Literature DB >> 25354970

Vision of embodied rubber hands enhances tactile distractor processing.

Ann-Katrin Wesslein1, Charles Spence, Christian Frings.   

Abstract

Previous research has demonstrated that viewing one's hand can induce tactile response compatibility effects at the hands. Here, we investigated the question of whether vision of one's own hand is actually necessary. The Eriksen flanker task was combined with the rubber hand illusion in order to determine whether tactile distractors presented to the hand would be processed up to the level of response selection when a pair of rubber hands was seen (while one's own hands were not). Our results demonstrate that only if the rubber hands are perceived as belonging to one's own body, is enhanced distractor processing (up to the level of response selection) observed at the hands. In conclusion, vision of a pair of fake hands enhances tactile distractor processing at the hands if, and only if, it happens to be incorporated into the body representation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25354970     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-014-4129-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  41 in total

1.  Vision influences tactile perception at body sites that cannot be viewed directly.

Authors:  S P Tipper; N Phillips; C Dancer; D Lloyd; L A Howard; F McGlone
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 2.  Merging the senses into a robust percept.

Authors:  Marc O Ernst; Heinrich H Bülthoff
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 20.229

3.  Assessing the influence of schematic drawings of body parts on tactile discrimination performance using the crossmodal congruency task.

Authors:  Yuka Igarashi; Norimichi Kitagawa; Charles Spence; Shigeru Ichihara
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2006-06-08

4.  Tactile selective attention and temporal masking.

Authors:  J C Craig; P M Evans
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1995-05

5.  Vibrotactile masking: the role of response competition.

Authors:  J C Craig
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1995-11

6.  Visual capture of touch: out-of-the-body experiences with rubber gloves.

Authors:  F Pavani; C Spence; J Driver
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2000-09

7.  When seeing doesn't matter: assessing the after-effects of tactile distractor processing in the blind and the sighted.

Authors:  Christian Frings; Anna Amendt; Charles Spence
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Visual processing and the bodily self.

Authors:  Louise Whiteley; Charles Spence; Patrick Haggard
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2007-05-11

9.  The Rubber Hand Illusion: feeling of ownership and proprioceptive drift do not go hand in hand.

Authors:  Marieke Rohde; Massimiliano Di Luca; Marc O Ernst
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-06-28       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Rapid enhancement of touch from non-informative vision of the hand.

Authors:  Flavia Cardini; Matthew R Longo; Jon Driver; Patrick Haggard
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2012-05-02       Impact factor: 3.139

View more
  2 in total

1.  Different effects of spatial separation in action and perception.

Authors:  Sarah Schäfer; Christian Frings
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2021-01-26

2.  When irrelevant information helps: Extending the Eriksen-flanker task into a multisensory world.

Authors:  Simon Merz; Christian Frings; Charles Spence
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-02       Impact factor: 2.199

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.