| Literature DB >> 18773084 |
Francesca Luca1, Giuseppina Bubba, Massimo Basile, Radim Brdicka, Emmanuel Michalodimitrakis, Olga Rickards, Galina Vershubsky, Lluis Quintana-Murci, Andrey I Kozlov, Andrea Novelletto.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Genetic variation at NAT2 has been long recognized as the cause of differential ability to metabolize a wide variety of drugs of therapeutic use. Here, we explore the pattern of genetic variation in 12 human populations that significantly extend the geographic range and resolution of previous surveys, to test the hypothesis that different dietary regimens and lifestyles may explain inter-population differences in NAT2 variation. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPALEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2008 PMID: 18773084 PMCID: PMC2527519 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0003136
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Figure 1Map of the old world showing the sampling locations for the populations here examined.
Each pie represents the percentage of the slow (white), intermediate (grey), and fast (black) acetylators in the extended panel, inferred from genotype data as described in Materials and Methods. Inset: map showing the frequency of slow (white) and fast (black) haplotypes as inferred based on biochemical data [6].
Summary statistics of NAT2 diversity in the continental samples of the resequencing panel.
| Population | N1 | Hd2 | Theta(pi)% | Theta(pi)% (Syn) | Theta(pi)% (NSyn) | Theta(s)% | Theta(s)% (Syn) | Theta(s)% (NSyn) | TD3 | Fay&Wu H |
| Africa | 32 | 0.562 | 0.251 | 0.439 | 0.197 | 0.142 | 0.250 | 0.111 | 2.050** ^̂## | −0.456 |
| Europe | 88 | 0.768* ^̂## | 0.267 | 0.465 | 0.210 | 0.136 | 0.200 | 0.118 | 2.213** ^̂## | +0.899*## |
| Asia | 76 | 0.829*** ^̂̂### | 0.271 | 0.455 | 0.218 | 0.164 | 0.206 | 0.152 | 1.607* ^ | +1.396* ^̂̂### |
| All | 196 | 0.775 | 0.273 | 0.465 | 0.217 | 0.137 | 0.172 | 0.127 | 2.110 | +1.027 |
1. Number of gene copies; 2.Haplotype diversity; 3. Tajima's D.
Neutrality test significance under demographic model (see Materials and Methods):
Exponential growth, *0.1
Bottleneck A, ^0.1
Bottleneck B, #0.1
Relative haplotype frequencies in 12 population samples.
| 282 | 341 | 481 | 590 | 803 | 857 | Activity | Dendi | Amhara | Oromo | Egyptians | Italians | Greeks | Czechs | Mordvin | Russian | Khanty Mansi | Yakuts | Chukchee | |
| Syn | N-s | Syn | N-s | N-s | N-s | ||||||||||||||
| N (subjects) | 11 | 15 | 12 | 37 | 37 | 40 | 27 | 14 | 12 | 14 | 16 | 13 | |||||||
| Macaque | C | T | C | G | A | G | |||||||||||||
| Chimpanzee | C | T | C | G | A | G | |||||||||||||
| Haplotype | |||||||||||||||||||
| NAT2*4 | . | . | . | . | . | . | F | 0 | 0.06 | 0.08 | 0.12 | 0.24 | 0.21 | 0.2 | 0.21 | 0.33 | 0.14 | 0.38 | 0.35 |
| NAT2*5° | . |
| T | . | . | . | S | 0 | 0 | 0.04 | 0.01 | 0 | 0.01 | 0 | 0 | 0.04 | 0 | 0.03 | 0 |
| NAT2*5B | . |
| T | . | G | . | S | 0.23 | 0.53 | 0.33 | 0.49 | 0.32 | 0.38 | 0.39 | 0.50 | 0.33 | 0.29 | 0.19 | 0.19 |
| NAT2*5C | . |
| . | . | G | . | S | 0.05 | 0 | 0.04 | 0.01 | 0.03 | 0.04 | 0.06 | 0 | 0 | 0.07 | 0 | 0 |
| NAT2*5D | . |
| . | . | . | . | S | 0.05 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.06 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| NAT2*5G | T |
| T | . | G | . | S | 0.05 | 0.03 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| NAT2*5J | T |
| . |
| . | . | S | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.04 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| NAT2*6° | T | . | . |
| . | . | S | 0.27 | 0.27 | 0.21 | 0.27 | 0.34 | 0.29 | 0.26 | 0.11 | 0.08 | 0.11 | 0.25 | 0.27 |
| NAT2*6B | . | . | . |
| . | . | S | 0.09 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.01 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| NAT2*6C | T | . | . |
| G | . | S | 0.05 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.04 |
| NAT2*7° | . | . | . | . | . |
| S | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.01 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.04 |
| NAT2*7B | T | . | . | . | . |
| S | 0 | 0.03 | 0.17 | 0.01 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0 | 0.07 | 0.04 | 0.18 | 0.13 | 0.08 |
| NAT2*11° | . | . | T | . | . | . | F | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.01 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.11 | 0 | 0 |
| NAT2*12° | . | . | . | . | G | . | F | 0.05 | 0.03 | 0.08 | 0.01 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.08 | 0.04 | 0 | 0.04 |
| NAT2*12B | T | . | . | . | G | . | F | 0.05 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.04 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| NAT2*12C | . | . | T | . | G | . | F | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0 | 0.07 | 0 | 0.04 | 0.03 | 0 |
| NAT2*13 | T | . | . | . | . | . | F | 0.14 | 0.03 | 0.04 | 0.07 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0 | 0 |
Allele states at 6 variable nucleotide positions are reported in cols. 2–7. A dot indicates identity with the ancestral state. Alleles associated with reduced activity are reported in boldface. Haplotype classification (Fast/Slow) is reported in col. 8.
Figure 2Median-joining networks of NAT2 haplotypes in the 12 populations of the extended panel.
The relationships between the 17 haplotypes found in the pool of the 12 populations are displayed by the network on top, with nodes of fixed size. Vectors representing each mutation are oriented as shown on top right (e.g. the vector 341 connects haplotypes which differ only at the position 341). Nodes representing fast and slow haplotypes are color-coded in black and grey, respectively. Networks specific for each population are displayed using the same skeleton and omitting only unnecessary links. Node size is proportional to the number of observations. Note that three main features of the overall network are necessary to explain the haplotypic composition of all but two populations (the left-hand “cube” leading to *5B and the right-hand “planes” leading to *7B and *6A), and that in most cases the median vectors of these structures are actually found. In all graphs the ancestral haplotype *4 is identified by a lozenge.
Measures of intra- and inter-population diversity by using different inter-haplotypic distances.
| Source of variation | d.f. | Fast vs. Slow haplotypes | 17 haplotypes | 17 haplotypes and molecular distance |
| Among populations | 11 | 0.0039 | 0.0085 | 0.0196 |
| Within populations | 484 | 0.1941 | 0.3734 | 1.1834 |
| Fixation index | Fst = 0.0196 | Fst = 0.0223 | Φst = 0.0163 | |
| Significance | P = 0.049 | P = 0.001 | P = 0.029 |
Variance components are reported in the body of table.
Test of equality of frequency of 5 NAT2 haplotype series among three major modes of subsistence.
| Series | Subsistence | N | Avg. Freq. (%) | p(Kruskal Wallis test) |
| All Fast | Hunter-gath. | 12 | 52.1 | <.001 |
| Pastoralist | 13 | 35.6 | ||
| Agriculturalist | 22 | 27.3 | ||
| *14 | Hunter-gath. | 12 | 4.2 | .006 |
| Pastoralist | 13 | 0.0 | ||
| Agriculturalist | 22 | 1.4 | ||
| *5 | Hunter-gath. | 12 | 23.0 | .017 |
| Pastoralist | 13 | 27.3 | ||
| Agriculturalist | 22 | 37.2 | ||
| *6 | Hunter-gath. | 12 | 10.6 | <.001 |
| Pastoralist | 13 | 23.3 | ||
| Agriculturalist | 22 | 30.0 | ||
| *7 | Hunter-gath. | 12 | 10.2 | .002 |
| Pastoralist | 13 | 13.7 | ||
| Agriculturalist | 22 | 4.0 |