Literature DB >> 22421459

Mixed-norm estimates for the M/EEG inverse problem using accelerated gradient methods.

Alexandre Gramfort1, Matthieu Kowalski, Matti Hämäläinen.   

Abstract

Magneto- and electroencephalography (M/EEG) measure the electromagnetic fields produced by the neural electrical currents. Given a conductor model for the head, and the distribution of source currents in the brain, Maxwell's equations allow one to compute the ensuing M/EEG signals. Given the actual M/EEG measurements and the solution of this forward problem, one can localize, in space and in time, the brain regions that have produced the recorded data. However, due to the physics of the problem, the limited number of sensors compared to the number of possible source locations, and measurement noise, this inverse problem is ill-posed. Consequently, additional constraints are needed. Classical inverse solvers, often called minimum norm estimates (MNE), promote source estimates with a small ℓ₂ norm. Here, we consider a more general class of priors based on mixed norms. Such norms have the ability to structure the prior in order to incorporate some additional assumptions about the sources. We refer to such solvers as mixed-norm estimates (MxNE). In the context of M/EEG, MxNE can promote spatially focal sources with smooth temporal estimates with a two-level ℓ₁/ℓ₂ mixed-norm, while a three-level mixed-norm can be used to promote spatially non-overlapping sources between different experimental conditions. In order to efficiently solve the optimization problems of MxNE, we introduce fast first-order iterative schemes that for the ℓ₁/ℓ₂ norm give solutions in a few seconds making such a prior as convenient as the simple MNE. Furthermore, thanks to the convexity of the optimization problem, we can provide optimality conditions that guarantee global convergence. The utility of the methods is demonstrated both with simulations and experimental MEG data.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22421459      PMCID: PMC3566429          DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/57/7/1937

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  28 in total

1.  EEG and MEG: forward solutions for inverse methods.

Authors:  J C Mosher; R M Leahy; P S Lewis
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 4.538

2.  Spatiotemporal localization of significant activation in MEG using permutation tests.

Authors:  Dimitrios Pantazis; Thomas E Nichols; Sylvain Baillet; Richard M Leahy
Journal:  Inf Process Med Imaging       Date:  2003-07

3.  Magnetic source images determined by a lead-field analysis: the unique minimum-norm least-squares estimation.

Authors:  J Z Wang; S J Williamson; L Kaufman
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 4.538

4.  The advantage of combining MEG and EEG: comparison to fMRI in focally stimulated visual cortex.

Authors:  Dahlia Sharon; Matti S Hämäläinen; Roger B H Tootell; Eric Halgren; John W Belliveau
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-04-19       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Automatic relevance determination based hierarchical Bayesian MEG inversion in practice.

Authors:  Aapo Nummenmaa; Toni Auranen; Matti S Hämäläinen; Iiro P Jääskeläinen; Mikko Sams; Aki Vehtari; Jouko Lampinen
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-04-19       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Combining sparsity and rotational invariance in EEG/MEG source reconstruction.

Authors:  Stefan Haufe; Vadim V Nikulin; Andreas Ziehe; Klaus-Robert Müller; Guido Nolte
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2008-05-03       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  Neuromagnetic source imaging with FOCUSS: a recursive weighted minimum norm algorithm.

Authors:  I F Gorodnitsky; J S George; B D Rao
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1995-10

8.  Low resolution electromagnetic tomography: a new method for localizing electrical activity in the brain.

Authors:  R D Pascual-Marqui; C M Michel; D Lehmann
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 2.997

9.  Cortical current density reconstruction of interictal epileptiform activity in temporal lobe epilepsy.

Authors:  H J Huppertz; S Hoegg; C Sick; C H Lücking; J Zentner; A Schulze-Bonhage; R Kristeva-Feige
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 3.708

10.  OpenMEEG: opensource software for quasistatic bioelectromagnetics.

Authors:  Alexandre Gramfort; Théodore Papadopoulo; Emmanuel Olivi; Maureen Clerc
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2010-09-06       Impact factor: 2.819

View more
  27 in total

1.  EEG/MEG source reconstruction with spatial-temporal two-way regularized regression.

Authors:  Tian Siva Tian; Jianhua Z Huang; Haipeng Shen; Zhimin Li
Journal:  Neuroinformatics       Date:  2013-10

2.  Imaging brain source extent from EEG/MEG by means of an iteratively reweighted edge sparsity minimization (IRES) strategy.

Authors:  Abbas Sohrabpour; Yunfeng Lu; Gregory Worrell; Bin He
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2016-05-27       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  A Subspace Pursuit-based Iterative Greedy Hierarchical solution to the neuromagnetic inverse problem.

Authors:  Behtash Babadi; Gabriel Obregon-Henao; Camilo Lamus; Matti S Hämäläinen; Emery N Brown; Patrick L Purdon
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Time-frequency mixed-norm estimates: sparse M/EEG imaging with non-stationary source activations.

Authors:  A Gramfort; D Strohmeier; J Haueisen; M S Hämäläinen; M Kowalski
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-01-04       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 5.  Using neuroimaging to understand the cortical mechanisms of auditory selective attention.

Authors:  Adrian K C Lee; Eric Larson; Ross K Maddox; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2013-07-09       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Multi-Resolution Graph Based Volumetric Cortical Basis Functions From Local Anatomic Features.

Authors:  Damon E Hyde; Jurriaan Peters; Simon K Warfield
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2019-03-13       Impact factor: 4.538

Review 7.  IFCN-endorsed practical guidelines for clinical magnetoencephalography (MEG).

Authors:  Riitta Hari; Sylvain Baillet; Gareth Barnes; Richard Burgess; Nina Forss; Joachim Gross; Matti Hämäläinen; Ole Jensen; Ryusuke Kakigi; François Mauguière; Nobukatzu Nakasato; Aina Puce; Gian-Luca Romani; Alfons Schnitzler; Samu Taulu
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-04-17       Impact factor: 3.708

8.  Adding dynamics to the Human Connectome Project with MEG.

Authors:  L J Larson-Prior; R Oostenveld; S Della Penna; G Michalareas; F Prior; A Babajani-Feremi; J-M Schoffelen; L Marzetti; F de Pasquale; F Di Pompeo; J Stout; M Woolrich; Q Luo; R Bucholz; P Fries; V Pizzella; G L Romani; M Corbetta; A Z Snyder
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-05-20       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  The Iterative Reweighted Mixed-Norm Estimate for Spatio-Temporal MEG/EEG Source Reconstruction.

Authors:  Daniel Strohmeier; Yousra Bekhti; Jens Haueisen; Alexandre Gramfort
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2016-04-13       Impact factor: 10.048

10.  MNE software for processing MEG and EEG data.

Authors:  Alexandre Gramfort; Martin Luessi; Eric Larson; Denis A Engemann; Daniel Strohmeier; Christian Brodbeck; Lauri Parkkonen; Matti S Hämäläinen
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-10-24       Impact factor: 6.556

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.