Literature DB >> 12670135

Dislocation after total hip arthroplasty: implant design and orientation.

Robert L Barrack1.   

Abstract

Implant design and positioning are important factors in maintaining stability and minimizing dislocation after total hip arthroplasty. Although the advent of modular femoral stems and acetabular implants increased the number of head, neck, and liner designs, the features of recent designs can cause intra-articular prosthetic impingement within the arc of motion required for normal daily activities and thus lead to limited motion, increased wear, osteolysis, and subluxation or dislocation. Minimizing impingement involves avoiding skirted heads, matching a 22-mm head with an appropriate acetabular implant, maximizing the head-to-neck ratio, and, when possible, using a chamfered acetabular liner and a trapezoidal, rather than circular, neck cross-section. Computer modeling studies indicate the optimal cup position is 45 degrees to 55 degrees abduction. Angles <55 degrees require anteversion of 10 degrees to 20 degrees of both the stem and cup to minimize the risk of impingement and dislocation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12670135     DOI: 10.5435/00124635-200303000-00003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg        ISSN: 1067-151X            Impact factor:   3.020


  56 in total

1.  Wear analysis of chamfered elongated acetabular cup liners.

Authors:  Hsiao-Che Lin; Tzuo-Liang Luo; Jian-Horng Chen
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2011-12-22       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Anteroposterior Radiographs Are More Accurate than Cross-Table Lateral Radiographs for Acetabular Anteversion Assessment: a Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Peter K Sculco; Alexander S McLawhorn; Kaitlin M Carroll; Benjamin A McArthur; David J Mayman
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2015-10-19

3.  [Comparison of total hip replacements cup orientation and position. Navigation vs. conventional manual implantation of hip prostheses].

Authors:  M Honl; K Schwieger; C H Gauck; F Lampe; M M Morlock; M A Wimmer; E Hille
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 1.087

4.  Short-term wear evaluation of thin acetabular liners on 36-mm femoral heads.

Authors:  Aaron J Johnson; LaQuawn Loving; Lizeth Herrera; Ronald E Delanois; Aiguo Wang; Michael A Mont
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  The relationship of pelvic incidence to post-operative total hip arthroplasty dislocation in patients with lumbar fusion.

Authors:  Philip J York; Alan W McGee; Chase S Dean; Justin E Hellwinkel; Christopher J Kleck; Michael R Dayton; Craig A Hogan
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-04-28       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 6.  Acetabular orientation: anterolateral approach in the supine position.

Authors:  Matthew S Austin; Richard H Rothman
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-10-01       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Effectiveness of an acetabular positioning device in primary total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Douglas E Padgett; Stephen L Hendrix; Timothy S Mologne; Drew A Peterson; Keith A Holley
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2005-09

Review 8.  [The standard implantation of a total hip prosthesis via two incisions (the Yale Technique)].

Authors:  Robert Kipping
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 1.154

9.  Does computer-assisted surgery benefit leg length restoration in total hip replacement? Navigation versus conventional freehand.

Authors:  Alfonso Manzotti; Pietro Cerveri; Elena De Momi; Chris Pullen; Norberto Confalonieri
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2009-11-11       Impact factor: 3.075

10.  Morbid obesity may increase dislocation in total hip patients: a biomechanical analysis.

Authors:  Jacob M Elkins; Matej Daniel; Douglas R Pedersen; Bhupinder Singh; H John Yack; John J Callaghan; Thomas D Brown
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-08-21       Impact factor: 4.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.