Literature DB >> 14689134

Learning a single limb multijoint coordination pattern: the impact of a mechanical constraint on the coordination dynamics of learning and transfer.

John J Buchanan1.   

Abstract

The coordination dynamics of learning and transfer were studied in a single limb multijoint task requiring rhythmic elbow and wrist motions. Participants were required to learn a continuous 90 degrees relative phase pattern between the elbow and wrist such that an angle-angle plot of elbow and wrist motion produced a circle with a diameter of 80 degrees. Joint motion was restricted to elbow and wrist flexion-extension on the sagittal plane and the to-be-learned 90 degrees relative phase pattern was always practiced with the learning arm supine. Cycling frequency was controlled by a pacing metronome set at 0.75 Hz. Issues regarding effector-independent and effector-specific transfer were addressed with three transfer conditions: (1). learning arm prone (LP), (2). non-learning arm supine (NS), and (3). non-learning arm prone (NP). Four subjects learned the required relative phase (90 degrees ) and amplitude (80 degrees ) pattern with their dominant arm and four with their non-dominant arm. The experiment produced three main findings with regard to elbow-wrist control processes: First, seven of eight participants spontaneously produced a wrist-lagging coordination pattern (wrist motion lagged elbow motion) in learning to produce a continuous relative phase pattern of 90 degrees between the elbow and wrist. The wrist-lagging pattern may emerge as a result of the central nervous system exploiting the transfer of angular momentum from the elbow to the wrist as the elbow rotates up and down. The influence of interactive torque on elbow-wrist coordination represents an important mechanical constraint on the selection of intralimb coordination strategies during learning. The transfer conditions revealed that this mechanical constraint was effector-independent with regard to ipsilateral limb transfer (LP) and contralateral limb transfer (NS and NP). Second, consistent transfer of the learned relative phase pattern across ipsilateral and contralateral conditions demonstrates an effector-independent representation for this control variable. The effector-independent and effector-specific nature of joint amplitude transfer was dependent to some degree on learning arm, dominant or non-dominant, and the amount of practice, 1 day versus 5 days. Third, learning of the required 90 degrees relative phase pattern may be characterized as a phase transition leading to the formation of a stable attractor in the elbow-wrist coordination landscape. The above findings are discussed with respect to motor programming and coordination dynamic viewpoints on effector-independent and effector-specific aspects of motor equivalence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14689134     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-003-1763-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  30 in total

1.  Differences in control of limb dynamics during dominant and nondominant arm reaching.

Authors:  R L Sainburg; D Kalakanis
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Dynamical aspects of learning an interlimb rhythmic movement pattern.

Authors:  R C Schmidt; P J Treffner; B K Shaw; M T Turvey
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 1.328

3.  Order parameters for the neural organization of single, multijoint limb movement patterns.

Authors:  J A Kelso; J J Buchanan; S A Wallace
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Hierarchical control of different elbow-wrist coordination patterns.

Authors:  N V Dounskaia; S P Swinnen; C B Walter; A J Spaepen; S M Verschueren
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Asymmetry in the human motor cortex and handedness.

Authors:  K Amunts; G Schlaug; A Schleicher; H Steinmetz; A Dabringhaus; P E Roland; K Zilles
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Learning a new bimanual coordination pattern: reciprocal influences of intrinsic and to-be-learned patterns.

Authors:  R J Fontaine; T D Lee; S P Swinnen
Journal:  Can J Exp Psychol       Date:  1997-03

7.  A synergetic theory of environmentally-specified and learned patterns of movement coordination. I. Relative phase dynamics.

Authors:  G Schöner; J A Kelso
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 2.086

8.  Proprioceptive control of interjoint coordination.

Authors:  C Ghez; R Sainburg
Journal:  Can J Physiol Pharmacol       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 2.273

9.  Control of limb dynamics in normal subjects and patients without proprioception.

Authors:  R L Sainburg; M F Ghilardi; H Poizner; C Ghez
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Posturally induced transitions in rhythmic multijoint limb movements.

Authors:  J J Buchanan; J A Kelso
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 1.972

View more
  16 in total

1.  A novel shoulder-elbow mechanism for increasing speed in a multijoint arm movement.

Authors:  Derek B Debicki; Sherry Watts; Paul L Gribble; Jon Hore
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-05-08       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Observational practice benefits are limited to perceptual improvements in the acquisition of a novel coordination skill.

Authors:  Dana Maslovat; Nicola J Hodges; Olav E Krigolson; Todd C Handy
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-05-23       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 3.  Perception and action influences on discrete and reciprocal bimanual coordination.

Authors:  Charles H Shea; John J Buchanan; Deanna M Kennedy
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-04

Review 4.  The internal model and the leading joint hypothesis: implications for control of multi-joint movements.

Authors:  Natalia Dounskaia
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-08-13       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Influence of predominant patterns of coordination on the exploitation of interaction torques in a two-joint rhythmic arm movement.

Authors:  Aymar de Rugy; Stephan Riek; Richard G Carson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-06-09       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Observational practice of relative but not absolute motion features in a single-limb multi-joint coordination task.

Authors:  John J Buchanan; Young U Ryu; Kirk Zihlman; David L Wright
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-08-05       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Inter-joint coordination in producing kicking velocity of taekwondo kicks.

Authors:  Young Kwan Kim; Yoon Hyuk Kim; Shin Ja Im
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2011-03-01       Impact factor: 2.988

8.  Deliberate utilization of interaction torques brakes elbow extension in a fast throwing motion.

Authors:  Jon Hore; Derek B Debicki; Paul L Gribble; Sherry Watts
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-04-06       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Force synchrony enhances the stability of rhythmic multi-joint arm coordination.

Authors:  Jelena Stosic; Timothy J Carroll; Aymar de Rugy
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-07-07       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  The perception-action dynamics of action competency are altered by both physical and observational training.

Authors:  John J Buchanan; Jorge Ramos; Nina Robson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-01-25       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.