Literature DB >> 22628033

Adding a radial dimension to the assessment of esophagogastric junction relaxation: validation studies of the 3D-eSleeve.

Frédéric Nicodème1, John E Pandolfino, Zhiyue Lin, Yinglian Xiao, Gabriela Escobar, Peter J Kahrilas.   

Abstract

High-resolution manometry (HRM) with esophageal pressure topography (EPT) allowed for the establishment of an objective quantitative measurement of esophagogastric junction (EGJ) relaxation, the integrated relaxation pressure (IRP). This study assessed whether or not a novel 3D-HRM assembly could improve on this measurement. Twenty-five normal subjects were studied with both a standard HRM assembly and a novel hybrid assembly (3D-HRM), including a 9.0 cm 3D-HRM segment composed of 96 radially dispersed independent pressure sensors. The standard IRP was computed using each assembly and compared with a novel paradigm, the 3D-IRP, an analysis premised on finding the axial maximum and radial minimum pressure at each sensor ring along the sleeve segment. Fourteen additional subjects underwent barium swallows with 3D-HRM and concurrent videofluoroscopy to compare the electronic sleeve (eSleeve) paradigm (circumferential average) to the 3D eSleeve paradigm (radial minimum) as a predictor of transphincteric flow. The 3D-IRP was significantly less than all other calculations of IRP with the upper limit of normal being 12 mmHg vs. 17 mmHg for the standard IRP. The sensitivity (0.78) and the specificity (0.88) of the 3D-eSleeve were also better than the standard eSleeve (0.55 and 0.85, respectively) for predicting flow permissive time verified fluoroscopically. The 3D-IRP and 3D-eSleeve calculated using the radial pressure minimum lowered the normative range of EGJ relaxation (upper limit of normal 12 mmHg) and yielded intraluminal pressure gradients that better correlated with bolus flow than did analysis paradigms based on circumferentially averaged pressure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22628033      PMCID: PMC3423108          DOI: 10.1152/ajpgi.00063.2012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol        ISSN: 0193-1857            Impact factor:   4.052


  8 in total

1.  Pressure morphology of the relaxed lower esophageal sphincter: the formation and collapse of the phrenic ampulla.

Authors:  Monika A Kwiatek; Frédéric Nicodème; John E Pandolfino; Peter J Kahrilas
Journal:  Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol       Date:  2011-11-23       Impact factor: 4.052

2.  Utilizing intraluminal pressure differences to predict esophageal bolus flow dynamics.

Authors:  Sudip K Ghosh; Peter J Kahrilas; Nilesh Lodhia; John E Pandolfino
Journal:  Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol       Date:  2007-09-13       Impact factor: 4.052

3.  Topography of the esophageal peristaltic pressure wave.

Authors:  R E Clouse; A Staiano
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1991-10

4.  Three-dimensional imaging of the lower esophageal sphincter in gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  H J Stein; T R DeMeester; R Naspetti; J Jamieson; R E Perry
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Development of a topographic analysis system for manometric studies in the gastrointestinal tract.

Authors:  R E Clouse; A Staiano; A Alrakawi
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 9.427

6.  3D-high resolution manometry of the esophagogastric junction.

Authors:  M A Kwiatek; J E Pandolfino; P J Kahrilas
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2011-05-20       Impact factor: 3.598

7.  Utilizing intraluminal pressure gradients to predict esophageal clearance: a validation study.

Authors:  John E Pandolfino; Sudip K Ghosh; Nilesh Lodhia; Peter J Kahrilas
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-07-12       Impact factor: 10.864

8.  Impaired deglutitive EGJ relaxation in clinical esophageal manometry: a quantitative analysis of 400 patients and 75 controls.

Authors:  Sudip K Ghosh; John E Pandolfino; John Rice; John O Clarke; Monika Kwiatek; Peter J Kahrilas
Journal:  Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol       Date:  2007-08-09       Impact factor: 4.052

  8 in total
  13 in total

Review 1.  Impedance as an adjunct to manometric testing to investigate symptoms of dysphagia: What it has failed to do and what it may tell us in the future.

Authors:  T Omari; J Tack; N Rommel
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 4.623

2.  Interrogation of esophagogastric junction barrier function using the esophagogastric junction contractile integral: an observational cohort study.

Authors:  P Gor; Y Li; S Munigala; A Patel; A Bolkhir; C P Gyawali
Journal:  Dis Esophagus       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 3.429

3.  A multisensor approach to improve manometric analysis of the upper esophageal sphincter.

Authors:  Corinne A Jones; Michelle R Ciucci; Michael J Hammer; Timothy M McCulloch
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2015-08-22       Impact factor: 3.325

4.  Pharyngeal swallowing pressures in the base-of-tongue and hypopharynx regions identified with three-dimensional manometry.

Authors:  Sarah P Rosen; Corinne A Jones; Timothy M McCulloch
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2017-02-19       Impact factor: 3.325

Review 5.  Oesophageal dysphagia: manifestations and diagnosis.

Authors:  Frank Zerbib; Taher Omari
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2014-11-18       Impact factor: 46.802

Review 6.  Expert consensus document: Advances in the physiological assessment and diagnosis of GERD.

Authors:  Edoardo Savarino; Albert J Bredenoord; Mark Fox; John E Pandolfino; Sabine Roman; C Prakash Gyawali
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2017-09-27       Impact factor: 46.802

7.  Novel 3D high-resolution manometry metrics for quantifying esophagogastric junction contractility.

Authors:  Zhiyue Lin; Yinglian Xiao; Yuwen Li; John E Pandolfino; Minhu Chen; Peter J Kahrilas
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2017-04-05       Impact factor: 3.598

8.  [Modern diagnostic tools for esophageal pathologies].

Authors:  A Kandulski; P Malfertheiner; J Weigt
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 0.743

9.  Three-Dimensional High-Resolution Esophageal Manometry Study of the Esophagogastric Junction in Patients with Achalasia.

Authors:  Marie-Anne Guillaumot; Chloé Léandri; Sarah Leblanc; Romain Coriat; Frédéric Prat; Stanislas Chaussade; Maximilien Barret
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2019-09-20       Impact factor: 3.199

10.  Calculation of esophagogastric junction vector volume using three-dimensional high-resolution manometry.

Authors:  F Nicodème; N J Soper; Z Lin; J E Pandolfino; P J Kahrilas
Journal:  Dis Esophagus       Date:  2014-08-01       Impact factor: 3.429

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.