Literature DB >> 18679664

Observational practice of relative but not absolute motion features in a single-limb multi-joint coordination task.

John J Buchanan1, Young U Ryu, Kirk Zihlman, David L Wright.   

Abstract

The learning of relative and absolute motion features as a function of physical (actor group) and observational (observer group) practice was examined in a rhythmic single limb multi-joint coordination task. The task required the participants to learn a 90 degrees relative phase pattern between the elbow and wrist in combination with an absolute elbow joint angle of 80 degrees and a wrist joint angle of 48 degrees . Each actor practiced the required relative and absolute motion features for 2 days while being watched by an observer. Overall, the actor group was characterized by an improvement in performance on the relative phase component and showed a clear differentiation in joint amplitudes. In a 24-h retention test, the observer group more closely matched the performance of the actors on the relative phase component in comparison to a control group that was not exposed to physical or observational practice. However, the observer and control groups did not demonstrate a clear differentiation in required joint amplitudes. In agreement with Scully and Newell (1985), we conclude that relative phase may be classified as a relative motion feature that may be picked through observation and benefit initial physical performance, whereas the joint amplitudes may be classified as absolute motion features that require physical practice to achieve the appropriate scaling.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18679664     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-008-1512-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  44 in total

Review 1.  Coordination.

Authors:  M T Turvey
Journal:  Am Psychol       Date:  1990-08

2.  Order parameters for the neural organization of single, multijoint limb movement patterns.

Authors:  J A Kelso; J J Buchanan; S A Wallace
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Hierarchical control of different elbow-wrist coordination patterns.

Authors:  N V Dounskaia; S P Swinnen; C B Walter; A J Spaepen; S M Verschueren
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Learning a new bimanual coordination pattern: reciprocal influences of intrinsic and to-be-learned patterns.

Authors:  R J Fontaine; T D Lee; S P Swinnen
Journal:  Can J Exp Psychol       Date:  1997-03

5.  The dynamics of bimanual circle drawing.

Authors:  R G Carson; J Thomas; J J Summers; M R Walters; A Semjen
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  1997-08

6.  A synergetic theory of environmentally-specified and learned patterns of movement coordination. I. Relative phase dynamics.

Authors:  G Schöner; J A Kelso
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 2.086

7.  Posturally induced transitions in rhythmic multijoint limb movements.

Authors:  J J Buchanan; J A Kelso
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Human movement coordination implicates relative direction as the information for relative phase.

Authors:  Andrew D Wilson; David R Collins; Geoffrey P Bingham
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-05-14       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Learning as a function of coordination bias: building upon pre-practice behaviours.

Authors:  Nicola J Hodges; Ian M Franks
Journal:  Hum Mov Sci       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 2.161

10.  Learning a single limb multijoint coordination pattern: the impact of a mechanical constraint on the coordination dynamics of learning and transfer.

Authors:  John J Buchanan
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-12-19       Impact factor: 1.972

View more
  13 in total

1.  Learning through observation: a combination of expert and novice models favors learning.

Authors:  Hassan Rohbanfard; Luc Proteau
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-10-11       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Absence of after-effects for observers after watching a visuomotor adaptation.

Authors:  Nicole T Ong; Nicola J Hodges
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-07-23       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Observational practice benefits are limited to perceptual improvements in the acquisition of a novel coordination skill.

Authors:  Dana Maslovat; Nicola J Hodges; Olav E Krigolson; Todd C Handy
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-05-23       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Observation and physical practice: different practice contexts lead to similar outcomes for the acquisition of kinematic information.

Authors:  John J Buchanan; Inchon Park
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2015-11-19

Review 5.  Perception and action influences on discrete and reciprocal bimanual coordination.

Authors:  Charles H Shea; John J Buchanan; Deanna M Kennedy
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-04

6.  Observation learning of a motor task: who and when?

Authors:  Mathieu Andrieux; Luc Proteau
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-06-08       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Specificity in practice benefits learning in novice models and variability in demonstration benefits observational practice.

Authors:  John J Buchanan; Noah J Dean
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2009-09-02

8.  The perception-action dynamics of action competency are altered by both physical and observational training.

Authors:  John J Buchanan; Jorge Ramos; Nina Robson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-01-25       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  The role of auditory and visual models in the production of bimanual tapping patterns.

Authors:  Deanna M Kennedy; Jason B Boyle; Charles H Shea
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-11-15       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Mixed observation favors motor learning through better estimation of the model's performance.

Authors:  Mathieu Andrieux; Luc Proteau
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-06-05       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.