J Löhler1, L Moser, D Heinrich, K Hörmann, L E Walther. 1. Wissenschaftliches Institut für angewandte HNO-Heilkunde, Deutscher Berufsverband der HNO-Ärzte e. V., Maienbeeck 1, Bad Bramstedt, Germany. loehler@hno-aerzte.de
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Speech audiometry studies do not deliver structured testimony of patients as to the actual benefit of hearing aids based on individual daily life experiences. This deficiency can be resolved by applying structured inventory questionnaires. The APHAB (German version) is an evaluated inventory questionnaire consisting of six questions put to patients with hearing deficiencies with and without hearing aids in four different hearing situations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We collected the APHAB data of 560 patients before and after fitting hearing aids. We also gathered personal data as to age, prior experience with hearing aids, duration of daily use of the hearing aid and degree of hearing loss. RESULTS: The average age of the patients was a little under 70 years, 84% had just received their first hearing aid, and 83% exhibited moderate or severe hearing loss. The APHAB results were classified in percentile and contingency tables. The latter allow one to determine conditional probabilities of the potential success of fitting a hearing aid to a new patient for each APHAB scale. CONCLUSIONS: The APHAB can be applied regularly to measure the benefit of fitting a hearing aid to a patient in particular in problematic hearing situations. By registering the personal view of the patients, it expands the scope of the standard methods (e.g., speech audiometry) so that the quality of diagnostics and therapy can be improved. It qualitatively records the success of hearing aid fitting, predicts potential problem areas and thereby may reduce the number of unused hearing aids.
OBJECTIVE: Speech audiometry studies do not deliver structured testimony of patients as to the actual benefit of hearing aids based on individual daily life experiences. This deficiency can be resolved by applying structured inventory questionnaires. The APHAB (German version) is an evaluated inventory questionnaire consisting of six questions put to patients with hearing deficiencies with and without hearing aids in four different hearing situations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We collected the APHAB data of 560 patients before and after fitting hearing aids. We also gathered personal data as to age, prior experience with hearing aids, duration of daily use of the hearing aid and degree of hearing loss. RESULTS: The average age of the patients was a little under 70 years, 84% had just received their first hearing aid, and 83% exhibited moderate or severe hearing loss. The APHAB results were classified in percentile and contingency tables. The latter allow one to determine conditional probabilities of the potential success of fitting a hearing aid to a new patient for each APHAB scale. CONCLUSIONS: The APHAB can be applied regularly to measure the benefit of fitting a hearing aid to a patient in particular in problematic hearing situations. By registering the personal view of the patients, it expands the scope of the standard methods (e.g., speech audiometry) so that the quality of diagnostics and therapy can be improved. It qualitatively records the success of hearing aid fitting, predicts potential problem areas and thereby may reduce the number of unused hearing aids.
Authors: Janneke Nachtegaal; Jan H Smit; Cas Smits; Pieter D Bezemer; Johannes H M van Beek; Joost M Festen; Sophia E Kramer Journal: Ear Hear Date: 2009-06 Impact factor: 3.570
Authors: D Beutner; W Delb; H Frenzel; U Hoppe; K B Hüttenbrink; R Mlynski; A Limberger; R Schönweiler; B Schwab; I Todt; M Walger; T Wesarg; T Zahnert; R Zeh Journal: HNO Date: 2018-07 Impact factor: 1.284
Authors: D Beutner; W Delb; H Frenzel; U Hoppe; K B Hüttenbrink; R Mlynski; A Limberger; R Schönweiler; B Schwab; I Todt; M Walger; T Wesarg; T Zahnert; R Zeh Journal: HNO Date: 2018-09 Impact factor: 1.284
Authors: Hannes Maier; Uwe Baumann; Wolf-Dieter Baumgartner; Dirk Beutner; Marco D Caversaccio; Thomas Keintzel; Martin Kompis; Thomas Lenarz; Astrid Magele; Torsten Mewes; Alexander Müller; Tobias Rader; Torsten Rahne; Sebastian P Schraven; Burkard Schwab; Georg Mathias Sprinzl; Bernd Strauchmann; Ingo Todt; Thomas Wesarg; Barbara Wollenberg; Stefan K Plontke Journal: Audiol Neurootol Date: 2018-09-07 Impact factor: 1.854
Authors: J Löhler; B Akcicek; B Wollenberg; T Kappe; P Schlattmann; R Schönweiler Journal: Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol Date: 2016-03-14 Impact factor: 2.503