Literature DB >> 19690527

Esophageal pressure topography criteria indicative of incomplete bolus clearance: a study using high-resolution impedance manometry.

William J Bulsiewicz1, Peter J Kahrilas, Monika A Kwiatek, Sudip K Ghosh, Albert Meek, John E Pandolfino.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study used high-resolution impedance manometry (HRIM) to determine pressure topography thresholds of peristaltic integrity predictive of incomplete esophageal bolus clearance.
METHODS: A total of 16 normal controls and 8 patients with dysphagia were studied using a solid-state HRIM assembly incorporating 36 manometric sensors and 12 impedance segments. Each of the 10 saline swallows in each study was dichotomously scored as either complete or incomplete bolus clearance by impedance criteria, and peristaltic integrity was evaluated using pressure topography isobaric contours ranging from 10 to 30 mm Hg in 5- mm Hg increments. Each isobaric contour plot was characterized by the location and length of breaks in the isobaric contour.
RESULTS: All subjects had normal esophagogastric junction (EGJ) relaxation and none met the pressure topography criteria of hiatus hernia. In all, 70 (29%) of the 240 individual swallows had incomplete bolus clearance. In every case, an intact >or=20 mm Hg isobaric contour was associated with complete bolus clearance. The largest defect in the 20 and 30 mm Hg isobaric contours associated with complete bolus clearance measured 1.7 and 3.0 cm, respectively, in length, whereas the smallest defect predictive of incomplete bolus clearance measured 2.1 and 3.2 cm, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: In individuals with normal EGJ relaxation and morphology, peristaltic contractions with breaks <2 cm in the 20 mm Hg isobaric contour or <3 cm in the 30 mm Hg isobaric contour are associated with complete bolus clearance, and longer breaks predict incomplete bolus clearance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19690527      PMCID: PMC2886600          DOI: 10.1038/ajg.2009.467

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0002-9270            Impact factor:   10.864


  17 in total

1.  Multichannel intraluminal impedance monitoring in the evaluation of patients with non-obstructive Dysphagia.

Authors:  José M Conchillo; Nam Q Nguyen; Melvin Samsom; Richard H Holloway; André J P M Smout
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 10.864

2.  High-resolution manometry predicts the success of oesophageal bolus transport and identifies clinically important abnormalities not detected by conventional manometry.

Authors:  M Fox; G Hebbard; P Janiak; J G Brasseur; S Ghosh; M Thumshirn; M Fried; W Schwizer
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 3.598

3.  Effect of peristaltic dysfunction on esophageal volume clearance.

Authors:  P J Kahrilas; W J Dodds; W J Hogan
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 22.682

Review 4.  Classification of oesophageal motility abnormalities.

Authors:  S J Spechler; D O Castell
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 23.059

5.  Determinants of intrabolus pressure during esophageal peristaltic bolus transport.

Authors:  J Ren; B T Massey; W J Dodds; M K Kern; J G Brasseur; R Shaker; S S Harrington; W J Hogan; R C Arndorfer
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1993-03

6.  Ineffective esophageal motility (IEM): the primary finding in patients with nonspecific esophageal motility disorder.

Authors:  L P Leite; B T Johnston; J Barrett; J A Castell; D O Castell
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 3.199

7.  Oesophageal peristaltic transition zone defects: real but few and far between.

Authors:  S K Ghosh; J E Pandolfino; M A Kwiatek; P J Kahrilas
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2008-07-25       Impact factor: 3.598

Review 8.  Gastro-oesophageal reflux monitoring: review and consensus report on detection and definitions of acid, non-acid, and gas reflux.

Authors:  D Sifrim; D Castell; J Dent; P J Kahrilas
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 23.059

9.  Clarification of the esophageal function defect in patients with manometric ineffective esophageal motility: studies using combined impedance-manometry.

Authors:  Radu Tutuian; Donald O Castell
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 11.382

10.  Impairment of esophageal emptying with hiatal hernia.

Authors:  S Sloan; P J Kahrilas
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 22.682

View more
  37 in total

1.  Weak peristalsis in esophageal pressure topography: classification and association with Dysphagia.

Authors:  Sabine Roman; Zhiyue Lin; Monika A Kwiatek; John E Pandolfino; Peter J Kahrilas
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-10-05       Impact factor: 10.864

Review 2.  Impedance as an adjunct to manometric testing to investigate symptoms of dysphagia: What it has failed to do and what it may tell us in the future.

Authors:  T Omari; J Tack; N Rommel
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 4.623

3.  High-resolution manometry: is it better for detecting esophageal disease?

Authors:  John E Pandolfino
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y)       Date:  2010-10

4.  Interobserver variability in esophageal body measurements with high-resolution manometry among new physician users.

Authors:  Erick Raj Singh; Christopher Rife; Steven Clayton; Peter Naas; Paul Nietert; Donald O Castell
Journal:  J Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 3.062

Review 5.  Gastroesophageal reflux and altered motility in lung transplant rejection.

Authors:  J M Castor; R K Wood; A J Muir; S M Palmer; R A Shimpi
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2010-05-26       Impact factor: 3.598

6.  Distal contraction latency: a measure of propagation velocity optimized for esophageal pressure topography studies.

Authors:  Sabine Roman; Zhiyue Lin; John E Pandolfino; Peter J Kahrilas
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-10-26       Impact factor: 10.864

Review 7.  Evaluation of esophageal motor disorders in the era of high-resolution manometry and intraluminal impedance.

Authors:  John E Pandolfino; William J Bulsiewicz
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2009-06

8.  Use of Esophageal pH Monitoring to Minimize Proton-Pump Inhibitor Utilization in Patients with Gastroesophageal Reflux Symptoms.

Authors:  George Triadafilopoulos; Thomas Zikos; Kirsten Regalia; Irene Sonu; Nielsen Q Fernandez-Becker; Linda Nguyen; Monica Christine R Nandwani; John O Clarke
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2018-06-29       Impact factor: 3.199

9.  Treatment of esophageal motility disorders based on the chicago classification.

Authors:  Carla Maradey-Romero; Scott Gabbard; Ronnie Fass
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-12

10.  Treatment implications of high-resolution manometry findings: options for patients with esophageal dysmotility.

Authors:  Ahmed Bolkhir; C Prakash Gyawali
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.