Literature DB >> 20652689

Absence of after-effects for observers after watching a visuomotor adaptation.

Nicole T Ong1, Nicola J Hodges.   

Abstract

We tested whether observational practice would elicit after-effects in a normal environment following observation of an actor performing in a perturbed visuomotor environment. Two actor groups (with and without vision of the hand) practised reaching to visual targets with the cursor rotated 30 degrees to the actual hand movement. An observer group viewed this adaptation. Observers demonstrated significant learning when they subsequently performed the aiming task in the perturbed environment. However, different from both actor groups, observers did not show after-effects in the normal visuomotor condition. Our findings imply that there is a qualitative difference in the processes between observational and physical practice and suggest that physical exposure is required to update an internal model of the visuomotor environment.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20652689     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-010-2366-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  31 in total

1.  Keeping perception accurate.

Authors: 
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 20.229

2.  Selective use of perceptual recalibration versus visuomotor skill acquisition.

Authors:  D M Clower; D Boussaoud
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Physical and observational practice afford unique learning opportunities.

Authors:  C H Shea; D L Wright; G Wulf; C Whitacre
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 1.328

4.  Representational guidance of action production in observational learning: a causal analysis.

Authors:  W R Carroll; A Bandura
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 1.328

5.  An implicit plan overrides an explicit strategy during visuomotor adaptation.

Authors:  Pietro Mazzoni; John W Krakauer
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-04-05       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Observational modeling effects for movement dynamics and movement outcome measures across differing task constraints: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Derek Ashford; Simon J Bennett; Keith Davids
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 1.328

7.  Enhancement of force after action observation: behavioural and neurophysiological studies.

Authors:  Carlo A Porro; Patrizia Facchin; Simonetta Fusi; Guanita Dri; Luciano Fadiga
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2007-06-30       Impact factor: 3.139

8.  Observational practice of relative but not absolute motion features in a single-limb multi-joint coordination task.

Authors:  John J Buchanan; Young U Ryu; Kirk Zihlman; David L Wright
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-08-05       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Scaling a motor skill through observation and practice.

Authors:  Spencer J Hayes; Nicola J Hodges; Mark A Scott; Robert R Horn; A Mark Williams
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 1.328

10.  The anthropomorphic brain: the mirror neuron system responds to human and robotic actions.

Authors:  V Gazzola; G Rizzolatti; B Wicker; C Keysers
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-02-13       Impact factor: 6.556

View more
  13 in total

1.  In the absence of physical practice, observation and imagery do not result in updating of internal models for aiming.

Authors:  Nicole T Ong; Beverley C Larssen; Nicola J Hodges
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-01-10       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Long- and short-term plastic modeling of action prediction abilities in volleyball.

Authors:  Cosimo Urgesi; Maria Maddalena Savonitto; Franco Fabbro; Salvatore M Aglioti
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2011-11-02

3.  State dependence of adaptation of force output following movement observation.

Authors:  Paul A Wanda; Gang Li; Kurt A Thoroughman
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-06-12       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Manipulating visual-motor experience to probe for observation-induced after-effects in adaptation learning.

Authors:  Shannon B Lim; Beverley C Larssen; Nicola J Hodges
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-12-04       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Dissociable contributions of motor-execution and action-observation to intramanual transfer.

Authors:  Spencer J Hayes; Digby Elliott; Matthew Andrew; James W Roberts; Simon J Bennett
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-07-22       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Assessing and defining explicit processes in visuomotor adaptation.

Authors:  S Heirani Moghaddam; R Chua; E K Cressman
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2021-04-28       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Serial practice impairs motor skill consolidation.

Authors:  Kristin-Marie Neville; Maxime Trempe
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Direct-effects and after-effects of visuomotor adaptation with one arm on subsequent performance with the other arm.

Authors:  Jinsung Wang; Yuming Lei
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-05-27       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Motor learning without movement.

Authors:  Olivia A Kim; Alexander D Forrence; Samuel D McDougle
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-07-19       Impact factor: 12.779

10.  Watch and learn: seeing is better than doing when acquiring consecutive motor tasks.

Authors:  Beverley C Larssen; Nicole T Ong; Nicola J Hodges
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-06-18       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.