Literature DB >> 16032401

Visual bias of unseen hand position with a mirror: spatial and temporal factors.

Nicholas P Holmes1, Charles Spence.   

Abstract

Two experiments examined the integration of visual and proprioceptive information concerning the location of an unseen hand, using a mirror positioned along the midsagittal plane. In experiment 1, participants tapped the fingers of both hands in synchrony, while viewing the mirror-reflection of their left hand. After 6 s, participants made reaching movements to a target with their unseen right hand behind the mirror. Reaches were accurate when visually and proprioceptively specified hand positions were congruent prior to the reach, but significantly biased by vision when the visual location conflicted with the real location. This effect was independent of the target location and depended strongly upon the relative position of the mirror-reflected hand. In experiment 2, participants made reaching movements following 4, 8, or 12 s active visuomotor or passive visual exposure to the mirror, or following passive exposure without the mirror. Reaching was biased more by the visual location following active visuomotor compared to passive visual exposure, and this bias increased with the duration of visual exposure. These results suggest that the felt position of the hand depends upon an integrated, weighted sum of visual and proprioceptive information. Visual information is weighted more strongly under active visuomotor than passive visual exposure, and with increasing exposure duration to the mirror reflected hand.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16032401      PMCID: PMC1343466          DOI: 10.1007/s00221-005-2389-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  41 in total

1.  A systematic directional error in 2-D arm movements increases with increasing delay between visual target presentation and movement execution.

Authors:  N Smyrnis; P Gourtzelidis; I Evdokimidis
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Allocation of attention and the locus of adaptation to displaced vision.

Authors:  J A Kelso; E Cook; M E Olson; W Epstein
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1975-08       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Active versus passive proprioceptive straight-ahead pointing in normal subjects.

Authors:  Sylvie Chokron; Pascale Colliot; Thierry Atzeni; Paolo Bartolomeo; Théophile Ohlmann
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 2.310

Review 4.  Merging the senses into a robust percept.

Authors:  Marc O Ernst; Heinrich H Bülthoff
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 20.229

5.  The precision of proprioceptive position sense.

Authors:  R J van Beers; A C Sittig; J J Denier van der Gon
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Synaesthesia in the normal limb.

Authors:  M Mon-Williams; J P Wann; M Jenkinson; K Rushton
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  1997-07-22       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  An examination of the relationship between visual capture and prism adaptation.

Authors:  R B Welch; M H Widawski; J Harrington; D H Warren
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1979-02

8.  Representation of hand position prior to movement and motor variability.

Authors:  M Desmurget; Y Rossetti; C Prablanc; G E Stelmach; M Jeannerod
Journal:  Can J Physiol Pharmacol       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 2.273

9.  Doing it with mirrors: a case study of a novel approach to neurorehabilitation.

Authors:  K Sathian; A I Greenspan; S L Wolf
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 3.919

10.  When mirrors lie: "visual capture" of arm position impairs reaching performance.

Authors:  Nicholas P Holmes; Gemma Crozier; Charles Spence
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.282

View more
  40 in total

1.  The illusion of changed position and movement from vibrating one arm is altered by vision or movement of the other arm.

Authors:  Masahiko Izumizaki; Mikio Tsuge; Lena Akai; Uwe Proske; Ikuo Homma
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2010-06-14       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Crossing the hands is more confusing for females than males.

Authors:  Michelle L Cadieux; Michael Barnett-Cowan; David I Shore
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-06-24       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 3.  The mirror illusion's effects on body state estimation.

Authors:  Tamer M Soliman; Laurel J Buxbaum; Steven A Jax
Journal:  Cogn Neuropsychol       Date:  2016-07-07       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  The effect of target modality on visual and proprioceptive contributions to the control of movement distance.

Authors:  Fabrice R Sarlegna; Robert L Sainburg
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Visual capture influences body-based indications of visual extent.

Authors:  Benjamin R Kunz; Sarah H Creem-Regehr; William B Thompson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-10-27       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Alleviating the 'crossed-hands' deficit by seeing uncrossed rubber hands.

Authors:  Elena Azañón; Salvador Soto-Faraco
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-07-21       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Effect of a mirror-like illusion on activation in the precuneus assessed with functional near-infrared spectroscopy.

Authors:  Jan Mehnert; Maddalena Brunetti; Jens Steinbrink; Michael Niedeggen; Christian Dohle
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 3.170

8.  Visual illusion of tool use recalibrates tactile perception.

Authors:  Luke E Miller; Matthew R Longo; Ayse P Saygin
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2017-02-11

9.  Kinaesthetic mirror illusion and spatial congruence.

Authors:  Morgane Metral; Marie Chancel; Clémentine Brun; Marion Luyat; Anne Kavounoudias; Michel Guerraz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-02-11       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  How many motoric body representations can we grasp?

Authors:  Marjolein P M Kammers; Joyce A Kootker; Hinze Hogendoorn; H Chris Dijkerman
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-12-29       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.