Literature DB >> 22513725

Real time forecasting of near-future evolution.

Philip J Gerrish1, Paul D Sniegowski.   

Abstract

A metaphor for adaptation that informs much evolutionary thinking today is that of mountain climbing, where horizontal displacement represents change in genotype, and vertical displacement represents change in fitness. If it were known a priori what the 'fitness landscape' looked like, that is, how the myriad possible genotypes mapped onto fitness, then the possible paths up the fitness mountain could each be assigned a probability, thus providing a dynamical theory with long-term predictive power. Such detailed genotype-fitness data, however, are rarely available and are subject to change with each change in the organism or in the environment. Here, we take a very different approach that depends only on fitness or phenotype-fitness data obtained in real time and requires no a priori information about the fitness landscape. Our general statistical model of adaptive evolution builds on classical theory and gives reasonable predictions of fitness and phenotype evolution many generations into the future.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22513725      PMCID: PMC3405757          DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2012.0119

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J R Soc Interface        ISSN: 1742-5662            Impact factor:   4.118


  53 in total

1.  RNA virus evolution via a fitness-space model.

Authors: 
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  1996-06-03       Impact factor: 9.161

2.  The noisy edge of traveling waves.

Authors:  Oskar Hallatschek
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-12-27       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  An empirical test of the mutational landscape model of adaptation using a single-stranded DNA virus.

Authors:  Darin R Rokyta; Paul Joyce; S Brian Caudle; Holly A Wichman
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2005-03-20       Impact factor: 38.330

4.  The stochastic edge in adaptive evolution.

Authors:  Eric Brunet; Igor M Rouzine; Claus O Wilke
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  The fate of competing beneficial mutations in an asexual population.

Authors:  P J Gerrish; R E Lenski
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 1.082

6.  Metabolic trade-offs and the maintenance of the fittest and the flattest.

Authors:  Robert E Beardmore; Ivana Gudelj; David A Lipson; Laurence D Hurst
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2011-03-27       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Fisher's fundamental theorem of natural selection.

Authors:  S A Frank; M Slatkin
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 17.712

8.  Protein evolution on rugged landscapes.

Authors:  C A Macken; A S Perelson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Protein evolution on partially correlated landscapes.

Authors:  A S Perelson; C A Macken
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1995-10-10       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 10.  Selforganization of matter and the evolution of biological macromolecules.

Authors:  M Eigen
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  1971-10
View more
  6 in total

1.  Genomic mutation rates that neutralize adaptive evolution and natural selection.

Authors:  Philip J Gerrish; Alexandre Colato; Paul D Sniegowski
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2013-05-29       Impact factor: 4.118

2.  Dynamics and Fate of Beneficial Mutations Under Lineage Contamination by Linked Deleterious Mutations.

Authors:  Sophie Pénisson; Tanya Singh; Paul Sniegowski; Philip Gerrish
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2017-01-18       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  The Nonstationary Dynamics of Fitness Distributions: Asexual Model with Epistasis and Standing Variation.

Authors:  Guillaume Martin; Lionel Roques
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2016-10-21       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 4.  Cancer in light of experimental evolution.

Authors:  Kathleen Sprouffske; Lauren M F Merlo; Philip J Gerrish; Carlo C Maley; Paul D Sniegowski
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2012-09-11       Impact factor: 10.834

Review 5.  Empirical fitness landscapes and the predictability of evolution.

Authors:  J Arjan G M de Visser; Joachim Krug
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2014-06-10       Impact factor: 53.242

6.  Forecasting emergence of COVID-19 variants of concern.

Authors:  James Kyle Miller; Kimberly Elenberg; Artur Dubrawski
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-02-24       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.