Literature DB >> 21799184

The time course and persistence of "concurrent contraction" during normal peristalsis.

John E Pandolfino1, Zhiyue Lin, Sabine Roman, Peter J Kahrilas.   

Abstract

Whereas conventional manometry depicts peristalsis as pressure variation over time, high-resolution manometry makes it equally feasible to depict pressure variation along the lumen (spatial pressure variation plots). This study analyzed the characteristics of spatial pressure variation plots during normal peristalsis. High-resolution manometry studies of 72 normal subjects were analyzed with custom MATLAB programs. A coordinate-based strategy was used to normalize both timing of peristalsis and esophageal length. A spatial pressure variation function was devised to localize the proximal (P) and the distal troughs (D) on each subject's composite pressure topography and track the length within the P-D segment contracting concurrently in the course of peristalsis. The timing at which this function peaked was compared with that of the contractile deceleration point (CDP). The length of concurrent contraction during normal peristalsis had an average span of 9.3 cm, encompassing 61% of the distal P-D length of the esophagus. The timing of the CDP position closely matched that of maximal length within the P-D segment contracting concurrently (r = 0.90, P < 0.001). The pressure morphology of the maximal concurrent contraction was that of a smooth curve, and it was extremely rare to see multiple peaks along the vertical axis (seen in 4 of 72 subjects). Concurrent contraction involving ∼60% of the P-D span occurred with normal peristalsis. The segment of concurrent contraction progressively increased as peristalsis progressed, peaked at the CDP, and then progressively decreased. How abnormalities of the extent or timing of concurrent contraction relate to clinical syndromes requires further investigation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21799184      PMCID: PMC3191553          DOI: 10.1152/ajpgi.00214.2011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol        ISSN: 0193-1857            Impact factor:   4.052


  16 in total

1.  High-resolution manometry predicts the success of oesophageal bolus transport and identifies clinically important abnormalities not detected by conventional manometry.

Authors:  M Fox; G Hebbard; P Janiak; J G Brasseur; S Ghosh; M Thumshirn; M Fried; W Schwizer
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 3.598

2.  Transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxations and reflux: mechanistic analysis using concurrent fluoroscopy and high-resolution manometry.

Authors:  John E Pandolfino; Qing G Zhang; Sudip K Ghosh; Alexander Han; Christopher Boniquit; Peter J Kahrilas
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2006-09-08       Impact factor: 22.682

3.  Utilizing intraluminal pressure differences to predict esophageal bolus flow dynamics.

Authors:  Sudip K Ghosh; Peter J Kahrilas; Nilesh Lodhia; John E Pandolfino
Journal:  Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol       Date:  2007-09-13       Impact factor: 4.052

4.  Distal esophageal spasm in high-resolution esophageal pressure topography: defining clinical phenotypes.

Authors:  John E Pandolfino; Sabine Roman; Dustin Carlson; Daniel Luger; Kiran Bidari; Lubomyr Boris; Monika A Kwiatek; Peter J Kahrilas
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2011-05-06       Impact factor: 22.682

5.  Topography of normal and high-amplitude esophageal peristalsis.

Authors:  R E Clouse; A Staiano
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1993-12

6.  Pathogenesis of simultaneous esophageal contractions in patients with motility disorders.

Authors:  J Behar; P Biancani
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 22.682

7.  Abnormal esophageal motility. An analysis of concurrent radiographic and manometric findings.

Authors:  B T Massey; W J Dodds; W J Hogan; J G Brasseur; J F Helm
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 22.682

8.  The mechanical basis of impaired esophageal emptying postfundoplication.

Authors:  Sudip K Ghosh; Peter J Kahrilas; Tamer Zaki; John E Pandolfino; Raymond J Joehl; James G Brasseur
Journal:  Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol       Date:  2005-02-03       Impact factor: 4.052

Review 9.  Esophageal motility disorders in terms of pressure topography: the Chicago Classification.

Authors:  Peter J Kahrilas; Sudip K Ghosh; John E Pandolfino
Journal:  J Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  2008 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.062

10.  Classifying esophageal motility by pressure topography characteristics: a study of 400 patients and 75 controls.

Authors:  John E Pandolfino; Sudip K Ghosh; John Rice; John O Clarke; Monika A Kwiatek; Peter J Kahrilas
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-09-26       Impact factor: 10.864

View more
  1 in total

1.  Localizing the contractile deceleration point (CDP) in patients with abnormal esophageal pressure topography.

Authors:  Z Lin; J E Pandolfino; Y Xiao; D Carlson; K Bidari; G Escobar; P J Kahrilas
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2012-06-24       Impact factor: 3.598

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.