics of adaptation in asexual populations.

Authors:  Paul D Sniegowski; Philip J Gerrish
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-04-27       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 7.  The population genetics of beneficial mutations.

Authors:  H Allen Orr
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-04-27       Impact factor: 6.237

8.  Mutational effects and population dynamics during viral adaptation challenge current models.

Authors:  Craig R Miller; Paul Joyce; Holly A Wichman
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2010-11-01       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Inference for one-step beneficial mutations using next generation sequencing.

Authors:  Andrzej J Wojtowicz; Craig R Miller; Paul Joyce
Journal:  Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol       Date:  2015-02

10.  Multiple genetic pathways to similar fitness limits during viral adaptation to a new host.

Authors:  Andre H Nguyen; Ian J Molineux; Rachael Springman; James J Bull
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2011-09-20       Impact factor: 3.694

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.