Literature DB >> 18777923

Automated breast mass detection in 3D reconstructed tomosynthesis volumes: a featureless approach.

Swatee Singh1, Georgia D Tourassi, Jay A Baker, Ehsan Samei, Joseph Y Lo.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to propose and implement a computer aided detection (CADe) tool for breast tomosynthesis. This task was accomplished in two stages-a highly sensitive mass detector followed by a false positive (FP) reduction stage. Breast tomosynthesis data from 100 human subject cases were used, of which 25 subjects had one or more mass lesions and the rest were normal. For stage 1, filter parameters were optimized via a grid search. The CADe identified suspicious locations were reconstructed to yield 3D CADe volumes of interest. The first stage yielded a maximum sensitivity of 93% with 7.7 FPs/breast volume. Unlike traditional CADe algorithms in which the second stage FP reduction is done via feature extraction and analysis, instead information theory principles were used with mutual information as a similarity metric. Three schemes were proposed, all using leave-one-case-out cross validation sampling. The three schemes, A, B, and C, differed in the composition of their knowledge base of regions of interest (ROIs). Scheme A's knowledge base was comprised of all the mass and FP ROIs generated by the first stage of the algorithm. Scheme B had a knowledge base that contained information from mass ROIs and randomly extracted normal ROIs. Scheme C had information from three sources of information-masses, FPs, and normal ROIs. Also, performance was assessed as a function of the composition of the knowledge base in terms of the number of FP or normal ROIs needed by the system to reach optimal performance. The results indicated that the knowledge base needed no more than 20 times as many FPs and 30 times as many normal ROIs as masses to attain maximal performance. The best overall system performance was 85% sensitivity with 2.4 FPs per breast volume for scheme A, 3.6 FPs per breast volume for scheme B, and 3 FPs per breast volume for scheme C.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18777923      PMCID: PMC2673649          DOI: 10.1118/1.2953562

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  34 in total

1.  Segmentation of suspicious clustered microcalcifications in mammograms.

Authors:  M A Gavrielides; J Y Lo; R Vargas-Voracek; C E Floyd
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  A CAD system for the automatic detection of clustered microcalcifications in digitized mammogram films.

Authors:  S Yu; L Guan
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 10.048

3.  False-positive reduction in computer-aided diagnostic scheme for detecting nodules in chest radiographs by means of massive training artificial neural network.

Authors:  Kenji Suzuki; Junji Shiraishi; Hiroyuki Abe; Heber MacMahon; Kunio Doi
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 3.173

4.  Dual system approach to computer-aided detection of breast masses on mammograms.

Authors:  Jun Wei; Heang-Ping Chan; Berkman Sahiner; Lubomir M Hadjiiski; Mark A Helvie; Marilyn A Roubidoux; Chuan Zhou; Jun Ge
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Multiprojection correlation imaging for improved detection of pulmonary nodules.

Authors:  Ehsan Samei; Stanton A Stebbins; James T Dobbins; H Page McAdams; Joseph Y Lo
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 3.959

6.  Information-theoretic CAD system in mammography: entropy-based indexing for computational efficiency and robust performance.

Authors:  Georgia D Tourassi; Brian Harrawood; Swatee Singh; Joseph Y Lo
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Bilateral analysis based false positive reduction for computer-aided mass detection.

Authors:  Yi-Ta Wu; Jun Wei; Lubomir M Hadjiiski; Berkman Sahiner; Chuan Zhou; Jun Ge; Jiazheng Shi; Yiheng Zhang; Heang-Ping Chan
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  Feature selection for computerized mass detection in digitized mammograms by using a genetic algorithm.

Authors:  B Zheng; Y H Chang; X H Wang; W F Good; D Gur
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 3.173

9.  Digital breast tomosynthesis: initial experience in 98 women with abnormal digital screening mammography.

Authors:  Steven P Poplack; Tor D Tosteson; Christine A Kogel; Helene M Nagy
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 3.959

10.  Importance of point-by-point back projection correction for isocentric motion in digital breast tomosynthesis: relevance to morphology of structures such as microcalcifications.

Authors:  Ying Chen; Joseph Y Lo; James T Dobbins
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 4.071

View more
  11 in total

1.  Computer-aided detection of clustered microcalcifications in digital breast tomosynthesis: a 3D approach.

Authors:  Berkman Sahiner; Heang-Ping Chan; Lubomir M Hadjiiski; Mark A Helvie; Jun Wei; Chuan Zhou; Yao Lu
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Automated detection of mass lesions in dedicated breast CT: a preliminary study.

Authors:  I Reiser; R M Nishikawa; M L Giger; J M Boone; K K Lindfors; K Yang
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 3.  A review of breast tomosynthesis. Part II. Image reconstruction, processing and analysis, and advanced applications.

Authors:  Ioannis Sechopoulos
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 4.  Digital mammography imaging: breast tomosynthesis and advanced applications.

Authors:  Mark A Helvie
Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.303

Review 5.  Clinical implementation of digital breast tomosynthesis.

Authors:  Emily F Conant
Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am       Date:  2014-02-18       Impact factor: 2.303

6.  Mutual information-based template matching scheme for detection of breast masses: from mammography to digital breast tomosynthesis.

Authors:  Maciej A Mazurowski; Joseph Y Lo; Brian P Harrawood; Georgia D Tourassi
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2011-05-01       Impact factor: 6.317

7.  Digital breast tomosynthesis: lessons learned from early clinical implementation.

Authors:  Robyn Gartner Roth; Andrew D A Maidment; Susan P Weinstein; Susan Orel Roth; Emily F Conant
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2014 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.333

8.  The clinical utility of automated breast volume scanner: a pilot study of 139 cases.

Authors:  Young Wook Kim; Seon Kwang Kim; Hyun Jo Youn; Eun Jung Choi; Sung Hoo Jung
Journal:  J Breast Cancer       Date:  2013-09-30       Impact factor: 3.588

9.  Three-Dimensional Computer-Aided Detection of Microcalcification Clusters in Digital Breast Tomosynthesis.

Authors:  Ji-Wook Jeong; Seung-Hoon Chae; Eun Young Chae; Hak Hee Kim; Young-Wook Choi; Sooyeul Lee
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2016-05-04       Impact factor: 3.411

10.  Wavelet-based 3D reconstruction of microcalcification clusters from two mammographic views: new evidence that fractal tumors are malignant and Euclidean tumors are benign.

Authors:  Kendra A Batchelder; Aaron B Tanenbaum; Seth Albert; Lyne Guimond; Pierre Kestener; Alain Arneodo; Andre Khalil
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-09-15       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.