Literature DB >> 25002128

Computational model predictions of cues for concurrent vowel identification.

Ananthakrishna Chintanpalli1, Jayne B Ahlstrom, Judy R Dubno.   

Abstract

Although differences in fundamental frequencies (F0s) between vowels are beneficial for their segregation and identification, listeners can still segregate and identify simultaneous vowels that have identical F0s, suggesting that additional cues are contributing, including formant frequency differences. The current perception and computational modeling study was designed to assess the contribution of F0 and formant difference cues for concurrent vowel identification. Younger adults with normal hearing listened to concurrent vowels over a wide range of levels (25-85 dB SPL) for conditions in which F0 was the same or different between vowel pairs. Vowel identification scores were poorer at the lowest and highest levels for each F0 condition, and F0 benefit was reduced at the lowest level as compared to higher levels. To understand the neural correlates underlying level-dependent changes in vowel identification, a computational auditory-nerve model was used to estimate formant and F0 difference cues under the same listening conditions. Template contrast and average localized synchronized rate predicted level-dependent changes in the strength of phase locking to F0s and formants of concurrent vowels, respectively. At lower levels, poorer F0 benefit may be attributed to poorer phase locking to both F0s, which resulted from lower firing rates of auditory-nerve fibers. At higher levels, poorer identification scores may relate to poorer phase locking to the second formant, due to synchrony capture by lower formants. These findings suggest that concurrent vowel identification may be partly influenced by level-dependent changes in phase locking of auditory-nerve fibers to F0s and formants of both vowels.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25002128      PMCID: PMC4164690          DOI: 10.1007/s10162-014-0475-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol        ISSN: 1438-7573


  39 in total

1.  The representation of the spectra and fundamental frequencies of steady-state single- and double-vowel sounds in the temporal discharge patterns of guinea pig cochlear-nerve fibers.

Authors:  A R Palmer
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Modeling the perception of concurrent vowels: vowels with different fundamental frequencies.

Authors:  P F Assmann; Q Summerfield
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Age-related loss of activity of auditory-nerve fibers.

Authors:  R A Schmiedt; J H Mills; F A Boettcher
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Neural correlates of the pitch of complex tones. I. Pitch and pitch salience.

Authors:  P A Cariani; B Delgutte
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Encoding of steady-state vowels in the auditory nerve: representation in terms of discharge rate.

Authors:  M B Sachs; E D Young
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1979-08       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  A model for the responses of low-frequency auditory-nerve fibers in cat.

Authors:  L H Carney
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  The contribution of waveform interactions to the perception of concurrent vowels.

Authors:  P F Assmann; Q Summerfield
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Antimasking effects of the olivocochlear reflex. II. Enhancement of auditory-nerve response to masked tones.

Authors:  T Kawase; B Delgutte; M C Liberman
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  The relationship between spike rate and synchrony in responses of auditory-nerve fibers to single tones.

Authors:  D H Johnson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1980-10       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Modeling the identification of concurrent vowels with different fundamental frequencies.

Authors:  R Meddis; M J Hewitt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  7 in total

1.  Effects of age and hearing loss on concurrent vowel identification.

Authors:  Ananthakrishna Chintanpalli; Jayne B Ahlstrom; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Modeling the level-dependent changes of concurrent vowel scores.

Authors:  Harshavardhan Settibhaktini; Ananthakrishna Chintanpalli
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Brainstem correlates of concurrent speech identification in adverse listening conditions.

Authors:  Anusha Yellamsetty; Gavin M Bidelman
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2019-02-20       Impact factor: 3.252

4.  Modeling the effects of age and hearing loss on concurrent vowel scores.

Authors:  Harshavardhan Settibhaktini; Michael G Heinz; Ananthakrishna Chintanpalli
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2021-11       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Effects of Physiological Internal Noise on Model Predictions of Concurrent Vowel Identification for Normal-Hearing Listeners.

Authors:  Mark S Hedrick; Il Joon Moon; Jihwan Woo; Jong Ho Won
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-02-11       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Comparison of temporal fine structure sensitivity and concurrent vowel perception between children with and without reading disability.

Authors:  Arivudainambi Pitchaimuthu; Eshwari Ananth; Jayashree S Bhat; Somashekara Haralakatta Shivananjappa
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2020-10-23

7.  Jagged-2 enhances immunomodulatory activity in adipose derived mesenchymal stem cells.

Authors:  Zhu Xishan; Zhang Bin; Zhao Haiyue; Dou Xiaowei; Bai Jingwen; Zhang Guojun
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-09-28       Impact factor: 4.379

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.