Literature DB >> 2958596

Perceived spatial organization of cutaneous patterns on surfaces of the human body in various positions.

L M Parsons1, S Shimojo.   

Abstract

The perceived spatial organization of cutaneous patterns was examined in three experiments. People identified letters or numbers traced on surfaces of their body when the relative spatial orientations and positions of the body surfaces and of the stimuli were varied. Stimuli on the front or back of the head were perceived with respect to a frame of reference positioned behind those surfaces, independent of the surfaces' position and orientation. This independence may relate to the way in which the sensory apparatus on the front of the head is used in planning action. Stimuli on other surfaces of the head and body were perceived in relation to the position and orientation of the surface with respect to the whole body or trunk (most of which was usually upright). Stimuli on all transverse/horizontal surfaces were perceived with respect to frames of reference associated with the head/upper chest area. These frames were also used for stimuli on frontoparallel surfaces in front of the upper body. These observations may result from the use of "central" frames of reference that are independent of the head and are associated with the upper body. Stimuli on surfaces in other positions and orientations (with two exceptions) were perceived "externally"--that is, in frames of reference directly facing the stimulated surface. The spatial information processing we found may be fairly general because several of our main findings were also observed in very young children and blind adults and in paradigms studying perception by "active touch" and the spatial organization of the motor production of patterns.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 2958596     DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.13.3.488

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  13 in total

1.  Importance of head axes in perception of cutaneous patterns drawn on vertical body surfaces.

Authors:  K Sekiyama
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1991-05

2.  Bodies and their parts.

Authors:  Julie Bauer Morrison; Barbara Tversky
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2005-06

3.  Vibrotactile masking through the body.

Authors:  Sarah D'Amour; Laurence R Harris
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-05-06       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Mental visualization of objects from cross-sectional images.

Authors:  Bing Wu; Roberta L Klatzky; George D Stetten
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2012-01-02

5.  Mirror reversal by blind subjects in cutaneous perception and motor production of letters and numbers.

Authors:  S Shimojo; M Sasaki; L M Parsons; S Torii
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1989-02

6.  Egocentric references and human spatial orientation in microgravity. I. Perception of complex tactile stimuli.

Authors:  V S Gurfinkel; F Lestienne; K E Popov
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  The effect of spatial orientation on the perception of moving tactile stimuli.

Authors:  M A Rinker; J C Craig
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1994-09

8.  Multimodal Interactions between Proprioceptive and Cutaneous Signals in Primary Somatosensory Cortex.

Authors:  Sung Soo Kim; Manuel Gomez-Ramirez; Pramodsingh H Thakur; Steven S Hsiao
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2015-04-09       Impact factor: 17.173

9.  Cognition overrides orientation dependence in tactile viewpoint selection.

Authors:  Jessica Hartcher-O'Brien; Malika Auvray
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-02-19       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Response requirements modulate tactile spatial congruency effects.

Authors:  Alberto Gallace; Salvador Soto-Faraco; Polly Dalton; Bas Kreukniet; Charles Spence
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-08-16       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.