Literature DB >> 18751812

Effectiveness of an acetabular positioning device in primary total hip arthroplasty.

Douglas E Padgett1, Stephen L Hendrix, Timothy S Mologne, Drew A Peterson, Keith A Holley.   

Abstract

To evaluate the efficacy of a commercially available acetabular positioning device, we performed a prospective evaluation of 40 consecutive patients undergoing primary total hip arthroplasty. All surgery was performed by the same surgeon, in the same operating room, and on the same operating table. The acetabular positioning device was designed to place the component in 45 degrees of abduction. At 6 weeks, all radiographs were evaluated by 3 investigators not involved with the surgery. Each radiograph was evaluated by each reviewer on 3 separate occasions, blinded to the findings of the other reviewer to assess interobserver and intraobserver variability. The mean cup abduction angle was 42.1 degrees, with a range from 23 degrees to 57 degrees (SD 8.3 degrees). Intraobserver and interobserver variability were 0.2 and 0.3 degrees, respectively. The findings of this study demonstrate a wide variability in acetabular cup placement in primary total hip arthroplasty. We believe this is due to movement of the pelvis, which may occur during preparation, draping, and retracting during surgery. We feel surgeons should not rely solely on positioning devices when implanting the acetabular component in total hip arthroplasty. Identification of bone landmarks and determination of superolateral implant coverage noted on preoperative templating is advocated to improve the precision of component position.

Entities:  

Year:  2005        PMID: 18751812      PMCID: PMC2504141          DOI: 10.1007/s11420-005-0109-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  HSS J        ISSN: 1556-3316


  11 in total

1.  The effect of acetabular cup orientations on limiting hip rotation.

Authors:  F J Kummer; S Shah; S Iyer; P E DiCesare
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 4.757

Review 2.  Dislocation after total hip arthroplasty: implant design and orientation.

Authors:  Robert L Barrack
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg       Date:  2003 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.020

3.  Reduced variability of acetabular cup positioning with use of an imageless navigation system.

Authors:  Michael Nogler; Oliver Kessler; Alexandra Prassl; Bill Donnelly; Robert Streicher; John B Sledge; Martin Krismer
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Evaluation of cementless acetabular component migration. An experimental study.

Authors:  P Massin; L Schmidt; C A Engh
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 4.757

5.  Dislocations after total hip-replacement arthroplasties.

Authors:  G E Lewinnek; J L Lewis; R Tarr; C L Compere; J R Zimmerman
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1978-03       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  The precision and usefulness of preoperative planning for cemented and hybrid primary total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Alejandro González Della Valle; Gastón Slullitel; Francisco Piccaluga; Eduardo A Salvati
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 4.757

7.  Effect of acetabular component orientation on recurrent dislocation, pelvic osteolysis, polyethylene wear, and component migration.

Authors:  J G Kennedy; W B Rogers; K E Soffe; R J Sullivan; D G Griffen; L J Sheehan
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 4.757

8.  Computer assisted measurement of cup placement in total hip replacement.

Authors:  B Jaramaz; A M DiGioia; M Blackwell; C Nikou
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  The outcome of Charnley total hip arthroplasty with cement after a minimum twenty-year follow-up. The results of one surgeon.

Authors:  K R Schulte; J J Callaghan; S S Kelley; R C Johnston
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  The effect of abduction differences between cup and contralateral acetabular angle on polyethylene component wear.

Authors:  M Kligman; H Michael; M Roffman
Journal:  Orthopedics       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 1.390

View more
  5 in total

1.  Measuring acetabular component version after THA: CT or plain radiograph?

Authors:  Benjamin McArthur; Michael Cross; Christina Geatrakas; David Mayman; Bernard Ghelman
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-03-01       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Using acetabular fossa as a guide for anticipated inclination of uncemented cup in total hip replacement.

Authors:  Junwei Li; Xu Gao; Guanghui Yang; Yanru Zhang
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-01-15

3.  Personalized image-based templates for precise acetabular prosthesis placement in total hip arthroplasty: a pilot study.

Authors:  Bin Chen; Sheng-xiang Xiao; Peng-cheng Gu; Xiang-jin Lin
Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci B       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 3.066

4.  Validation of use of transverse acetabular ligament and mechanical angle guide device to orient the acetabular cup.

Authors:  Archit Agarwal; Inder Pawar; Sandeep Singh; Deepti Randev; Hem Chandra Sati
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2020-08-06

5.  Improving Acetabular Component Positioning in Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Cadaveric Study of an Inertial Navigation Tool and a Novel Registration Method.

Authors:  Jobe Shatrov; Daniel Marsden-Jones; Matt Lyons; William L Walter
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2021-11-02
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.