Literature DB >> 17004471

Detection and F0 discrimination of harmonic complex tones in the presence of competing tones or noise.

Christophe Micheyl1, Joshua G W Bernstein, Andrew J Oxenham.   

Abstract

Normal-hearing listeners' ability to "hear out" the pitch of a target harmonic complex tone (HCT) was tested with simultaneous HCT or noise maskers, all bandpass-filtered into the same spectral region (1200-3600 Hz). Target-to-masker ratios (TMRs) necessary to discriminate fixed fundamental-frequency (F0) differences were measured for target F0s between 100 and 400 Hz. At high F0s (400 Hz), asynchronous gating of masker and signal, presenting the masker in a different F0 range, and reducing the F0 rove of the masker, all resulted in improved performance. At the low F0s (100 Hz), none of these manipulations improved performance significantly. The findings are generally consistent with the idea that the ability to segregate sounds based on cues such as F0 differences and onset/offset asynchronies can be strongly limited by peripheral harmonic resolvability. However, some cases were observed where perceptual segregation appeared possible, even when no peripherally resolved harmonics were present in the mixture of target and masker. A final experiment, comparing TMRs necessary for detection and F0 discrimination, showed that F0 discrimination of the target was possible with noise maskers at only a few decibels above detection threshold, whereas similar performance with HCT maskers was only possible 15-25 dB above detection threshold.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17004471     DOI: 10.1121/1.2221396

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  19 in total

1.  Spectral processing of two concurrent harmonic complexes.

Authors:  Yi Shen; Virginia M Richards
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Pitch perception for mixtures of spectrally overlapping harmonic complex tones.

Authors:  Christophe Micheyl; Michael V Keebler; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Musical intervals and relative pitch: frequency resolution, not interval resolution, is special.

Authors:  Josh H McDermott; Michael V Keebler; Christophe Micheyl; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Spatial release from masking with noise-vocoded speech.

Authors:  Richard L Freyman; Uma Balakrishnan; Karen S Helfer
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Harmonic segregation through mistuning can improve fundamental frequency discrimination.

Authors:  Joshua G W Bernstein; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Responses of cochlear nucleus neurons to harmonic and mistuned complex tones.

Authors:  Donal G Sinex
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2007-11-13       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  Age-Related Changes in Processing Simultaneous Amplitude Modulated Sounds Assessed Using Envelope Following Responses.

Authors:  Aravindakshan Parthasarathy; Jesyin Lai; Edward L Bartlett
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2016-02-23

8.  Responses in the inferior colliculus of the guinea pig to concurrent harmonic series and the effect of inactivation of descending controls.

Authors:  Kyle T Nakamoto; Trevor M Shackleton; Alan R Palmer
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-02-10       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Pitch discrimination with mixtures of three concurrent harmonic complexes.

Authors:  Jackson E Graves; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Masking release for low- and high-pass-filtered speech in the presence of noise and single-talker interference.

Authors:  Andrew J Oxenham; Andrea M Simonson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 1.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.