Literature DB >> 16516383

Back-to-front: improved tactile discrimination performance in the space you cannot see.

István Kóbor1, László Füredi, Gyula Kovács, Charles Spence, Zoltán Vidnyánszky.   

Abstract

We investigated any differences in people's ability to reconstruct the appropriate spatiotemporal ordering of multiple tactile stimuli, when presented in frontal space (a region where visual inputs tend to dominate) versus in the space behind the back (a region of space that we rarely see) in professional piano players and in non-musicians. Even though tactile temporal order judgments were much better in the musicians overall, both groups showed a much reduced crossed-hands deficit when their hands were crossed behind their backs rather than at the front. These results suggest that because of differences in the availability of visual input, the spatiotemporal representation of non-visual stimuli in front versus rear space is different.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16516383     DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2006.02.037

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosci Lett        ISSN: 0304-3940            Impact factor:   3.046


  23 in total

1.  Measuring the sensitivity of tactile temporal order judgments in sighted and blind participants using the adaptive psi method.

Authors:  Camille Vanderclausen; Lieve Filbrich; Anne De Volder; Valéry Legrain
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-05-25       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Hands behind your back: effects of arm posture on tactile attention in the space behind the body.

Authors:  Helge Gillmeister; Bettina Forster
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-11-20       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Crossing the hands is more confusing for females than males.

Authors:  Michelle L Cadieux; Michael Barnett-Cowan; David I Shore
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-06-24       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Integration of anatomical and external response mappings explains crossing effects in tactile localization: A probabilistic modeling approach.

Authors:  Stephanie Badde; Tobias Heed; Brigitte Röder
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-04

5.  Spatial remapping of touch: confusion of perceived stimulus order across hand and foot.

Authors:  Tobias Schicke; Brigitte Röder
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-07-24       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Alleviating the 'crossed-hands' deficit by seeing uncrossed rubber hands.

Authors:  Elena Azañón; Salvador Soto-Faraco
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-07-21       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 7.  From maps to form to space: touch and the body schema.

Authors:  Jared Medina; H Branch Coslett
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2009-08-20       Impact factor: 3.139

8.  Response requirements modulate tactile spatial congruency effects.

Authors:  Alberto Gallace; Salvador Soto-Faraco; Polly Dalton; Bas Kreukniet; Charles Spence
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-08-16       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Relative contributions of visual and auditory spatial representations to tactile localization.

Authors:  Jean-Paul Noel; Mark Wallace
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2016-01-06       Impact factor: 3.139

Review 10.  The development of body representations: an associative learning account.

Authors:  Carina C J M de Klerk; Maria Laura Filippetti; Silvia Rigato
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-04-28       Impact factor: 5.349

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.