Literature DB >> 18637086

Utilizing intraluminal pressure gradients to predict esophageal clearance: a validation study.

John E Pandolfino1, Sudip K Ghosh, Nilesh Lodhia, Peter J Kahrilas.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Esophageal bolus clearance requires a preferential esophagogastric pressure gradient sustained for a sufficient period. We aimed to validate a high-resolution manometry (HRM) paradigm for predicting bolus clearance.
METHODS: Twenty volunteers and 30 patients were studied with HRM during barium swallows with concurrent fluoroscopy. Simultaneous bolus domain pressure and esophagogastric junction (EGJ) obstruction pressure were plotted and flow permissive time was tallied during which the bolus domain pressure exceeded the EGJ obstruction pressure. Distal peristaltic integrity was assessed at incrementally increasing pressure isobaric contour thresholds from 15-40 mmHg. ROC analysis was performed to assess the sensitivity and specificity of cutoff values for flow permissive time and peristaltic amplitude for predicting incomplete clearance as verified fluoroscopically.
RESULTS: Flow permissive time < or =2.5 s had a sensitivity of 86% and specificity of 92% for predicting incomplete clearance. In contrast, a 30-mmHg peristaltic amplitude had a sensitivity of only 48% and specificity of 88%. Incomplete clearance was variably attributable to functional EGJ obstruction, hiatus hernia, or impaired peristalsis.
CONCLUSIONS: A detailed analysis of intraluminal pressure gradients in the distal esophagus and across the EGJ in the postdeglutitive period predicts esophageal bolus clearance with far greater accuracy than any threshold value of peristaltic amplitude.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18637086      PMCID: PMC2887307          DOI: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2008.01913.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0002-9270            Impact factor:   10.864


  9 in total

1.  High-resolution manometry predicts the success of oesophageal bolus transport and identifies clinically important abnormalities not detected by conventional manometry.

Authors:  M Fox; G Hebbard; P Janiak; J G Brasseur; S Ghosh; M Thumshirn; M Fried; W Schwizer
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 3.598

2.  Quantifying esophageal peristalsis with high-resolution manometry: a study of 75 asymptomatic volunteers.

Authors:  Sudip K Ghosh; John E Pandolfino; Qing Zhang; Andrew Jarosz; Nimeesh Shah; Peter J Kahrilas
Journal:  Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol       Date:  2006-01-12       Impact factor: 4.052

3.  Utilizing intraluminal pressure differences to predict esophageal bolus flow dynamics.

Authors:  Sudip K Ghosh; Peter J Kahrilas; Nilesh Lodhia; John E Pandolfino
Journal:  Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol       Date:  2007-09-13       Impact factor: 4.052

4.  Topography of the esophageal peristaltic pressure wave.

Authors:  R E Clouse; A Staiano
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1991-10

5.  Determinants of intrabolus pressure during esophageal peristaltic bolus transport.

Authors:  J Ren; B T Massey; W J Dodds; M K Kern; J G Brasseur; R Shaker; S S Harrington; W J Hogan; R C Arndorfer
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1993-03

6.  Esophagogastric junction distensibility: a factor contributing to sphincter incompetence.

Authors:  John E Pandolfino; Guoxiang Shi; Jennifer Curry; Raymond J Joehl; James G Brasseur; Peter J Kahrilas
Journal:  Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 4.052

7.  The mechanical basis of impaired esophageal emptying postfundoplication.

Authors:  Sudip K Ghosh; Peter J Kahrilas; Tamer Zaki; John E Pandolfino; Raymond J Joehl; James G Brasseur
Journal:  Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol       Date:  2005-02-03       Impact factor: 4.052

8.  Intrabolus pressure gradient identifies pathological constriction in the upper esophageal sphincter during flow.

Authors:  Anupam Pal; Rohan B Williams; Ian J Cook; James G Brasseur
Journal:  Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol       Date:  2003-07-03       Impact factor: 4.052

9.  Obesity: a challenge to esophagogastric junction integrity.

Authors:  John E Pandolfino; Hashem B El-Serag; Qing Zhang; Nimeesh Shah; Sudip K Ghosh; Peter J Kahrilas
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 22.682

  9 in total
  21 in total

Review 1.  Impedance as an adjunct to manometric testing to investigate symptoms of dysphagia: What it has failed to do and what it may tell us in the future.

Authors:  T Omari; J Tack; N Rommel
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 4.623

2.  Adding a radial dimension to the assessment of esophagogastric junction relaxation: validation studies of the 3D-eSleeve.

Authors:  Frédéric Nicodème; John E Pandolfino; Zhiyue Lin; Yinglian Xiao; Gabriela Escobar; Peter J Kahrilas
Journal:  Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol       Date:  2012-05-24       Impact factor: 4.052

3.  Effects of gastric band adjustments on intraluminal pressure.

Authors:  Paul Robert Burton; Wendy A Brown; Cheryl Laurie; Melissa Richards; Geoff Hebbard; Paul E O'Brien
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 4.129

4.  The time course and persistence of "concurrent contraction" during normal peristalsis.

Authors:  John E Pandolfino; Zhiyue Lin; Sabine Roman; Peter J Kahrilas
Journal:  Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol       Date:  2011-07-28       Impact factor: 4.052

Review 5.  High-resolution manometry for the evaluation of gastric motility.

Authors:  Fernando Augusto Mardiros Herbella; Lilian R O Aprile; Marco G Patti
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2014-08-09

6.  Flow time through esophagogastric junction derived during high-resolution impedance-manometry studies: a novel parameter for assessing esophageal bolus transit.

Authors:  Zhiyue Lin; Hala Imam; Frèdèric Nicodème; Dustin A Carlson; Chen-Yuan Lin; Brandon Yim; Peter J Kahrilas; John E Pandolfino
Journal:  Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol       Date:  2014-05-22       Impact factor: 4.052

Review 7.  High-resolution anorectal manometry: An expensive hobby or worth every penny?

Authors:  G Basilisco; A E Bharucha
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 3.598

8.  Criteria for assessing esophageal motility in laparoscopic adjustable gastric band patients: the importance of the lower esophageal contractile segment.

Authors:  Paul Robert Burton; Wendy A Brown; Cheryl Laurie; Geoff Hebbard; Paul E O'Brien
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2009-12-12       Impact factor: 4.129

9.  The value of high-resolution manometry in the assessment of the resting characteristics of the lower esophageal sphincter.

Authors:  Shahin Ayazi; Jeffrey A Hagen; Joerg Zehetner; Oliver Ross; Calvin Wu; Arzu Oezcelik; Emmanuele Abate; Helen J Sohn; Farzaneh Banki; John C Lipham; Steven R DeMeester; Tom R Demeester
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2009-09-25       Impact factor: 3.452

10.  Esophageal pressure topography criteria indicative of incomplete bolus clearance: a study using high-resolution impedance manometry.

Authors:  William J Bulsiewicz; Peter J Kahrilas; Monika A Kwiatek; Sudip K Ghosh; Albert Meek; John E Pandolfino
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-08-18       Impact factor: 10.864

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.