Literature DB >> 35727366

Peripersonal space around the upper and the lower limbs.

Elena Gherri1,2, Aolong Xu3, Elisabetta Ambron4, Anna Sedda5.   

Abstract

Peripersonal space (PPS), the space closely surrounding the body, is typically characterised by enhanced multisensory integration. Neurophysiological and behavioural studies have consistently shown stronger visuo-tactile integration when a visual stimulus is presented close to the tactually stimulate body part in near space (within PPS) than in far space. However, in the majority of these studies, tactile stimuli were delivered to the upper limbs, torso and face. Therefore, it is not known whether the space surrounding the lower limbs is characterised by similar multisensory properties. To address this question, we asked participants to complete two versions of the classic visuo-tactile crossmodal congruency task in which they had to perform speeded elevation judgements of tactile stimuli presented to the dorsum of the hand and foot while a simultaneous visual distractor was presented at spatially congruent or incongruent locations either in near or far space. In line with existing evidence, when the tactile target was presented to the hand, the size of the crossmodal congruency effect (CCE) decreased in far as compared to near space, suggesting stronger visuo-tactile multisensory integration within PPS. In contrast, when the tactile target was presented to the foot, the CCE decreased for visual distractors in near than far space. These findings show systematic differences between the representation of PPS around upper and lower limbs, suggesting that the multisensory properties of the different body part-centred representations of PPS are likely to depend on the potential actions performed by the different body parts.
© 2022. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Crossmodal congruency task; Foot representation; Hand representation; Multisensory integration; Peripersonal space

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35727366      PMCID: PMC9288357          DOI: 10.1007/s00221-022-06387-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   2.064


  39 in total

1.  Neuropsychological evidence of modular organization of the near peripersonal space.

Authors:  Alessandro Farnè; Maria Luisa Demattè; Elisabetta Làdavas
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2005-12-13       Impact factor: 9.910

2.  Grasping actions remap peripersonal space.

Authors:  Claudio Brozzoli; Francesco Pavani; Christian Urquizar; Lucilla Cardinali; Alessandro Farnè
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2009-07-01       Impact factor: 1.837

3.  Where exactly am I? Self-location judgements distribute between head and torso.

Authors:  Adrian J T Alsmith; Matthew R Longo
Journal:  Conscious Cogn       Date:  2014-01-21

4.  Footedness is a better predictor than is handedness of emotional lateralization.

Authors:  L J Elias; M P Bryden; M B Bulman-Fleming
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 3.139

Review 5.  Neuronal bases of peripersonal and extrapersonal spaces, their plasticity and their dynamics: knowns and unknowns.

Authors:  Justine Cléry; Olivier Guipponi; Claire Wardak; Suliann Ben Hamed
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2014-10-24       Impact factor: 3.139

6.  Remapping Peripersonal Space by Using Foot-Sole Vibrations Without Any Body Movement.

Authors:  Tomohiro Amemiya; Yasushi Ikei; Michiteru Kitazaki
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2019-09-23

7.  Thermosensory micromapping of warm and cold sensitivity across glabrous and hairy skin of male and female hands and feet.

Authors:  Davide Filingeri; Hui Zhang; Edward A Arens
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2018-06-07

Review 8.  Peripersonal space in the brain.

Authors:  Giuseppe di Pellegrino; Elisabetta Làdavas
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2014-11-13       Impact factor: 3.139

9.  Action-specific remapping of peripersonal space.

Authors:  C Brozzoli; L Cardinali; F Pavani; A Farnè
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2009-10-27       Impact factor: 3.139

10.  Response requirements modulate tactile spatial congruency effects.

Authors:  Alberto Gallace; Salvador Soto-Faraco; Polly Dalton; Bas Kreukniet; Charles Spence
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-08-16       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.