Literature DB >> 20012706

Criteria for assessing esophageal motility in laparoscopic adjustable gastric band patients: the importance of the lower esophageal contractile segment.

Paul Robert Burton1, Wendy A Brown, Cheryl Laurie, Geoff Hebbard, Paul E O'Brien.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Esophageal function appears critical in laparoscopic adjustable gastric band (LAGB) patients; however, conventional motility assessments have not proven to be clinically useful. Recent combined video fluoroscopic and high-resolution manometric studies have identified important components of esophageal function in LAGB patients.
METHODS: Successful and symptomatic LAGB patients, with normal or mildly impaired esophageal peristalsis, underwent a standardized, water swallow, high-resolution manometry protocol designed specifically to assess the lower esophageal contractile segment (LECS), in combination with conventional measures of esophageal motility. Differences in response to changes in LAGB volume were assessed.
RESULTS: There were 101 symptomatic and 29 successful patients. More symptomatic patients had a mild impairment in esophageal motility (39.6% vs. 3.4%, p < 0.005). Successful patients demonstrated an intact LECS during normal swallows more frequently than symptomatic patients (95% vs. 43%, p < 0.005). Absolute intraluminal pressures were not different between the groups. Removing all fluid from the LAGB revealed more hypotensive swallows in the symptomatic patients (30% vs. 17%, p = 0.002), an effect not observed when the LAGB volume was increased (8% vs. 5%, p = 0.21). Receiver operator characteristic analysis determined that an intact LECS in 70% of normal swallows defined normal motility in LAGB patients.
CONCLUSIONS: The LECS is a valuable measure of esophageal function in LAGB patients and complements conventional manometric criteria. Symptomatic patients have less normal swallows; however, these also frequently demonstrate a deficient LECS. Further information can be elucidated by performing swallows at differing LAGB volumes. High-resolution manometry, using these adapted criteria, is now a useful in the investigation in symptomatic LAGB patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20012706     DOI: 10.1007/s11695-009-0043-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obes Surg        ISSN: 0960-8923            Impact factor:   4.129


  25 in total

1.  Regional differences in the response of feline esophageal smooth muscle to stretch and cholinergic stimulation.

Authors:  A Muinuddin; S Xue; N E Diamant
Journal:  Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 4.052

Review 2.  Challenging the limits of esophageal manometry.

Authors:  Peter J Kahrilas; Sudip K Ghosh; John E Pandolfino
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 22.682

3.  Effect of laparoscopic gastric banding on esophageal motility.

Authors:  J R de Jong; B van Ramshorst; R Timmer; H G Gooszen; A J P M Smout
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 4.129

4.  Mechanical properties of isolated human esophageal smooth muscle.

Authors:  A Tøttrup; A Forman; N Uldbjerg; P Funch-Jensen; K E Andersson
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1990-03

5.  Pathophysiology of laparoscopic adjustable gastric bands: analysis and classification using high-resolution video manometry and a stress barium protocol.

Authors:  Paul Robert Burton; Wendy A Brown; Cheryl Laurie; Anna Korin; Kenneth Yap; Melissa Richards; John Owens; Gary Crosthwaite; Geoff Hebbard; Paul E O'Brien
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2009-09-18       Impact factor: 4.129

6.  The effect of laparoscopic adjustable gastric bands on esophageal motility and the gastroesophageal junction: analysis using high-resolution video manometry.

Authors:  Paul R Burton; Wendy Brown; Cheryl Laurie; Melissa Richards; Sohail Afkari; Kenneth Yap; Anna Korin; Geoff Hebbard; Paul E O'Brien
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2009-05-08       Impact factor: 4.129

Review 7.  Esophageal motility disorders in terms of pressure topography: the Chicago Classification.

Authors:  Peter J Kahrilas; Sudip K Ghosh; John E Pandolfino
Journal:  J Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  2008 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.062

8.  Clarification of the esophageal function defect in patients with manometric ineffective esophageal motility: studies using combined impedance-manometry.

Authors:  Radu Tutuian; Donald O Castell
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 11.382

9.  Utilizing intraluminal pressure gradients to predict esophageal clearance: a validation study.

Authors:  John E Pandolfino; Sudip K Ghosh; Nilesh Lodhia; Peter J Kahrilas
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-07-12       Impact factor: 10.864

10.  The gastric band: first-choice procedure for obesity surgery.

Authors:  Franco Favretti; David Ashton; Luca Busetto; Gianni Segato; Maurizio De Luca
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 3.352

View more
  9 in total

1.  Should the lap band be removed to treat pseudoachalasia?

Authors:  George A Fielding
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y)       Date:  2013-07

2.  The Long-Term Effects of the Adjustable Gastric Band on Esophageal Motility in Patients Who Present for Band Removal.

Authors:  Loic Tchokouani; Anusha Jayaram; Naif Alenazi; Gustavo Fernandez Ranvier; Gina Sam; Subhash Kini
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 4.129

3.  Long-Term Manometric Impact of the Adjustable Gastric Band on Esophageal Motility: a Prospective Case-Control Study.

Authors:  Dimitrios Schizas; Nikolaos Michalopoulos; Tania Triantafyllou; Malvina Maria Eleftheriou; Charalampos Theodoropoulos; Fotios Archontovasilis; Dimitrios Theodorou
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2021-03-26       Impact factor: 4.129

4.  The Physiology and Pathophysiology of Gastroesophageal Reflux in Patients with Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Band.

Authors:  Richard Y Chen; Paul R Burton; Geraldine J Ooi; Cheryl Laurie; Andrew I Smith; Gary Crosthwaite; Paul E O'Brien; Geoff Hebbard; Peter D Nottle; Wendy A Brown
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 4.129

5.  Achalasia-like disorder after laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding: a reversible side effect?

Authors:  M Robert; N Golse; P Espalieu; G Poncet; F Mion; S Roman; J Boulez; C Gouillat
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 4.129

6.  Predicting outcomes of intermediate term complications and revisional surgery following laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding: utility of the CORE classification and Melbourne motility criteria.

Authors:  Paul Robert Burton; Wendy A Brown; Cheryl Laurie; Geoff Hebbard; Paul E O'Brien
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 4.129

Review 7.  The Effects of Bariatric Surgery and Endoscopic Bariatric Therapies on GERD: An Update.

Authors:  Mohamad I Itani; Jad Farha; Mohamad Kareem Marrache; Lea Fayad; Dilhana Badurdeen; Vivek Kumbhari
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-01-20

Review 8.  Clinical applications of esophageal impedance monitoring and high-resolution manometry.

Authors:  Boudewijn F Kessing; André J P M Smout; Albert J Bredenoord
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2012-06

9.  High-resolution Manometry: Esophageal Disorders Not Addressed by the "Chicago Classification".

Authors:  Yu Tien Wang; Etsuro Yazaki; Daniel Sifrim
Journal:  J Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2012-10-09       Impact factor: 4.924

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.