Literature DB >> 23912051

The crossmodal congruency task as a means to obtain an objective behavioral measure in the rubber hand illusion paradigm.

Regine Zopf1, Greg Savage, Mark A Williams.   

Abstract

The rubber hand illusion (RHI) is a popular experimental paradigm. Participants view touch on an artificial rubber hand while the participants' own hidden hand is touched. If the viewed and felt touches are given at the same time then this is sufficient to induce the compelling experience that the rubber hand is one's own hand. The RHI can be used to investigate exactly how the brain constructs distinct body representations for one's own body. Such representations are crucial for successful interactions with the external world. To obtain a subjective measure of the RHI, researchers typically ask participants to rate statements such as "I felt as if the rubber hand were my hand". Here we demonstrate how the crossmodal congruency task can be used to obtain an objective behavioral measure within this paradigm. The variant of the crossmodal congruency task we employ involves the presentation of tactile targets and visual distractors. Targets and distractors are spatially congruent (i.e. same finger) on some trials and incongruent (i.e. different finger) on others. The difference in performance between incongruent and congruent trials - the crossmodal congruency effect (CCE) - indexes multisensory interactions. Importantly, the CCE is modulated both by viewing a hand as well as the synchrony of viewed and felt touch which are both crucial factors for the RHI. The use of the crossmodal congruency task within the RHI paradigm has several advantages. It is a simple behavioral measure which can be repeated many times and which can be obtained during the illusion while participants view the artificial hand. Furthermore, this measure is not susceptible to observer and experimenter biases. The combination of the RHI paradigm with the crossmodal congruency task allows in particular for the investigation of multisensory processes which are critical for modulations of body representations as in the RHI.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23912051      PMCID: PMC3846377          DOI: 10.3791/50530

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis Exp        ISSN: 1940-087X            Impact factor:   1.355


  27 in total

1.  The experimental induction of out-of-body experiences.

Authors:  H Henrik Ehrsson
Journal:  Science       Date:  2007-08-24       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 2.  Bodily illusions in health and disease: physiological and clinical perspectives and the concept of a cortical 'body matrix'.

Authors:  G Lorimer Moseley; Alberto Gallace; Charles Spence
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2011-04-06       Impact factor: 8.989

3.  Rubber hands 'feel' touch that eyes see.

Authors:  M Botvinick; J Cohen
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1998-02-19       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 4.  Multisensory brain mechanisms of bodily self-consciousness.

Authors:  Olaf Blanke
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2012-07-18       Impact factor: 34.870

5.  Visual capture of touch: out-of-the-body experiences with rubber gloves.

Authors:  F Pavani; C Spence; J Driver
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2000-09

6.  Viewing and feeling touch modulates hand position for reaching.

Authors:  Regine Zopf; Sandra Truong; Matthew Finkbeiner; Jason Friedman; Mark A Williams
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2011-02-12       Impact factor: 3.139

7.  Response requirements modulate tactile spatial congruency effects.

Authors:  Alberto Gallace; Salvador Soto-Faraco; Polly Dalton; Bas Kreukniet; Charles Spence
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-08-16       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Crossmodal congruency measures of lateral distance effects on the rubber hand illusion.

Authors:  Regine Zopf; Greg Savage; Mark A Williams
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2009-11-11       Impact factor: 3.139

9.  The Rubber Hand Illusion: feeling of ownership and proprioceptive drift do not go hand in hand.

Authors:  Marieke Rohde; Massimiliano Di Luca; Marc O Ernst
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-06-28       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  If I were you: perceptual illusion of body swapping.

Authors:  Valeria I Petkova; H Henrik Ehrsson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-12-03       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  6 in total

1.  Agency elicits body-ownership: proprioceptive drift toward a synchronously acting external proxy.

Authors:  Tomohisa Asai
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-02-26       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  The contribution of response conflict, multisensory integration, and body-mediated attention to the crossmodal congruency effect.

Authors:  Francesco Marini; Daniele Romano; Angelo Maravita
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-12-02       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Assessing the quality of supplementary sensory feedback using the crossmodal congruency task.

Authors:  Daniel Blustein; Adam Wilson; Jon Sensinger
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-04-18       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Crossmodal congruency effect scores decrease with repeat test exposure.

Authors:  Daniel Blustein; Satinder Gill; Adam Wilson; Jon Sensinger
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2019-05-22       Impact factor: 2.984

5.  Spinal cord lesions shrink peripersonal space around the feet, passive mobilization of paraplegic limbs restores it.

Authors:  Michele Scandola; Salvatore Maria Aglioti; Claudio Bonente; Renato Avesani; Valentina Moro
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-04-06       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Non-hierarchical Influence of Visual Form, Touch, and Position Cues on Embodiment, Agency, and Presence in Virtual Reality.

Authors:  Stephen C Pritchard; Regine Zopf; Vince Polito; David M Kaplan; Mark A Williams
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-10-25
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.