Literature DB >> 20496059

Observational practice benefits are limited to perceptual improvements in the acquisition of a novel coordination skill.

Dana Maslovat1, Nicola J Hodges, Olav E Krigolson, Todd C Handy.   

Abstract

There is disagreement about the effectiveness of observational practice for the acquisition of novel coordination skills and the type of processes involved in observation of novel movements. In this study, we examined learning of a bimanual 90 degrees phase offset through comparisons of three groups; physical practice, observational practice and no practice (n = 12/group). Groups were compared before and after practice on perception and production scans of the practised pattern. The observation group was yoked to the physical group such that observers watched repeated demonstrations of a learning model. Although there were no positive effects of observational practice for physical performance measures, the observation group did not differ from the physical practice group and was more accurate than controls on perceptual discrimination measures after practice. We concluded that observation of a novel bimanual movement can aid perception but that physical practice is necessary for immediate physical performance benefits. These results are discussed in terms of cognitive mediation models of motor skill learning.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20496059     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-010-2302-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  47 in total

1.  Physical and observational practice afford unique learning opportunities.

Authors:  C H Shea; D L Wright; G Wulf; C Whitacre
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 1.328

Review 2.  Electrophysiology of action representation.

Authors:  Luciano Fadiga; Laila Craighero
Journal:  J Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2004 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.177

3.  Evaluation of scanning methodology in bimanual coordination.

Authors:  Dana Maslovat; Shannon S D Bredin; Romeo Chua; Ian M Franks
Journal:  Motor Control       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 1.422

4.  Action observation and acquired motor skills: an FMRI study with expert dancers.

Authors:  B Calvo-Merino; D E Glaser; J Grèzes; R E Passingham; P Haggard
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2004-12-22       Impact factor: 5.357

5.  Observational practice of relative but not absolute motion features in a single-limb multi-joint coordination task.

Authors:  John J Buchanan; Young U Ryu; Kirk Zihlman; David L Wright
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-08-05       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 6.  Imaging motor imagery: methodological issues related to expertise.

Authors:  John Milton; Steven L Small; Ana Solodkin
Journal:  Methods       Date:  2008-06-02       Impact factor: 3.608

7.  Effect of information load and time on observational learning.

Authors:  Gavin Breslin; Nicola J Hodges; A Mark Williams
Journal:  Res Q Exerc Sport       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 2.500

8.  A comparison of intra- and inter-limb relative motion information in modelling a novel motor skill.

Authors:  Gavin Breslin; Nicola J Hodges; A Mark Williams; J Kremer; W Curran
Journal:  Hum Mov Sci       Date:  2006-08-01       Impact factor: 2.161

9.  Learning as a function of coordination bias: building upon pre-practice behaviours.

Authors:  Nicola J Hodges; Ian M Franks
Journal:  Hum Mov Sci       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 2.161

10.  Learning a single limb multijoint coordination pattern: the impact of a mechanical constraint on the coordination dynamics of learning and transfer.

Authors:  John J Buchanan
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-12-19       Impact factor: 1.972

View more
  18 in total

1.  Long- and short-term plastic modeling of action prediction abilities in volleyball.

Authors:  Cosimo Urgesi; Maria Maddalena Savonitto; Franco Fabbro; Salvatore M Aglioti
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2011-11-02

Review 2.  Perception and action influences on discrete and reciprocal bimanual coordination.

Authors:  Charles H Shea; John J Buchanan; Deanna M Kennedy
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-04

3.  Manipulating visual-motor experience to probe for observation-induced after-effects in adaptation learning.

Authors:  Shannon B Lim; Beverley C Larssen; Nicola J Hodges
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-12-04       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Fluid intelligence and working memory support dissociable aspects of learning by physical but not observational practice.

Authors:  Dace Apšvalka; Emily S Cross; Richard Ramsey
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2019-05-14

5.  The perception-action dynamics of action competency are altered by both physical and observational training.

Authors:  John J Buchanan; Jorge Ramos; Nina Robson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-01-25       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  The role of auditory and visual models in the production of bimanual tapping patterns.

Authors:  Deanna M Kennedy; Jason B Boyle; Charles H Shea
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-11-15       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  What we think we learn from watching others: the moderating role of ability on perceptions of learning from observation.

Authors:  Nicola J Hodges; Thomas Coppola
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2014-06-21

8.  A safety mechanism for observational learning.

Authors:  Arnaud Badets; Arnaud Boutin; Thomas Michelet
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-04

9.  The simplest acquisition protocol is sometimes the best protocol: performing and learning a 1:2 bimanual coordination task.

Authors:  Stefan Panzer; Deanna Kennedy; Chaoyi Wang; Charles H Shea
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-12-14       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Transfer of learning between unimanual and bimanual rhythmic movement coordination: transfer is a function of the task dynamic.

Authors:  Winona Snapp-Childs; Andrew D Wilson; Geoffrey P Bingham
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-05-01       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.