Literature DB >> 12083215

Efficient adaptive procedures for threshold and concurrent slope estimates for psychophysics and speech intelligibility tests.

Thomas Brand1, Birger Kollmeier.   

Abstract

The minimum standard deviations achievable for concurrent estimates of thresholds and psychometric function slopes as well as the optimal target values for adaptive procedures are calculated as functions of stimulus level and track length on the basis of the binomial theory. The optimum pair of targets for a concurrent estimate is found at the correct response probabilities p1 = 0.19 and p2 = 0.81 for the logistic psychometric function. An adaptive procedure that converges at these optimal targets is introduced and tested with Monte Carlo simulations. The efficiency increases rapidly when each subject's response consists of more than one statistically independent Bernoulli trial. Sentence intelligibility tests provide more than one Bernoulli trial per sentence when each word is scored separately. The number of within-sentence trials can be quantified by the j factor [Boothroyd and Nittrouer, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 84, 101-114 (1988)]. The adaptive procedure was evaluated with 10 normal-hearing and 11 hearing-impaired listeners using two German sentence tests that differ in j factors. The expected advantage of the sentence test with the higher j factor was not observed, possibly due to training effects. Hence, the number of sentences required for a reliable speech reception threshold (approximately 1 dB standard deviation) concurrently with a slope estimate (approximately 20%-30% relative standard deviation) is at least N = 30 if word scoring for short, meaningful sentences (j approximately 2) is performed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12083215     DOI: 10.1121/1.1479152

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  83 in total

1.  [Comparison of the Göttingen sentence test and the monosyllabic rhyme test by von Wallenberg and Kollmeier with the Freiburg speech test : Investigation in a clinically representative group of listeners].

Authors:  H Sukowski; T Brand; K C Wagener; B Kollmeier
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 1.284

2.  [Hearing loss determination and assessment of the reduction in earning capacity taking speech discrimination tests in noise into account].

Authors:  C Thiele; H Sukowski; K Wagener; B Kollmeier; T Lenarz; A Lesinski-Schiedat
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 1.284

3.  [Evaluation of the Oldenburg children's rhyme test in silence and in noise].

Authors:  K C Wagener; T Brand; B Kollmeier
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 1.284

4.  [Improving speech comprehension using a new cochlear implant speech processor].

Authors:  J Müller-Deile; T Kortmann; U Hoppe; H Hessel; A Morsnowski
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 1.284

5.  [Comparison of different speech intelligibility tests in German language (Freiburg speech test vs. Göttingen sentence test and monosyllabic rhyme test)].

Authors:  H Sukowski; T Brand; K C Wagener; B Kollmeier
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 1.284

6.  A maximum-likelihood procedure for estimating psychometric functions: thresholds, slopes, and lapses of attention.

Authors:  Yi Shen; Virginia M Richards
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  [Speech intelligibility tests in cochlear implant patients].

Authors:  J Müller-Deile
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 1.284

8.  A Series of Case Studies of Tinnitus Suppression With Mixed Background Stimuli in a Cochlear Implant.

Authors:  Richard S Tyler; A J Keiner; Kurt Walker; Aniruddha K Deshpande; Shelley Witt; Matthijs Killian; Helena Ji; Jim Patrick; Norbert Dillier; Pim van Dijk; Wai Kong Lai; Marlan R Hansen; Bruce Gantz
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 1.493

9.  Laboratory and field study of the potential benefits of pinna cue-preserving hearing aids.

Authors:  Niels Søgaard Jensen; Tobias Neher; Søren Laugesen; René Burmand Johannesson; Louise Kragelund
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2013-11-10

10.  [Application of new speech intelligibility tests in silence for the assessment of acquired hearing losses].

Authors:  H Sukowski; K C Wagener; C Thiele; S Uppenkamp; B Kollmeier
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 1.284

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.