Literature DB >> 10194619

Bayesian inference applied to the electromagnetic inverse problem.

D M Schmidt1, J S George, C C Wood.   

Abstract

We present a new approach to the electromagnetic inverse problem that explicitly addresses the ambiguity associated with its ill-posed character. Rather than calculating a single "best" solution according to some criterion, our approach produces a large number of likely solutions that both fit the data and any prior information that is used. Whereas the range of the different likely results is representative of the ambiguity in the inverse problem even with prior information present, features that are common across a large number of the different solutions can be identified and are associated with a high degree of probability. This approach is implemented and quantified within the formalism of Bayesian inference, which combines prior information with that of measurement in a common framework using a single measure. To demonstrate this approach, a general neural activation model is constructed that includes a variable number of extended regions of activation and can incorporate a great deal of prior information on neural current such as information on location, orientation, strength, and spatial smoothness. Taken together, this activation model and the Bayesian inferential approach yield estimates of the probability distributions for the number, location, and extent of active regions. Both simulated MEG data and data from a visual evoked response experiment are used to demonstrate the capabilities of this approach.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10194619      PMCID: PMC6873293          DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0193(1999)7:3<195::aid-hbm4>3.0.co;2-f

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp        ISSN: 1065-9471            Impact factor:   5.038


  15 in total

1.  Magnetic source images determined by a lead-field analysis: the unique minimum-norm least-squares estimation.

Authors:  J Z Wang; S J Williamson; L Kaufman
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 4.538

2.  Multiple dipole modeling and localization from spatio-temporal MEG data.

Authors:  J C Mosher; P S Lewis; R M Leahy
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 4.538

3.  Improved Localizadon of Cortical Activity by Combining EEG and MEG with MRI Cortical Surface Reconstruction: A Linear Approach.

Authors:  A M Dale; M I Sereno
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  A Bayesian approach to introducing anatomo-functional priors in the EEG/MEG inverse problem.

Authors:  S Baillet; L Garnero
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 4.538

Review 5.  Mapping function in the human brain with magnetoencephalography, anatomical magnetic resonance imaging, and functional magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  J S George; C J Aine; J C Mosher; D M Schmidt; D M Ranken; H A Schlitt; C C Wood; J D Lewine; J A Sanders; J W Belliveau
Journal:  J Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 2.177

Review 6.  A conceptual overview and critique of functional neuroimaging techniques in humans: I. MRI/FMRI and PET.

Authors:  C J Aine
Journal:  Crit Rev Neurobiol       Date:  1995

7.  Neuromagnetic source imaging with FOCUSS: a recursive weighted minimum norm algorithm.

Authors:  I F Gorodnitsky; J S George; B D Rao
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1995-10

8.  Low resolution electromagnetic tomography: a new method for localizing electrical activity in the brain.

Authors:  R D Pascual-Marqui; C M Michel; D Lehmann
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 2.997

9.  Retinotopic organization of human visual cortex: departures from the classical model.

Authors:  C J Aine; S Supek; J S George; D Ranken; J Lewine; J Sanders; E Best; W Tiee; E R Flynn; C C Wood
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  1996 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.357

10.  Borders of multiple visual areas in humans revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  M I Sereno; A M Dale; J B Reppas; K K Kwong; J W Belliveau; T J Brady; B R Rosen; R B Tootell
Journal:  Science       Date:  1995-05-12       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  18 in total

1.  Increasing the accuracy of electromagnetic inverses using functional area source correlation constraints.

Authors:  Benoit R Cottereau; Justin M Ales; Anthony M Norcia
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-09-21       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Reconstruction of extended cortical sources for EEG and MEG based on a Monte-Carlo-Markov-chain estimator.

Authors:  Wilhelm Emil Kincses; Christoph Braun; Stefan Kaiser; Wolfgang Grodd; Hermann Ackermann; Klaus Mathiak
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Controlled Support MEG imaging.

Authors:  Srikantan S Nagarajan; Oleg Portniaguine; Dosik Hwang; Chris Johnson; Kensuke Sekihara
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2006-09-15       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Bayesian inverse analysis of neuromagnetic data using cortically constrained multiple dipoles.

Authors:  Toni Auranen; Aapo Nummenmaa; Matti S Hämäläinen; Iiro P Jääskeläinen; Jouko Lampinen; Aki Vehtari; Mikko Sams
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  Bayesian brain source imaging based on combined MEG/EEG and fMRI using MCMC.

Authors:  Sung C Jun; John S George; Woohan Kim; Juliana Paré-Blagoev; Sergey Plis; Doug M Ranken; David M Schmidt
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-12-28       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Automatic fMRI-guided MEG multidipole localization for visual responses.

Authors:  Toni Auranen; Aapo Nummenmaa; Simo Vanni; Aki Vehtari; Matti S Hämäläinen; Jouko Lampinen; Iiro P Jääskeläinen
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 5.038

7.  Source estimates for MEG/EEG visual evoked responses constrained by multiple, retinotopically-mapped stimulus locations.

Authors:  Donald J Hagler; Eric Halgren; Antigona Martinez; Mingxiong Huang; Steven A Hillyard; Anders M Dale
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 5.038

8.  MEG and fMRI Fusion for Non-Linear Estimation of Neural and BOLD Signal Changes.

Authors:  Sergey M Plis; Vince D Calhoun; Michael P Weisend; Tom Eichele; Terran Lane
Journal:  Front Neuroinform       Date:  2010-11-11       Impact factor: 4.081

Review 9.  How to use fMRI functional localizers to improve EEG/MEG source estimation.

Authors:  Benoit R Cottereau; Justin M Ales; Anthony M Norcia
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2014-08-01       Impact factor: 2.390

10.  MEG-SIM: a web portal for testing MEG analysis methods using realistic simulated and empirical data.

Authors:  C J Aine; L Sanfratello; D Ranken; E Best; J A MacArthur; T Wallace; K Gilliam; C H Donahue; R Montaño; J E Bryant; A Scott; J M Stephen
Journal:  Neuroinformatics       Date:  2012-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.