Literature DB >> 10420625

Vowel-specific effects in concurrent vowel identification.

A de Cheveigné1.   

Abstract

An experiment investigated the effects of amplitude ratio (-35 to 35 dB in 10-dB steps) and fundamental frequency difference (0%, 3%, 6%, and 12%) on the identification of pairs of concurrent synthetic vowels. Vowels as weak as -25 dB relative to their competitor were easier to identify in the presence of a fundamental frequency difference (delta F0). Vowels as weak as -35 dB were not. Identification was generally the same at delta F0 = 3%, 6%, and 12% for all amplitude ratios: unfavorable amplitude ratios could not be compensated by larger delta F0's. Data for each vowel pair and each amplitude ratio, at delta F0 = 0%, were compared to the spectral envelope of the stimulus at the same ratio, in order to determine which spectral cues determined identification. This information was then used to interpret the pattern of improvement with delta F0 for each vowel pair, to better understand mechanisms of F0-guided segregation. Identification of a vowel was possible in the presence of strong cues belonging to its competitor, as long as cues to its own formants F1 and F2 were prominent. delta F0 enhanced the prominence of a target vowel's cues, even when the spectrum of the target was up to 10 dB below that of its competitor at all frequencies. The results are incompatible with models of segregation based on harmonic enhancement, beats, or channel selection.

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10420625     DOI: 10.1121/1.427059

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  8 in total

1.  Temporal offset judgments for concurrent vowels by young, middle-aged, and older adults.

Authors:  Daniel Fogerty; Diane Kewley-Port; Larry E Humes
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Responses of inferior colliculus neurons to double harmonic tones.

Authors:  Donal G Sinex; Hongzhe Li
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-10-03       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 3.  Spectral processing and sound source determination.

Authors:  Donal G Sinex
Journal:  Int Rev Neurobiol       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 3.230

4.  Responses of cochlear nucleus neurons to harmonic and mistuned complex tones.

Authors:  Donal G Sinex
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2007-11-13       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Pitch representations in the auditory nerve: two concurrent complex tones.

Authors:  Erik Larsen; Leonardo Cedolin; Bertrand Delgutte
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-07-16       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Effects of Physiological Internal Noise on Model Predictions of Concurrent Vowel Identification for Normal-Hearing Listeners.

Authors:  Mark S Hedrick; Il Joon Moon; Jihwan Woo; Jong Ho Won
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-02-11       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Harmonic Cancellation-A Fundamental of Auditory Scene Analysis.

Authors:  Alain de Cheveigné
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2021 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

8.  Neural Representation of Concurrent Vowels in Macaque Primary Auditory Cortex.

Authors:  Yonatan I Fishman; Christophe Micheyl; Mitchell Steinschneider
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2016-06-10
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.