Literature DB >> 1774414

Temporal representation of rippled noise in the anteroventral cochlear nucleus of the chinchilla.

W P Shofner1.   

Abstract

This paper describes the temporal responses of anteroventral cochlear nucleus (AVCN) units in the chinchilla to rippled noises. Rippled noise is generated when a wideband noise is delayed and added (cos+ noise) or subtracted (cos- noise) to the undelayed noise. Renewal densities were constructed to evaluate synchronous discharges at the delay. In response to rippled noise, AVCN units which show phase locking to best frequency (BF) tones gave renewal densities having major peaks at the delay for cos+ noise, but nulls at the delay for cos- noise. Most AVCN units which did not show BF phase locking gave renewal densities that did not contain features related to the rippled noise delay; a few of these nonphase-locked units did show peaks in renewal densities for both cos+ and cos- noises. Synchrony at the rippled noise delay was also demonstrated with evoked potential recording. Autocorrelation functions of the neurophonic potential showed peaks at the rippled noise delay for both cos+ and cos- noises. In addition, peaks could be observed in the autocorrelation functions of neurophonic potentials for rippled noises with delays as short as 1 ms; peaks were never observed in renewal densities of single units for ripple delays as short as 1 ms. The results show that a temporal representation of rippled noise delay does exist in the AVCN and are consistent with current hypotheses regarding functions of AVCN subsystems. The temporal representation of the delay is a presumptive neural code for the pitches of rippled noises.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1774414     DOI: 10.1121/1.402049

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  9 in total

1.  Neural representation of pitch salience in the human brainstem revealed by psychophysical and electrophysiological indices.

Authors:  Ananthanarayan Krishnan; Gavin M Bidelman; Jackson T Gandour
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2010-05-10       Impact factor: 3.208

2.  Human frequency following responses to iterated rippled noise with positive and negative gain: Differential sensitivity to waveform envelope and temporal fine-structure.

Authors:  Saradha Ananthakrishnan; Ananthanarayan Krishnan
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2018-07-29       Impact factor: 3.208

3.  The temporal representation of the delay of iterated rippled noise in the ventral cochlear nucleus of the guinea-pig.

Authors:  I M Winter; L Wiegrebe; R D Patterson
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2001-12-01       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Spatiotemporal representation of the pitch of harmonic complex tones in the auditory nerve.

Authors:  Leonardo Cedolin; Bertrand Delgutte
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-09-22       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Pitch of complex tones: rate-place and interspike interval representations in the auditory nerve.

Authors:  Leonardo Cedolin; Bertrand Delgutte
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2005-03-23       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Brainstem pitch representation in native speakers of Mandarin is less susceptible to degradation of stimulus temporal regularity.

Authors:  Ananthanarayan Krishnan; Jackson T Gandour; Gavin M Bidelman
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2009-12-02       Impact factor: 3.252

7.  Representation of the spectral dominance region of pitch in the steady-state temporal discharge patterns of cochlear nucleus units.

Authors:  William P Shofner
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Pitch representations in the auditory nerve: two concurrent complex tones.

Authors:  Erik Larsen; Leonardo Cedolin; Bertrand Delgutte
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-07-16       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Neuronal population model of globular bushy cells covering unit-to-unit variability.

Authors:  Go Ashida; Helen T Heinermann; Jutta Kretzberg
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2019-12-27       Impact factor: 4.475

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.