Literature DB >> 17496668

Clinical evaluation of expanded input dynamic range in Nucleus cochlear implants.

P W Dawson1, A E Vandali, M R Knight, J M Heasman.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate whether expanded instantaneous input dynamic ranges (IIDRs) in the Nucleus cochlear implant system benefit speech perception in the laboratory and listening in the real world.
DESIGN: Until recently, Nucleus cochlear implants have used an IIDR of approximately 30 dB. In this study, an IIDR of 31 dB was compared with 46 dB and 56 dB in the SPEAR3 research processor with nine adult implant recipients. Subjects were given two, 2-wk blocks of take-home experience with each of the three IIDRs. A single IIDR setting was used in each trial period. During the take-home experience with the expanded IIDRs, subjects used two programs: a standard program (with clinically measured electrode dynamic ranges) and a program with adjusted thresholds (decreased T levels). After each block of take-home experience, speech perception testing was conducted for CNC words in quiet (at 45 dB and 55 dB SPL) and for CUNY sentences in the presence of multi-taker babble.
RESULTS: On average, CNC word recognition at low presentation levels was significantly better with the 46 dB and 56 dB IIDRs, compared with the 31 dB IIDR; however, there was no significant difference between the 46 dB and 56 dB IIDR conditions. These benefits were greater for standard programs than for reduced T level programs. For CUNY sentences in babble, group results indicated no significant difference in performance across IIDR. The three IIDRs were rated similarly in real-life listening situations, and two of the subjects expressed tolerance problems with the expanded standard IIDRs.
CONCLUSIONS: IIDRs of 46 and 56 dB provided benefit in accessing low-level speech without a decrement in sentence perception in babble. Most subjects accepted the standard, wider IIDR programs in everyday life. No significant differences were found between the 46 dB and 56 dB IIDR programs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17496668     DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3180312651

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ear Hear        ISSN: 0196-0202            Impact factor:   3.570


  14 in total

1.  Optimizing the perception of soft speech and speech in noise with the Advanced Bionics cochlear implant system.

Authors:  Laura K Holden; Ruth M Reeder; Jill B Firszt; Charles C Finley
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2011-01-28       Impact factor: 2.117

2.  Factors contributing to speech perception scores in long-term pediatric cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Lisa S Davidson; Ann E Geers; Peter J Blamey; Emily A Tobey; Christine A Brenner
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 3.570

Review 3.  The development of the Nucleus Freedom Cochlear implant system.

Authors:  James F Patrick; Peter A Busby; Peter J Gibson
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2006-12

4.  Optimization of programming parameters in children with the advanced bionics cochlear implant.

Authors:  Jacquelyn Baudhuin; Jamie Cadieux; Jill B Firszt; Ruth M Reeder; Jerrica L Maxson
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 1.664

5.  [Improving speech comprehension using a new cochlear implant speech processor].

Authors:  J Müller-Deile; T Kortmann; U Hoppe; H Hessel; A Morsnowski
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 1.284

6.  Interdependence of linguistic and indexical speech perception skills in school-age children with early cochlear implantation.

Authors:  Ann E Geers; Lisa S Davidson; Rosalie M Uchanski; Johanna G Nicholas
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  The Effects of Preprocessing Strategies for Pediatric Cochlear Implant Recipients.

Authors:  Bernadette Rakszawski; Rose Wright; Jamie H Cadieux; Lisa S Davidson; Christine Brenner
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 1.664

8.  Benefits from upgrade to the CP810 sound processor for Nucleus 24 cochlear implant recipients.

Authors:  Isabelle Mosnier; Mathieu Marx; Frederic Venail; Natalie Loundon; Samantha Roux-Vaillard; Olivier Sterkers
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013-02-14       Impact factor: 2.503

9.  Evaluation of a New Algorithm to Optimize Audibility in Cochlear Implant Recipients.

Authors:  Laura K Holden; Jill B Firszt; Ruth M Reeder; Noël Y Dwyer; Amy L Stein; Leo M Litvak
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2019 Jul/Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  Electrically Evoked Auditory Event-Related Responses in Patients with Auditory Brainstem Implants: Morphological Characteristics, Test-Retest Reliability, Effects of Stimulation Level, and Association with Auditory Detection.

Authors:  Shuman He; Tyler C McFayden; Holly F B Teagle; Matthew Ewend; Lillian Henderson; Craig A Buchman
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2016 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.