Literature DB >> 26586292

Observation and physical practice: different practice contexts lead to similar outcomes for the acquisition of kinematic information.

John J Buchanan1, Inchon Park2.   

Abstract

This study differentiated the contributions of physical and observational practice to the learning of a single-limb multi-joint coordination pattern. Three groups (physical-practice, observation-practice, observation-physical) practiced for 2 days and were given two performance tests 24 h after the second practice session. The performance tests revealed that physical and observational practice contributed similarly to identifying and using kinematic information related to the relative motion direction between joints (lead/lag relationship) and to the to-be-learned relative phase pattern (ϕ = 90°). Physical practice resulted in more stable coordination during performance tests and in the ability to produce different joint amplitudes with less variability. A serendipitous finding was that maximum elbow flexion (point of movement reversal) emerged as a kinematic event around which elbow and wrist coordination were organized. Movement reversals often serve to anchor the movement dynamics, and this anchoring effect was evident following both physical and observational practice, yet physical practice resulted in an advantage with regard to this anchor point on several kinematic measures. The results are discussed within the context of contemporary behavioral theories (coordination dynamics, visual perception perspective) of observational learning.

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26586292     DOI: 10.1007/s00426-015-0723-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Res        ISSN: 0340-0727


  51 in total

1.  Physical and observational practice afford unique learning opportunities.

Authors:  C H Shea; D L Wright; G Wulf; C Whitacre
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 1.328

2.  Perceptual and attentional influences on continuous 2:1 and 3:2 multi-frequency bimanual coordination.

Authors:  Attila J Kovacs; John J Buchanan; Charles H Shea
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 3.  Motor skill acquisition.

Authors:  K M Newell
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 24.137

4.  Generalization of action knowledge following observational learning.

Authors:  John J Buchanan; David L Wright
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2010-12-24

5.  Observational practice of relative but not absolute motion features in a single-limb multi-joint coordination task.

Authors:  John J Buchanan; Young U Ryu; Kirk Zihlman; David L Wright
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-08-05       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Order parameters for the neural organization of single, multijoint limb movement patterns.

Authors:  J A Kelso; J J Buchanan; S A Wallace
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Consistently modeling the same movement strategy is more important than model skill level in observational learning contexts.

Authors:  John J Buchanan; Noah Dean
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2013-12-18

8.  A comparison of intra- and inter-limb relative motion information in modelling a novel motor skill.

Authors:  Gavin Breslin; Nicola J Hodges; A Mark Williams; J Kremer; W Curran
Journal:  Hum Mov Sci       Date:  2006-08-01       Impact factor: 2.161

9.  Mixed observation favors motor learning through better estimation of the model's performance.

Authors:  Mathieu Andrieux; Luc Proteau
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-06-05       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Specificity of task constraints and effects of visual demonstrations and verbal instructions in directing learners' search during skill acquisition.

Authors:  S A Al-Abood; K F Davids; S J Bennett
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 1.328

View more
  1 in total

1.  The simplest acquisition protocol is sometimes the best protocol: performing and learning a 1:2 bimanual coordination task.

Authors:  Stefan Panzer; Deanna Kennedy; Chaoyi Wang; Charles H Shea
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-12-14       Impact factor: 1.972

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.