Literature DB >> 24792652

Clinical implementation of digital breast tomosynthesis.

Emily F Conant1.   

Abstract

Digital breast tomosynthesis is rapidly being implemented in breast imaging clinics across the world as early clinical data demonstrate that this innovative technology may address some of the long-standing limitations of conventional mammography. This article reviews the recent clinical data supporting digital breast tomosynthesis implementation, the basics of digital breast tomosynthesis image interpretation using case-based illustrations, and potential issues to consider as this new technology is integrated into daily clinical use.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast cancer; Breast imaging; Digital breast tomosynthesis; Digital mammography; Screening mammography

Mesh：

Year:  2014        PMID： 24792652      PMCID： PMC4128330          DOI： 10.1016/j.rcl.2013.11.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am        ISSN： 0033-8389            Impact factor:   2.303


  40 in total

1.  Implementation of breast tomosynthesis in a routine screening practice: an observational study.

Authors:  Stephen L Rose; Andra L Tidwell; Louis J Bujnoch; Anne C Kushwaha; Amy S Nordmann; Russell Sexton
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 3.959

2.  Digital breast tomosynthesis versus supplemental diagnostic mammographic views for evaluation of noncalcified breast lesions.

Authors:  Margarita L Zuley; Andriy I Bandos; Marie A Ganott; Jules H Sumkin; Amy E Kelly; Victor J Catullo; Grace Y Rathfon; Amy H Lu; David Gur
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2012-11-09       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Can digital breast tomosynthesis replace conventional diagnostic mammography views for screening recalls without calcifications? A comparison study in a simulated clinical setting.

Authors:  Kathleen R Brandt; Daniel A Craig; Tanya L Hoskins; Tara L Henrichsen; Emily C Bendel; Stephanie R Brandt; Jay Mandrekar
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 3.959

4.  Comparison of digital mammography alone and digital mammography plus tomosynthesis in a population-based screening program.

Authors:  Per Skaane; Andriy I Bandos; Randi Gullien; Ellen B Eben; Ulrika Ekseth; Unni Haakenaasen; Mina Izadi; Ingvild N Jebsen; Gunnar Jahr; Mona Krager; Loren T Niklason; Solveig Hofvind; David Gur
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2013-01-07       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Comparison of tomosynthesis plus digital mammography and digital mammography alone for breast cancer screening.

Authors:  Brian M Haas; Vivek Kalra; Jaime Geisel; Madhavi Raghu; Melissa Durand; Liane E Philpotts
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2013-10-28       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Diagnostic performance of digital versus film mammography for breast-cancer screening.

Authors:  Etta D Pisano; Constantine Gatsonis; Edward Hendrick; Martin Yaffe; Janet K Baum; Suddhasatta Acharyya; Emily F Conant; Laurie L Fajardo; Lawrence Bassett; Carl D'Orsi; Roberta Jong; Murray Rebner
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2005-09-16       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Computer-aided detection system for breast masses on digital tomosynthesis mammograms: preliminary experience.

Authors:  Heang-Ping Chan; Jun Wei; Berkman Sahiner; Elizabeth A Rafferty; Tao Wu; Marilyn A Roubidoux; Richard H Moore; Daniel B Kopans; Lubomir M Hadjiiski; Mark A Helvie
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2005-10-19       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Value of one-view breast tomosynthesis versus two-view mammography in diagnostic workup of women with clinical signs and symptoms and in women recalled from screening.

Authors:  Christian Waldherr; Peter Cerny; Hans J Altermatt; Gilles Berclaz; Michele Ciriolo; Katharina Buser; Martin J Sonnenschein
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 9.  Overview of the evidence on digital breast tomosynthesis in breast cancer detection.

Authors:  Nehmat Houssami; Per Skaane
Journal:  Breast       Date:  2013-02-16       Impact factor: 4.380

10.  UKCCCR multicentre randomised controlled trial of one and two view mammography in breast cancer screening.

Authors:  N J Wald; P Murphy; P Major; C Parkes; J Townsend; C Frost
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-11-04
View more
  14 in total

1.  Fully Automated Quantitative Estimation of Volumetric Breast Density from Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Images: Preliminary Results and Comparison with Digital Mammography and MR Imaging.

Authors:  Said Pertuz; Elizabeth S McDonald; Susan P Weinstein; Emily F Conant; Despina Kontos
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2015-10-21       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Problem-solving breast MRI: useful or a source of new problems?

Authors:  Füsun Taşkın; Yasemin Polat; İbrahim H Erdoğdu; Figen T Türkdoğan; Veli Suha Öztürk; Serdar Özbaş
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 2.630

Review 3.  Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: Concepts and Clinical Practice.

Authors:  Alice Chong; Susan P Weinstein; Elizabeth S McDonald; Emily F Conant
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2019-05-14       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Comparison of synthetic and digital mammography with digital breast tomosynthesis or alone for the detection and classification of microcalcifications.

Authors:  Ji Soo Choi; Boo-Kyung Han; Eun Young Ko; Ga Ram Kim; Eun Sook Ko; Ko Woon Park
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-06-21       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  The Effect of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Adoption on Facility-Level Breast Cancer Screening Volume.

Authors:  Christoph I Lee; Weiwei Zhu; Tracy L Onega; Jessica Germino; Ellen S O'Meara; Constance D Lehman; Louise M Henderson; Jennifer S Haas; Karla Kerlikowske; Brian L Sprague; Garth H Rauscher; Anna N A Tosteson; Jennifer Alford-Teaster; Karen J Wernli; Diana L Miglioretti
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2018-09-20       Impact factor: 3.959

6.  Association between breast cancer, breast density, and body adiposity evaluated by MRI.

Authors:  Wenlian Zhu; Peng Huang; Katarzyna J Macura; Dmitri Artemov
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-10-21       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Prospective study aiming to compare 2D mammography and tomosynthesis + synthesized mammography in terms of cancer detection and recall. From double reading of 2D mammography to single reading of tomosynthesis.

Authors:  Sara Romero Martín; Jose Luis Raya Povedano; María Cara García; Ana Luz Santos Romero; Margarita Pedrosa Garriguet; Marina Álvarez Benito
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-01-02       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Association between Breast Parenchymal Complexity and False-Positive Recall From Digital Mammography Versus Breast Tomosynthesis: Preliminary Investigation in the ACRIN PA 4006 Trial.

Authors:  Shonket Ray; Lin Chen; Brad M Keller; Jinbo Chen; Emily F Conant; Despina Kontos
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2016-05-25       Impact factor: 3.173

9.  Comparison between two-dimensional synthetic mammography reconstructed from digital breast tomosynthesis and full-field digital mammography for the detection of T1 breast cancer.

Authors:  Ji Soo Choi; Boo-Kyung Han; Eun Young Ko; Eun Sook Ko; Soo Yeon Hahn; Jung Hee Shin; Min Jung Kim
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-12-01       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  Five Consecutive Years of Screening with Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: Outcomes by Screening Year and Round.

Authors:  Emily F Conant; Samantha P Zuckerman; Elizabeth S McDonald; Susan P Weinstein; Katrina E Korhonen; Julia A Birnbaum; Jennifer D Tobey; Mitchell D Schnall; Rebecca A Hubbard
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2020-03-10       Impact factor: 11.105
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.