Literature DB >> 18685847

Validation of a simple radiographic method to determine variations in pelvic and acetabular cup sagittal plane alignment after total hip arthroplasty.

Won Yong Shon1, Siddhartha Gupta, Sandeep Biswal, Chang Yong Hur, Nirmal Jajodia, Suk Joo Hong, Jae Sung Myung.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Orientation of acetabular component, influenced by pelvic tilt, body position, and individual variations affects the outcome following total hip arthroplasty (THA). Currently available methods of evaluation are either imprecise or require advanced image processing. We analyzed intersubject and intrasubject variability of pelvic tilt, measured by sagittal sacral tilt (ST) and its relationship with acetabular component tilt (AT) by using a simple method based on standard radiographs.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: ST was measured on lateral radiographs of pelvis including lumbosacral spine obtained in supine, sitting, standing, and lateral decubitus position for 40 asymptomatic THA patients and compared to computed tomography (CT) data obtained in supine position. AT was measured on lateral radiographs (measured acetabular tilt: MAT) in each position and compared to measurement of AT on CT and an indirectly calculated AT (CAT).
RESULTS: Mean ST changed from supine to sitting, standing, and lateral decubitus positions as follows: 26.5 +/- 15.5 degrees (range 4.6-73.4 degrees ), 8.4 +/- 6.2 degrees (range 0.6-24.5 degrees ), and 13.4 +/- 8.4 degrees (range 0.1-24.2 degrees ; p < 0.0001, p = 0.002, p = 0.006). The MAT on radiographs was not significantly different from the MAT measured on CT (p = 0.002) and the CAT (p = 0.06). There is a good correlation between change in ST and MAT in sagittal plane (r = 0.93).
CONCLUSION: Measurement of ST on radiographs is a simple and reliable method to track changes in pelvic tilt in different body positions. There is significant intersubject and intrasubject variation of ST and MAT with postural changes and it may explain causes of impingement or instability following THA, which could not be previously explained.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18685847     DOI: 10.1007/s00256-008-0550-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Skeletal Radiol        ISSN: 0364-2348            Impact factor:   2.199


  32 in total

1.  The spatial location of impingement in total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  M Yamaguchi; T Akisue; T W Bauer; Y Hashimoto
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 4.757

2.  The effect of acetabular cup orientations on limiting hip rotation.

Authors:  F J Kummer; S Shah; S Iyer; P E DiCesare
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 4.757

3.  Hip-spine relationship: a radio-anatomical study for optimization in acetabular cup positioning.

Authors:  J-Y Lazennec; N Charlot; M Gorin; B Roger; N Arafati; A Bissery; G Saillant
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2003-11-07       Impact factor: 1.246

4.  Pelvic tilt makes acetabular cup navigation inaccurate.

Authors:  Burkhard Lembeck; Otto Mueller; Patrik Reize; Nikolaus Wuelker
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 3.717

5.  Development of imageless computer navigation for acetabular component position in total hip replacement.

Authors:  Lawrence D Dorr; Yuji Hishiki; Zhinian Wan; Deanne Newton; Andrew Yun
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2005

6.  Prevalence of impingement in explanted Charnley acetabular components.

Authors:  R M Hall; P Siney; A Unsworth; B M Wroblewski
Journal:  J Orthop Sci       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 1.601

7.  Anatomic referencing of cup orientation in total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Moritz Tannast; Ulrich Langlotz; Klaus-Arno Siebenrock; Matthias Wiese; Kai Bernsmann; Frank Langlotz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Statistical methodology for the concurrent assessment of interrater and intrarater reliability: using goniometric measurements as an example.

Authors:  M Eliasziw; S L Young; M G Woodbury; K Fryday-Field
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  1994-08

9.  A technique for measuring pelvic tilt.

Authors:  G Sanders; P Stavrakas
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  1981-01

10.  Polyethylene wear and acetabular component orientation.

Authors:  Shantanu Patil; Arnie Bergula; Peter C Chen; Clifford W Colwell; Darryl D D'Lima
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 5.284

View more
  6 in total

1.  Accuracy and reliability of different methods to evaluate the acetabular cup version from plain radiographs.

Authors:  Maximilian Haenle; Wolfram Mittelmeier; Rodrigo Barbano; Klaus Wörtler; Roger Scholz; Rainer Bader
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2010-06-25       Impact factor: 1.246

Review 2.  Radiographic assessment of the cup orientation after total hip arthroplasty: a literature review.

Authors:  Jing-Xin Zhao; Xiu-Yun Su; Zhe Zhao; Ruo-Xiu Xiao; Li-Cheng Zhang; Pei-Fu Tang
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2020-02

3.  The John Charnley Award: risk factors for cup malpositioning: quality improvement through a joint registry at a tertiary hospital.

Authors:  Mark C Callanan; Bryan Jarrett; Charles R Bragdon; David Zurakowski; Harry E Rubash; Andrew A Freiberg; Henrik Malchau
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Importance of the spinopelvic factors on the pelvic inclination from standing to sitting before total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Hironori Ochi; Tomonori Baba; Yasuhiro Homma; Mikio Matsumoto; Hidetoshi Nojiri; Kazuo Kaneko
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Can pelvic tilting be ignored in total hip arthroplasty?

Authors:  Won Yong Shon; Vivek Sharma; Oh Jong Keon; Jun Gyu Moon; Dong Hun Suh
Journal:  Int J Surg Case Rep       Date:  2014-07-24

6.  Calculation of the 3-D femoral component's orientation in total hip arthroplasty using a trigonometric algorithm.

Authors:  Joost H J van Erp; Tom P C Schlösser; Ariënne W Baijense; Thom E Snijders; Rob Stevenson; Willem Paul Gielis; René M Castelein; Harrie Weinans; Arthur de Gast
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-03-03       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.