Literature DB >> 18709500

Response requirements modulate tactile spatial congruency effects.

Alberto Gallace1, Salvador Soto-Faraco, Polly Dalton, Bas Kreukniet, Charles Spence.   

Abstract

Several recent studies have provided support for the view that tactile stimuli/events are remapped into an abstract spatial frame of reference beyond the initial somatotopic representation present in the primary somatosensory cortex. Here, we demonstrate for the first time that the extent to which this remapping of tactile stimuli takes place is dependent upon the particular demands imposed by the task that participants have to perform. Participants in the present study responded to either the elevation (up vs. down) or to the anatomical location (finger vs. thumb) of vibrotactile targets presented to one hand, while trying to ignore distractors presented simultaneously to the other hand. The magnitude and direction of the target-distractor congruency effect was measured as participants adopted one of two different postures with each hand (palm-up or palm-down). When the participants used footpedal responses (toe vs. heel; Experiment 1), congruency effects were determined by the relative elevation of the stimuli in external coordinates (same vs. different elevation), regardless of whether the relevant response feature was defined externally or anatomically. Even when participants responded verbally (Experiment 2), the influence of the relative elevation of the stimuli in external space, albeit attenuated, was still observed. However, when the task involved responding with the stimulated finger (four-alternative forced choice; Experiment 3), congruency effects were virtually eliminated. These findings support the view that tactile events can be remapped according to an abstract frame of reference resulting from multisensory integration, but that the frame of reference that is used while performing a particular task may depend to a large extent on the nature of the task demands.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18709500     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-008-1510-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  65 in total

1.  Where conscious sensation takes place.

Authors:  Shigeru Kitazawa
Journal:  Conscious Cogn       Date:  2002-09

Review 2.  A computational perspective on the neural basis of multisensory spatial representations.

Authors:  Alexandre Pouget; Sophie Deneve; Jean-René Duhamel
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 34.870

3.  Back-to-front: improved tactile discrimination performance in the space you cannot see.

Authors:  István Kóbor; László Füredi; Gyula Kovács; Charles Spence; Zoltán Vidnyánszky
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2006-03-03       Impact factor: 3.046

4.  The representation of visual salience in monkey parietal cortex.

Authors:  J P Gottlieb; M Kusunoki; M E Goldberg
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1998-01-29       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 5.  Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention.

Authors:  R Desimone; J Duncan
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 12.449

6.  Visual capture of touch: out-of-the-body experiences with rubber gloves.

Authors:  F Pavani; C Spence; J Driver
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2000-09

7.  Neuromagnetic somatosensory homunculus: a non-invasive approach in humans.

Authors:  L Narici; I Modena; R J Opsomer; V Pizzella; G L Romani; G Torrioli; R Traversa; P M Rossini
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  1991-01-02       Impact factor: 3.046

8.  Effect of posture change on tactile perception: impaired direction discrimination performance with interleaved fingers.

Authors:  Massimiliano Zampini; Charlotte Harris; Charles Spence
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-07-21       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Visual bias of unseen hand position with a mirror: spatial and temporal factors.

Authors:  Nicholas P Holmes; Charles Spence
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-07-20       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Perceived spatial organization of cutaneous patterns on surfaces of the human body in various positions.

Authors:  L M Parsons; S Shimojo
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1987-08       Impact factor: 3.332

View more
  13 in total

1.  Crossing the hands is more confusing for females than males.

Authors:  Michelle L Cadieux; Michael Barnett-Cowan; David I Shore
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-06-24       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Spatial attention affects the processing of tactile and visual stimuli presented at the tip of a tool: an event-related potential study.

Authors:  Zhenzhu Yue; Gérard-Nisal Bischof; Xiaolin Zhou; Charles Spence; Brigitte Röder
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-10-21       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Vision of embodied rubber hands enhances tactile distractor processing.

Authors:  Ann-Katrin Wesslein; Charles Spence; Christian Frings
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-10-30       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Sustained maintenance of somatotopic information in brain regions recruited by tactile working memory.

Authors:  Tobias Katus; Matthias M Müller; Martin Eimer
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-01-28       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Influence of the body on crossmodal interference effects between tactile and two-dimensional visual stimuli.

Authors:  Yuka Igarashi; Norimichi Kitagawa; Shigeru Ichihara
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-06-25       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Peripersonal space around the upper and the lower limbs.

Authors:  Elena Gherri; Aolong Xu; Elisabetta Ambron; Anna Sedda
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2022-06-21       Impact factor: 2.064

7.  The crossmodal congruency task as a means to obtain an objective behavioral measure in the rubber hand illusion paradigm.

Authors:  Regine Zopf; Greg Savage; Mark A Williams
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2013-07-26       Impact factor: 1.355

8.  Fingers crossed! An investigation of somatotopic representations using spatial directional judgements.

Authors:  Alyanne M de Haan; Helen A Anema; H Chris Dijkerman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-09-24       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Vision affects tactile target and distractor processing even when space is task-irrelevant.

Authors:  Ann-Katrin Wesslein; Charles Spence; Christian Frings
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-02-06

10.  Know thyself: behavioral evidence for a structural representation of the human body.

Authors:  Elena Rusconi; Mirandola Gonzaga; Michela Adriani; Christoph Braun; Patrick Haggard
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-05-01       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.