Literature DB >> 15895217

Human movement coordination implicates relative direction as the information for relative phase.

Andrew D Wilson1, David R Collins, Geoffrey P Bingham.   

Abstract

The current studies explore the informational basis of the coupling in human rhythmic movement coordination tasks. Movement stability in these tasks is an asymmetric U-shaped function of mean relative phase; 0 degrees is maximally stable, 90 degrees is maximally unstable and 180 degrees is intermediate. Bingham (2001, 2004a, 2004b) hypothesized that the information used to perform coordinated rhythmic movement is the relative direction of movement, the resolution of which is determined by relative speed. We used an experimental paradigm that entails using a circular movement to produce a linear motion of a dot on a screen, which must then be coordinated with a linearly moving computer controlled dot. This adds a component to the movement that is orthogonal to the display. Relative direction is not uniquely defined between orthogonal components of motion, but relative speed is; it was therefore predicted that the addition of the component would only introduce a symmetric noise component and not otherwise contribute to the U-shape structure of movement stability. Results for experiment 1 supported the hypothesis; movement that involved the additional component was overall less stable than movement that involved only the parallel component along which relative direction can be defined. Two additional studies ruled out alternative explanations for the pattern of data in experiment 1. Overall, the results strongly implicate relative direction as the information underlying performance in rhythmic movement coordination tasks.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15895217     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-005-2301-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  18 in total

1.  The effect of frequency on the visual perception of relative phase and phase variability of two oscillating objects.

Authors:  G P Bingham; F T Zaal; J A Shull; D R Collins
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Perceptual basis of bimanual coordination.

Authors:  F Mechsner; D Kerzel; G Knoblich; W Prinz
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-11-01       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  The synchronization of human arm movements to external events.

Authors:  M J Buekers; H P Bogaerts; S P Swinnen; W F Helsen
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2000-09-01       Impact factor: 3.046

4.  Proprioceptive perception of phase variability.

Authors:  Andrew D Wilson; Geoffrey P Bingham; James C Craig
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Spatial constraints in bimanual coordination: influences of effector orientation.

Authors:  Timothy D Lee; Quincy J Almeida; Romeo Chua
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2002-07-26       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Exploring interlimb constraints during bimanual graphic performance: effects of muscle grouping and direction.

Authors:  S P Swinnen; K Jardin; S Verschueren; R Meulenbroek; L Franz; N Dounskaia; C B Walter
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Relational invariance and visual space perception: on perceptual vector analysis of the optic flow.

Authors:  G Johansson
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  1986-12

8.  A theoretical model of phase transitions in human hand movements.

Authors:  H Haken; J A Kelso; H Bunz
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 2.086

9.  S-R compatibility between response position and destination of apparent motion: evidence of the detection of affordances.

Authors:  C F Michaels
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Visual perception of the relative phasing of human limb movements.

Authors:  G P Bingham; R C Schmidt; F T Zaal
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1999-02
View more
  25 in total

1.  Bimanual Fitts' tasks: Kelso, Southard, and Goodman, 1979 revisited.

Authors:  Charles H Shea; Jason Boyle; Attila J Kovacs
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-11-02       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Vision-to-event and movement-to-event coordination in an unimanual circling task.

Authors:  Sandra Dietrich; Wolfgang Prinz; Martina Rieger
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-01-26       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  The stability of rhythmic movement coordination depends on relative speed: the Bingham model supported.

Authors:  Winona Snapp-Childs; Andrew D Wilson; Geoffrey P Bingham
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-09-28       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Observation and physical practice: different practice contexts lead to similar outcomes for the acquisition of kinematic information.

Authors:  John J Buchanan; Inchon Park
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2015-11-19

Review 5.  Perception and action influences on discrete and reciprocal bimanual coordination.

Authors:  Charles H Shea; John J Buchanan; Deanna M Kennedy
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-04

6.  The coordination patterns observed when two hands reach-to-grasp separate objects.

Authors:  Geoffrey P Bingham; Kirstie Hughes; Mark Mon-Williams
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-08-29       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Observational practice of relative but not absolute motion features in a single-limb multi-joint coordination task.

Authors:  John J Buchanan; Young U Ryu; Kirk Zihlman; David L Wright
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-08-05       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Location but not amount of stimulus occlusion influences the stability of visuo-motor coordination.

Authors:  Alen Hajnal; Michael J Richardson; Steven J Harrison; R C Schmidt
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-08-06       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  The perception-action dynamics of action competency are altered by both physical and observational training.

Authors:  John J Buchanan; Jorge Ramos; Nina Robson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-01-25       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Perceptuo-motor learning rate declines by half from 20s to 70/80s.

Authors:  Rachel O Coats; Winona Snapp-Childs; Andrew D Wilson; Geoffrey P Bingham
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-12-02       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.