Literature DB >> 25019451

Digital breast tomosynthesis: lessons learned from early clinical implementation.

Robyn Gartner Roth1, Andrew D A Maidment, Susan P Weinstein, Susan Orel Roth, Emily F Conant.   

Abstract

The limitations of mammography are well known and are partly related to the fact that with conventional imaging, the three-dimensional volume of the breast is imaged and presented in a two-dimensional format. Because normal breast tissue is similar in x-ray attenuation to some breast cancers, clinically relevant malignancies may be obscured by normal overlapping tissue. In addition, complex areas of normal tissue may be perceived as suspicious. The limitations of two-dimensional breast imaging lead to low sensitivity in detecting some cancers and high false-positive recall rates. Although mammographic screening has been shown to reduce breast cancer deaths by approximately 30%, controversy exists over when and how often screening mammography should occur. Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) is rapidly being implemented in breast imaging clinics around the world as early clinical data demonstrate that it may address some of the limitations of conventional mammography. With DBT, multiple low-dose x-ray images are acquired in an arc and reconstructed to create a three-dimensional image, thus minimizing the impact of overlapping breast tissue and improving lesion conspicuity. Early studies of screening DBT have shown decreased false-positive callback rates and increased rates of cancer detection (particularly for invasive cancers), resulting in increased sensitivity and specificity. In our clinical practice, we have completed more than 2 years of using two-view digital mammography combined with two-view DBT for all screening and select diagnostic imaging examinations (over 25,000 patients). Our experience, combined with previously published data, demonstrates that the combined use of DBT and digital mammography is associated with improved outcomes for screening and diagnostic imaging. Online supplemental material is available for this article. ©RSNA, 2014.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25019451      PMCID: PMC4319526          DOI: 10.1148/rg.344130087

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiographics        ISSN: 0271-5333            Impact factor:   5.333


  38 in total

1.  Computerized mass detection for digital breast tomosynthesis directly from the projection images.

Authors:  I Reiser; R M Nishikawa; M L Giger; T Wu; E A Rafferty; R Moore; D B Kopans
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Implementation of breast tomosynthesis in a routine screening practice: an observational study.

Authors:  Stephen L Rose; Andra L Tidwell; Louis J Bujnoch; Anne C Kushwaha; Amy S Nordmann; Russell Sexton
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 3.959

3.  Digital breast tomosynthesis: observer performance study.

Authors:  David Gur; Gordon S Abrams; Denise M Chough; Marie A Ganott; Christiane M Hakim; Ronald L Perrin; Grace Y Rathfon; Jules H Sumkin; Margarita L Zuley; Andriy I Bandos
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 3.959

4.  Computer-aided detection of masses in digital tomosynthesis mammography: comparison of three approaches.

Authors:  Heang-Ping Chan; Jun Wei; Yiheng Zhang; Mark A Helvie; Richard H Moore; Berkman Sahiner; Lubomir Hadjiiski; Daniel B Kopans
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Automated breast mass detection in 3D reconstructed tomosynthesis volumes: a featureless approach.

Authors:  Swatee Singh; Georgia D Tourassi; Jay A Baker; Ehsan Samei; Joseph Y Lo
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Automated detection of microcalcification clusters for digital breast tomosynthesis using projection data only: a preliminary study.

Authors:  I Reiser; R M Nishikawa; A V Edwards; D B Kopans; R A Schmidt; J Papaioannou; R H Moore
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 7.  Systematic review: the long-term effects of false-positive mammograms.

Authors:  Noel T Brewer; Talya Salz; Sarah E Lillie
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2007-04-03       Impact factor: 25.391

8.  Diagnostic performance of digital versus film mammography for breast-cancer screening.

Authors:  Etta D Pisano; Constantine Gatsonis; Edward Hendrick; Martin Yaffe; Janet K Baum; Suddhasatta Acharyya; Emily F Conant; Laurie L Fajardo; Lawrence Bassett; Carl D'Orsi; Roberta Jong; Murray Rebner
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2005-09-16       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Computer-aided detection system for breast masses on digital tomosynthesis mammograms: preliminary experience.

Authors:  Heang-Ping Chan; Jun Wei; Berkman Sahiner; Elizabeth A Rafferty; Tao Wu; Marilyn A Roubidoux; Richard H Moore; Daniel B Kopans; Lubomir M Hadjiiski; Mark A Helvie
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2005-10-19       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Digital breast tomosynthesis: initial experience in 98 women with abnormal digital screening mammography.

Authors:  Steven P Poplack; Tor D Tosteson; Christine A Kogel; Helene M Nagy
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 3.959

View more
  14 in total

1.  Quantitative assessment of microcalcification cluster image quality in digital breast tomosynthesis, 2-dimensional and synthetic mammography.

Authors:  Andreas E Petropoulos; Spyros G Skiadopoulos; Anna N Karahaliou; Gerasimos A T Messaris; Nikolaos S Arikidis; Lena I Costaridou
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2019-12-07       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  A method for the automated classification of benign and malignant masses on digital breast tomosynthesis images using machine learning and radiomic features.

Authors:  Ayaka Sakai; Yuya Onishi; Misaki Matsui; Hidetoshi Adachi; Atsushi Teramoto; Kuniaki Saito; Hiroshi Fujita
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2019-11-04

Review 3.  Is the false-positive rate in mammography in North America too high?

Authors:  Michelle T Le; Carmel E Mothersill; Colin B Seymour; Fiona E McNeill
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-06-08       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 4.  Calcifications at Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: Imaging Features and Biopsy Techniques.

Authors:  Joao V Horvat; Delia M Keating; Halio Rodrigues-Duarte; Elizabeth A Morris; Victoria L Mango
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2019-01-25       Impact factor: 5.333

5.  Added Value of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Combined with Digital Mammography According to Reader Agreement: Changes in BI-RADS Rate and Follow-Up Management.

Authors:  Francesca Galati; Flaminia Marzocca; Erica Bassetti; Maria L Luciani; Sharon Tan; Carlo Catalano; Federica Pediconi
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2017-08-29       Impact factor: 2.860

Review 6.  Strategies to Increase Cancer Detection: Review of True-Positive and False-Negative Results at Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Screening.

Authors:  Katrina E Korhonen; Susan P Weinstein; Elizabeth S McDonald; Emily F Conant
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2016-10-07       Impact factor: 5.333

7.  2D or Synthetic 2D? A Reader Study of Visualization of Amorphous Calcifications.

Authors:  Andrew Renaldo; Matthew Miller; Matthew Caley; Ramapriya Ganti; James Patrie; Carrie Rochman; Jonathan V Nguyen
Journal:  J Breast Imaging       Date:  2022-01-20

Review 8.  Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: an Overview.

Authors:  Ekta Dhamija; Malvika Gulati; S V S Deo; Ajay Gogia; Smriti Hari
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-05-15

9.  Awareness, Interest, and Preferences of Primary Care Providers in Using Point-of-Care Cancer Screening Technology.

Authors:  Chloe S Kim; Sarah Vanture; Margaret Cho; Catherine M Klapperich; Catharine Wang; Franklin W Huang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-01-15       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Dedicated Three-dimensional Breast Computed Tomography: Lesion Characteristic Perception by Radiologists.

Authors:  Cherie Marie Kuzmiak; Elodia B Cole; Donglin Zeng; Laura A Tuttle; Doreen Steed; Etta D Pisano
Journal:  J Clin Imaging Sci       Date:  2016-03-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.