Literature DB >> 16838534

The case of the missing delay lines: synthetic delays obtained by cross-channel phase interaction.

Alain de Cheveigné1, Daniel Pressnitzer.   

Abstract

Temporal models of pitch and harmonic segregation call for delays of up to 30 ms to cover the full range of existence of musical pitch. To date there is little anatomical or physiological evidence for delays that long. We propose a mechanism by which delays may be synthesized from cross-channel phase interaction. Phases of adjacent cochlear filter channels are shifted by an amount proportional to frequency and then combined as a weighted sum to approximate a delay. Synthetic delays may be used by pitch perception models such as autocorrelation, segregation models such as harmonic cancellation, and binaural processing models to explain sensitivity to large interaural delays. The maximum duration of synthetic delays is limited by the duration of the impulse responses of cochlear filters, itself inversely proportional to cochlear filter bandwidth. Maximum delay is thus frequency dependent. This may explain the fact, puzzling for temporal pitch models such as autocorrelation, that pitch is more salient and easy to discriminate for complex tones that contain resolved partials.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16838534     DOI: 10.1121/1.2195291

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  13 in total

1.  An autocorrelation model with place dependence to account for the effect of harmonic number on fundamental frequency discrimination.

Authors:  Joshua G W Bernstein; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Harmonic segregation through mistuning can improve fundamental frequency discrimination.

Authors:  Joshua G W Bernstein; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Pitch discrimination with mixtures of three concurrent harmonic complexes.

Authors:  Jackson E Graves; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Effect of lowest harmonic rank on fundamental-frequency difference limens varies with fundamental frequency.

Authors:  Anahita H Mehta; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Deep neural network models reveal interplay of peripheral coding and stimulus statistics in pitch perception.

Authors:  Mark R Saddler; Ray Gonzalez; Josh H McDermott
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-12-14       Impact factor: 17.694

6.  Pitch representations in the auditory nerve: two concurrent complex tones.

Authors:  Erik Larsen; Leonardo Cedolin; Bertrand Delgutte
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-07-16       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 7.  Binaural hearing with electrical stimulation.

Authors:  Alan Kan; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2014-09-02       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 8.  Across-channel timing differences as a potential code for the frequency of pure tones.

Authors:  Robert P Carlyon; Christopher J Long; Christophe Micheyl
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2011-12-08

9.  Understanding pitch perception as a hierarchical process with top-down modulation.

Authors:  Emili Balaguer-Ballester; Nicholas R Clark; Martin Coath; Katrin Krumbholz; Susan L Denham
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2009-03-06       Impact factor: 4.475

10.  A Neuronal Network Model for Pitch Selectivity and Representation.

Authors:  Chengcheng Huang; John Rinzel
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2016-06-16       Impact factor: 2.380

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.