Literature DB >> 24852565

Flow time through esophagogastric junction derived during high-resolution impedance-manometry studies: a novel parameter for assessing esophageal bolus transit.

Zhiyue Lin1, Hala Imam2, Frèdèric Nicodème3, Dustin A Carlson1, Chen-Yuan Lin1, Brandon Yim1, Peter J Kahrilas1, John E Pandolfino4.   

Abstract

This study aimed to develop and validate a method to measure bolus flow time (BFT) through the esophagogastric junction (EGJ) using a high-resolution impedance-manometry (HRIM) sleeve. Ten healthy subjects were studied with concurrent HRIM and videofluoroscopy; another 15 controls were studied with HRIM alone. HRIM studies were performed using a 4.2-mm-outer diameter assembly with 36 pressure sensors at 1-cm intervals and 18 impedance segments at 2-cm intervals (Given Imaging, Los Angeles, CA). HRIM and fluoroscopic data from four barium swallows, two in the supine and two in the upright position, were analyzed to create a customized MATLAB program to calculate BFT using a HRIM sleeve comprising three sensors positioned at the crural diaphragm. Bolus transit through the EGJ measured during blinded review of fluoroscopy was almost identical to BFT calculated with the HRIM sleeve, with the nadir impedance deflection point used as the signature of bolus presence. Good correlation existed between videofluoroscopy for measurement of upper sphincter relaxation to beginning of flow [R = 0.97, P < 0.001 (supine) and R = 0.77, P < 0.01 (upright)] and time to end of flow [R = 0.95, P < 0.001 (supine) and R = 0.82, P < 0.01 (upright)]. The medians and interquartile ranges (IQR) of flow time though the EGJ in 15 healthy subjects calculated using the virtual sleeve were 3.5 s (IQR 2.3-3.9 s) in the supine position and 3.2 s (IQR 2.3-3.6 s) in the upright position. BFT is a new metric that provides important information about bolus transit through the EGJ. An assessment of BFT will determine when the EGJ is open and will also provide a useful method to accurately assess trans-EGJ pressure gradients during flow.
Copyright © 2014 the American Physiological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bolus transit; impedance; manometry

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24852565      PMCID: PMC4101677          DOI: 10.1152/ajpgi.00119.2014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol        ISSN: 0193-1857            Impact factor:   4.052


  16 in total

1.  Measuring EGJ opening patterns using high resolution intraluminal impedance.

Authors:  J E Pandolfino; G Shi; Q Zhang; S Ghosh; J G Brasseur; P J Kahrilas
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 3.598

2.  Assessment of intraluminal impedance for the detection of pharyngeal bolus flow during swallowing in healthy adults.

Authors:  Taher I Omari; Nathalie Rommel; Michal M Szczesniak; Sergio Fuentealba; Philip G Dinning; Geoffrey P Davidson; Ian J Cook
Journal:  Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol       Date:  2005-09-01       Impact factor: 4.052

3.  A unique esophageal motor pattern that involves longitudinal muscles is responsible for emptying in achalasia esophagus.

Authors:  Su Jin Hong; Valmik Bhargava; Yanfen Jiang; Debbie Denboer; Ravinder K Mittal
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2010-04-08       Impact factor: 22.682

4.  Influence of breathing pattern on the esophagogastric junction pressure and esophageal transit.

Authors:  R K Mittal; H A Shaffer; S Parollisi; L Baggett
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1995-10

5.  1976 Walter B. Cannon Lecture: current concepts of esophageal motor function: clinical implications for radiology.

Authors:  W J Dodds
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1977-04       Impact factor: 3.959

6.  Bolus transit patterns in healthy subjects: a study using simultaneous impedance monitoring, videoesophagram, and esophageal manometry.

Authors:  Hala Imam; Steven Shay; Aman Ali; Mark Baker
Journal:  Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 4.052

7.  Esophageal function testing using multichannel intraluminal impedance.

Authors:  R Srinivasan; M F Vela; P O Katz; R Tutuian; J A Castell; D O Castell
Journal:  Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 4.052

Review 8.  Gastro-oesophageal reflux monitoring: review and consensus report on detection and definitions of acid, non-acid, and gas reflux.

Authors:  D Sifrim; D Castell; J Dent; P J Kahrilas
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 23.059

9.  Measuring esophageal motility with a new intraluminal impedance device. First clinical results in reflux patients.

Authors:  J Fass; J Silny; J Braun; U Heindrichs; B Dreuw; V Schumpelick; G Rau
Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 2.423

10.  Utilizing intraluminal pressure gradients to predict esophageal clearance: a validation study.

Authors:  John E Pandolfino; Sudip K Ghosh; Nilesh Lodhia; Peter J Kahrilas
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-07-12       Impact factor: 10.864

View more
  27 in total

Review 1.  Impedance as an adjunct to manometric testing to investigate symptoms of dysphagia: What it has failed to do and what it may tell us in the future.

Authors:  T Omari; J Tack; N Rommel
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 4.623

Review 2.  Expert consensus document: Advances in the management of oesophageal motility disorders in the era of high-resolution manometry: a focus on achalasia syndromes.

Authors:  Peter J Kahrilas; Albert J Bredenoord; Mark Fox; C Prakash Gyawali; Sabine Roman; André J P M Smout; John E Pandolfino
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2017-09-27       Impact factor: 46.802

Review 3.  Treatments for achalasia in 2017: how to choose among them.

Authors:  Peter J Kahrilas; John E Pandolfino
Journal:  Curr Opin Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 3.287

Review 4.  High-resolution esophageal manometry: interpretation in clinical practice.

Authors:  Rena Yadlapati
Journal:  Curr Opin Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 3.287

Review 5.  How to Optimally Apply Impedance in the Evaluation of Esophageal Dysmotility.

Authors:  Amit Patel; C Prakash Gyawali
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2016-11

Review 6.  An ANMS-NASPGHAN consensus document on esophageal and antroduodenal manometry in children.

Authors:  R Rosen; J M Garza; N Tipnis; S Nurko
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2017-11-27       Impact factor: 3.598

7.  High-resolution impedance manometry parameters enhance the esophageal motility evaluation in non-obstructive dysphagia patients without a major Chicago Classification motility disorder.

Authors:  D A Carlson; T Omari; Z Lin; N Rommel; K Starkey; P J Kahrilas; J Tack; J E Pandolfino
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2016-09-20       Impact factor: 3.598

Review 8.  Oesophageal dysphagia: manifestations and diagnosis.

Authors:  Frank Zerbib; Taher Omari
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2014-11-18       Impact factor: 46.802

9.  High-resolution Impedance Manometry after Sleeve Gastrectomy: Increased Intragastric Pressure and Reflux are Frequent Events.

Authors:  François Mion; Salvatore Tolone; Aurélien Garros; Edoardo Savarino; Elise Pelascini; Maud Robert; Gilles Poncet; Pierre-Jean Valette; Sophie Marjoux; Ludovico Docimo; Sabine Roman
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 4.129

10.  High-Resolution Impedance Manometry Metrics of the Esophagogastric Junction for the Assessment of Treatment Response in Achalasia.

Authors:  Dustin A Carlson; Zhiyue Lin; Peter J Kahrilas; Joel Sternbach; Eric S Hungness; Nathaniel J Soper; Michelle Balla; Zoe Listernick; Michael Tye; Katherine Ritter; Jenna Craft; Jody D Ciolino; John E Pandolfino
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-10-04       Impact factor: 10.864

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.