Literature DB >> 8460696

Determinants of intrabolus pressure during esophageal peristaltic bolus transport.

J Ren1, B T Massey, W J Dodds, M K Kern, J G Brasseur, R Shaker, S S Harrington, W J Hogan, R C Arndorfer.   

Abstract

Previous manometric studies of esophageal fluid bolus transport in humans have generally ignored the hydrodynamic distinction between intrabolus pressure and pressure within the lumen-occluded, contracting esophageal segment. In this study we obtained concurrent esophageal videofluoroscopic and intraluminal manometric recordings in supine normal volunteers using different bolus volumes and viscosities and abdominal compression. Intrabolus pressure increased with bolus volume, viscosity, and abdominal compression. Esophageal diameter increased with larger bolus volumes, and this increase was correlated with increases in intrabolus pressure. Intrabolus pressure was highest in the bolus tail. Peak intraluminal pressures > 20 mmHg above basal intrabolus pressure almost invariably were associated with effective peristalsis, whereas values of this pressure differential < 20 mmHg frequently were associated with ineffective peristalsis and retrograde bolus escape. Intrabolus pressure can serve as an important indicator of the forces resisting peristaltic transport and the occurrence of ineffective bolus transport.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8460696     DOI: 10.1152/ajpgi.1993.264.3.G407

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Physiol        ISSN: 0002-9513


  24 in total

Review 1.  The zero-stress state of the gastrointestinal tract: biomechanical and functional implications.

Authors:  H Gregersen; G S Kassab; Y C Fung
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 3.199

2.  Patients with esophageal motility disorders show distinct patterns based on axial force measurements.

Authors:  F H Lundager; J Tack; K Blondeau; A M Drewes; H Gregersen
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2012-06-06       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 3.  Pathophysiological mechanisms of gastroesophageal reflux disease in children.

Authors:  G P Davidson; T I Omari
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2001-06

Review 4.  Finite element simulation of food transport through the esophageal body.

Authors:  Wei Yang; Tat Ching Fung; Kerm Sim Chian; Chuh Khiun Chong
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-03-07       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 5.  Evaluation of esophageal motor disorders in the era of high-resolution manometry and intraluminal impedance.

Authors:  John E Pandolfino; William J Bulsiewicz
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2009-06

6.  Characteristics of the propagating pressure wave in the esophagus.

Authors:  R E Clouse; A Staiano; S J Bickston; S M Cohn
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 3.199

7.  Spatial patterns of fasting and fed antropyloric pressure waves in humans.

Authors:  W M Sun; G S Hebbard; C H Malbert; K L Jones; S Doran; M Horowitz; J Dent
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1997-09-01       Impact factor: 5.182

8.  Oesophageal pressure-flow metrics in relation to bolus volume, bolus consistency, and bolus perception.

Authors:  Taher I Omari; Lucas Wauters; Nathalie Rommel; Stamatiki Kritas; Jenifer C Myers
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 4.623

9.  Pharyngeal Pressure and Timing During Bolus Transit.

Authors:  Chelsea C Walczak; Corinne A Jones; Timothy M McCulloch
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2016-08-26       Impact factor: 3.438

10.  Esophageal contractions in type 3 achalasia esophagus: simultaneous or peristaltic?

Authors:  Tae Ho Kim; Nirali Patel; Melissa Ledgerwood-Lee; Ravinder K Mittal
Journal:  Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol       Date:  2016-02-25       Impact factor: 4.052

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.