Literature DB >> 15734356

Accounting for nonlinear BOLD effects in fMRI: parameter estimates and a model for prediction in rapid event-related studies.

Tor D Wager1, Alberto Vazquez, Luis Hernandez, Douglas C Noll.   

Abstract

Nonlinear effects in fMRI BOLD data may substantially influence estimates of task-related activations, particularly in rapid event-related designs. If the BOLD response to each stimulus is assumed to be independent of the stimulation history, nonlinear interactions create a prediction error that may reduce sensitivity. When stimulus density differs among conditions, nonlinear effects can cause artifactual differences in activation. This situation can occur in rapid event-related designs or when comparing blocks of unequal lengths. We present data showing substantial nonlinear history effects for stimuli 1 s apart and use estimates of nonlinearities in response magnitude, onset time, and time to peak to form a low-dimensional parameterization of these nonlinear effects. Our estimates of nonlinearity appear relatively consistent throughout the brain, and these estimates can be used to form adjusted linear predictors for future rapid event-related fMRI studies. Adjusting the linear model for these known nonlinear effects results in a substantially better model fit. The biggest advantages to using predictors adjusted for known nonlinear effects are (1) higher sensitivity at the individual subject level of analysis, (2) better control of confounds related to nonlinear effects, and (3) more accurate estimates of design efficiency in experimental fMRI design.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15734356     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.11.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  38 in total

1.  Nonlinearities in rapid event-related fMRI explained by stimulus scaling.

Authors:  Genevieve M Heckman; Seth E Bouvier; Valerie A Carr; Erin M Harley; Kristen S Cardinal; Stephen A Engel
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2006-11-17       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  Remapping in human visual cortex.

Authors:  Elisha P Merriam; Christopher R Genovese; Carol L Colby
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2006-11-08       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Validity and power in hemodynamic response modeling: a comparison study and a new approach.

Authors:  Martin A Lindquist; Tor D Wager
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Biphasic hemodynamic responses influence deactivation and may mask activation in block-design fMRI paradigms.

Authors:  Jed A Meltzer; Michiro Negishi; R Todd Constable
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  Power calculation for group fMRI studies accounting for arbitrary design and temporal autocorrelation.

Authors:  Jeanette A Mumford; Thomas E Nichols
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-08-19       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Modeling low-frequency fluctuation and hemodynamic response timecourse in event-related fMRI.

Authors:  Kendrick N Kay; Stephen V David; Ryan J Prenger; Kathleen A Hansen; Jack L Gallant
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 5.038

7.  Meditation leads to reduced default mode network activity beyond an active task.

Authors:  Kathleen A Garrison; Thomas A Zeffiro; Dustin Scheinost; R Todd Constable; Judson A Brewer
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 3.282

8.  Source estimates for MEG/EEG visual evoked responses constrained by multiple, retinotopically-mapped stimulus locations.

Authors:  Donald J Hagler; Eric Halgren; Antigona Martinez; Mingxiong Huang; Steven A Hillyard; Anders M Dale
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 5.038

9.  Cortical depth-dependent temporal dynamics of the BOLD response in the human brain.

Authors:  Jeroen C W Siero; Natalia Petridou; Hans Hoogduin; Peter R Luijten; Nick F Ramsey
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2011-04-20       Impact factor: 6.200

10.  Nonlinear estimation of neural processing time from BOLD signal with application to decision-making.

Authors:  Claudinei Eduardo Biazoli; João Ricardo Sato; Ellison Fernando Cardoso; Michael John Brammer; Edson Amaro
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-03-09       Impact factor: 5.038

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.