Literature DB >> 23229772

The role of auditory and visual models in the production of bimanual tapping patterns.

Deanna M Kennedy1, Jason B Boyle, Charles H Shea.   

Abstract

An experiment was designed to determine the effectiveness of auditory and visual models in the learning of a 2:3 bimanual tapping pattern. Participants were randomly assigned to an auditory model, visual model, auditory + visual model, or a control (visual metronome) group. The task for all groups was to tap a left side force transducer with the left hand and a right side force transducer with the right hand in attempt to produce the desired 2:3 bimanual coordination pattern. The auditory model consisted of a series of tones representing the goal pattern played prior to each practice trial. The visual model consisted of a visual display representing the goal tapping pattern. Visual pacing metronomes were provided to the control group. The right and left side metronomes flashed during the trial in a pattern representing the goal tapping pattern. Subjects in all groups performed 14 practice trials consisting of 15 s each devoted to tapping the goal pattern (total practice time = 3.5 min). A retention test without the aid of the models or metronomes was administered following the practice trials. The results for the model groups indicated extremely effective performance of the bimanual coordination patterns for the auditory, visual, and auditory + visual model conditions with not only the relative, but also the absolute characteristics of the models exhibited during retention testing. Retention performance for the visual metronome condition was less accurate and more variable than the three model conditions. In addition, the auditory + visual model condition resulted in retention performance that was more stable than the auditory model condition.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23229772     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-012-3326-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  49 in total

1.  Perceptual and attentional influences on continuous 2:1 and 3:2 multi-frequency bimanual coordination.

Authors:  Attila J Kovacs; John J Buchanan; Charles H Shea
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Generalization of action knowledge following observational learning.

Authors:  John J Buchanan; David L Wright
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2010-12-24

3.  Multisensory gain within and across hemispaces in simple and choice reaction time paradigms.

Authors:  Simon Girard; Olivier Collignon; Franco Lepore
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-12-15       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Observational practice of relative but not absolute motion features in a single-limb multi-joint coordination task.

Authors:  John J Buchanan; Young U Ryu; Kirk Zihlman; David L Wright
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-08-05       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Multifrequency behavioral patterns and the phase attractive circle map.

Authors:  G C deGuzman; J A Kelso
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.086

6.  Continuous concurrent feedback degrades skill learning: implications for training and simulation.

Authors:  R A Schmidt; G Wulf
Journal:  Hum Factors       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 2.888

7.  Increasingly complex bimanual multi-frequency coordination patterns are equally easy to perform with on-line relative velocity feedback.

Authors:  Jason Boyles; Stefan Panzer; Charles H Shea
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-11-26       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Learning a coordinated rhythmic movement with task-appropriate coordination feedback.

Authors:  Andrew D Wilson; Winona Snapp-Childs; Rachel Coats; Geoffrey P Bingham
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-08-12       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Overcoming the guidance effect in motor skill learning: feedback all the time can be beneficial.

Authors:  John J Buchanan; Chaoyi Wang
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-04-13       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Auditory model enhances relative-timing learning.

Authors:  Qin Lai; Charles H Shea; Lisa Bruechert; Mark Little
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 1.328

View more
  11 in total

Review 1.  Perception and action influences on discrete and reciprocal bimanual coordination.

Authors:  Charles H Shea; John J Buchanan; Deanna M Kennedy
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-04

2.  Sonification and haptic feedback in addition to visual feedback enhances complex motor task learning.

Authors:  Roland Sigrist; Georg Rauter; Laura Marchal-Crespo; Robert Riener; Peter Wolf
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-12-16       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Rhythmical bimanual force production: homologous and non-homologous muscles.

Authors:  Deanna M Kennedy; Jason B Boyle; Joohyun Rhee; Charles H Shea
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-09-24       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  The simplest acquisition protocol is sometimes the best protocol: performing and learning a 1:2 bimanual coordination task.

Authors:  Stefan Panzer; Deanna Kennedy; Chaoyi Wang; Charles H Shea
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-12-14       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 5.  The Effects of Sensory Manipulations on Motor Behavior: From Basic Science to Clinical Rehabilitation.

Authors:  Taisei Sugiyama; Sook-Lei Liew
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  2016-12-09       Impact factor: 1.328

6.  Optimizing the control of high-ID movements: rethinking the power of the visual display.

Authors:  Jason B Boyle; Stefan Panzer; Chaoyi Wang; Deanna Kennedy; Charles H Shea
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-10-04       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Is there a link between sensorimotor coordination and inter-manual coordination? Differential effects of auditory and/or visual rhythmic stimulations.

Authors:  Mélody Blais; Jean-Michel Albaret; Jessica Tallet
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-08-04       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Movement Sonification: Effects on Motor Learning beyond Rhythmic Adjustments.

Authors:  Alfred O Effenberg; Ursula Fehse; Gerd Schmitz; Bjoern Krueger; Heinz Mechling
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2016-05-27       Impact factor: 4.677

9.  Transposing musical skill: sonification of movement as concurrent augmented feedback enhances learning in a bimanual task.

Authors:  John Dyer; Paul Stapleton; Matthew Rodger
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2016-05-27

10.  Advantages of melodic over rhythmic movement sonification in bimanual motor skill learning.

Authors:  J F Dyer; P Stapleton; M W M Rodger
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-07-26       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.